Breaking News
Tamil Nadu Assembly Elections: AIADMK released manifesto, Palaniswami made 297 promises. india news

Tamil Nadu Assembly Elections: AIADMK released manifesto, Palaniswami made 297 promises
AIADMK General Secretary and Leader of Opposition in Tamil Nadu Assembly

New Delhi: AIADMK general secretary Edappadi K Palaniswami on Tuesday released the party’s Tamil Nadu Assembly election manifesto, revealing 297 promises ahead of the April 23 polls.The manifesto puts welfare measures at the center of the party’s campaign, including a monthly assistance of Rs 2,000 for female heads of households and a special assistance of Rs 10,000 for each family.EPS also promised ‘Kul Vilakku Scheme’ for women. Under the scheme, monthly assistance will be given to all ration card holders and will be deposited directly into the bank account of the female head of the family.“To promote economic balance within the society, a monthly support allowance of Rs 2,000 will be provided to all ration cardholders through the ‘Kul Vilakku Scheme’. This amount will be deposited directly into the bank account of the female head of the family.”The manifesto said the special assistance of Rs 10,000 is to help households cope with rising prices and higher taxes.“Under the administratively incompetent Stalin-led DMK regime – due to its lack of foresight – prices of essential commodities have skyrocketed in the last five years. As a result, the public has been seriously affected. Besides, various taxes including property tax, house tax, electricity charges and water charges have been increased. As a result, the daily financial burden on families has increased manifold. Therefore, with the aim of reducing this burden on the people, a special assistance amount of Rs. Rs 10,000 will be provided to each family,” the manifesto read.Among other promises, the party said ration card holders will also get rice and pulses along with refrigerators. It also promised to extend the free bus travel scheme to men besides women and provide three free cooking gas cylinders a year to every ration cardholder.Tamil Nadu will go to polls in a single phase on April 23 and counting of votes will take place on May 4.Under the NDA seat-sharing agreement, the AIADMK-led alliance will contest on more than 170 seats. BJP has been allotted 27 seats, followed by PMK with 18 seats and AMMK with 11 seats.Meanwhile, the AIADMK is intensifying talks to finalize the alliance with GK Vasan’s TMC(M) and other smaller parties before the end of Tuesday.The main contest is expected to be between the DMK-led secular progressive alliance, comprising Congress, DMDK and VCK, and the AIADMK-led NDA with allies BJP and PMK. Actor-turned-politician Vijay is also set to make his electoral debut with TVK, which is likely to lead to a triangular contest in the elections.

Source link

IPL: When will Kal Somani-led consortium’s purchase of Rajasthan Royals be implemented? | cricket news

IPL: When will Kal Somani-led consortium's purchase of Rajasthan Royals be implemented?

New Delhi: As IPL 2026 approaches, a major off-field development has come into focus Rajasthan RoyalsChampion of the inaugural edition of the Indian Premier League (IPL), US-based entrepreneur Kal is being acquired by a consortium led by Somani for a whopping $1.63 billion. Despite the scale of the deal, the ownership change will only take effect after the conclusion of the 2026 season, meaning the current structure will remain in place for now.Somani is not new to the franchise, having been a minority investor since 2021.

Watch

Is this India’s best white-ball team? Nikhil Chopra on 2027 ODI World Cup

With this latest move, he is set to take full control, which will significantly increase the global valuation of the franchise. Known for his strong presence in the US tech industry, Somani heads companies such as IntraEdge, Truyo and Truyo.AI and Academia, and has gradually expanded his interest in the sports world through investment and ownership roles.What makes this acquisition particularly noteworthy is the high-profile backing behind Somani’s consortium. Among the prominent names is Walmart heir and owner of the NFL’s Denver Broncos Rob Walton, widely considered one of the wealthiest sports owners in the United States. The group also includes the Hamp family, led by Sheila Ford Hamp, owner of the Detroit Lions and part of the Ford Motor Company legacy. Somani has expressed confidence in the future of IPL for a long time. Speaking about his first investment in 2021, he had said, “We see great potential in this investment and we are excited about the future of the IPL.” His continued commitment underlines the widespread confidence in the league’s rapid growth.

Source link

देहरादून: राज्य पैरालंपिक खेल 27 मार्च से महाराणा प्रताप स्पोर्ट्स स्टेडियम में शुरू होंगे

माई सिटी रिपोर्टर, देहरादून

द्वारा प्रकाशित: अलका त्यागी

अद्यतन मंगलवार, 24 मार्च 2026 05:39 अपराह्न IST

पैरा गेम्स के अंतर्गत पैरा एथलेटिक्स, पावरलिफ्टिंग, बैडमिंटन, वॉलीबॉल और टेबल टेनिस की प्रतियोगिताएं आयोजित की जाएंगी।


देहरादून: राज्य पैरा गेम्स 27 मार्च से महाराणा प्रताप स्पोर्ट्स स्टेडियम में शुरू होंगे

– फोटोः अमर उजाला फाइल फोटो



विस्तार

पैरालंपिक एसोसिएशन ऑफ उत्तराखंड की ओर से राजधानी दून में तीन दिनों तक स्टेट पैरा गेम्स का आयोजन किया जाएगा। पैरा खिलाड़ियों को बढ़ावा देने के उद्देश्य से 27 से 29 मार्च तक महाराणा प्रताप स्पोर्ट्स स्टेडियम में आयोजित होने वाले पैरा गेम्स में प्रदेश के 13 जिलों की टीमें भाग लेंगी।

ट्रेंडिंग वीडियो

देहरादून समाचार: अर्थव्यवस्था और सामाजिक सूचकांक में सुधार, विकसित उत्तराखंड के लिए अभी भी बहुत कुछ किया जाना बाकी है।

प्रेस क्लब में पत्रकारों को जानकारी देते हुए आयोजन सचिव प्रेम कुमार ने बताया कि पैरा गेम्स के तहत पैरा एथलेटिक्स, पावरलिफ्टिंग, बैडमिंटन, वॉलीबॉल और टेबल टेनिस की प्रतियोगिताएं आयोजित की जाएंगी. प्रतियोगिता में करीब 150 पैरा खिलाड़ी अपना दमखम दिखाएंगे. खिलाड़ियों के रजिस्ट्रेशन की आखिरी तारीख 25 मार्च तय की गई है.

Source link

When will Iran’s regime fall? What did the Mossad chief say?

ईरान का शासन कब गिरेगा? मोसाद प्रमुख ने क्या कहा?

File photo: Mossad chief David Barnia

A recent report claims that Mossad chief David Barnia reportedly told Israel’s cabinet before war with Iran that regime change in Tehran is possible, but it is likely to take about a year, not just days or weeks.According to The Jerusalem Post, Barnia presented several scenarios to Israeli leaders on the eve of war, some of which suggested a few months, but a one-year time frame was considered the most likely estimate.This more cautious assessment has been obscured by recent anonymous attacks, the report said, accusing them of exaggerating the prospects for a rapid collapse of the Iranian regime.

Qualified Assessment, No Guaranteed Prediction

The main point emerging from the report is that Barnea’s position was more meritorious than some later portrayals. According to The Jerusalem Post, he did not present regime change as inevitable, but rather as a possibility dependent on a number of conditions and likely to take a significant amount of time. The report said Barnia was known to attach caveats to major intelligence assessments and that any pitches he made to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu or US officials would have been strictly controlled and framed as part of a broader government strategy.However, this contradicts earlier reports which claimed that the Mossad expected a rapid coup.According to the New York Times report, Barnia told Netanyahu and senior Trump administration officials in mid-January that within days of the war starting, the Mossad could potentially help unify the Iranian opposition, leading to riots and acts of insurrection that could even lead to the fall of the government. However, the report also noted that no such rebellion had occurred three weeks into the war, and American-Israeli intelligence assessments concluded that the Iranian regime had been weakened but still intact.The Times of Israel, citing Channel 12, similarly reported that Barnia had assessed that overthrowing the Iranian regime would be possible if key military objectives were achieved first, including beheading the leadership, damaging regime institutions and weakening its ability to suppress civilians. But stressed that he also offered “disclaimers and qualifications”, noting that the situation was unstable and it could take a long time to achieve such results.Publicly, both Netanyahu and US President Donald Trump initially indicated that military action could create the conditions for regime change, but both also said that the Iranian people themselves would have to take action. Since then, the message has become more restrained. US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said on Thursday that the US intelligence community assesses that the Iranian regime remains intact but largely degraded.Netanyahu has also stopped short of predicting imminent collapse. He said Israel was working to “create the conditions” for the regime’s collapse, but added, “It may survive, maybe not. If it survives, it will be very weak.”

Source link

On this day in 1977: How Morarji Desai became India’s first non-Congress PM. india news

On this day in 1977: How Morarji Desai became India's first non-Congress PM
This image is used for representation purpose only (AI-generated)

On a cool March morning in 1977, inside the stately halls of Rashtrapati Bhavan, a brief swearing-in ceremony lasting barely three minutes changed the course of Indian politics.When 81-year-old Morarji Desai was sworn in as the country’s first non-Congress Prime Minister on March 24, 1977, it was not just a change of power, it was the first real disruption of a system that had remained largely unchanged since independence.The oath was administered by the then acting President BD Jatti.

Moraji Desai taking oath (Image/X)

At first glance, the ritual seemed routine, a formal transfer of power to the presidential residence. But behind its brevity lies a historic change, the end of almost decades of Congress dominance, the post-Emergency political reckoning and the beginning of coalition politics at the Centre.

1977 elections: the vote that changed everything

The general elections of 1977 were unlike any election held in India since independence.In the months before the vote, four major opposition factions – Samajwadi, Jan Sangh, Bharatiya Lok Dal (BLD), and Congress (O) came together. Janata Party.This unprecedented unity was driven by a common goal: to challenge the Congress rule under then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi and end the Emergency.The campaign gained momentum from widespread anger over the Emergency – which included forced sterilization campaigns, slum demolitions, arrests of political opponents, and press censorship.Perhaps for the first time, voters in rural and urban India were not just participating – they were abstaining.The result was decisive. Of the 542 seats, the Janata Party won 295 seats, while the Congress was reduced to 154, losing more than 200 seats compared to the last election.

.

.

Morarji Desai emerged as the unanimous choice to lead the new government.A veteran of the independence movement, Desai served as Chief Minister of Bombay (1952–1957) and Deputy Prime Minister (1967–1969).At 81, he became the oldest person to hold office as Prime Minister, a symbol of continuity at a moment of disruption.

Morarji Desai: Experienced politician sitting at the top

Morarji Desai’s rise was shaped by political currents as well as personal convictions.Born in 1896, he resigned from government service in 1930 to join the independence movement led by Mahatma Gandhi.

Morarji Desai's timeline

He was sent to jail several times and later played important roles in the Congress.During the Emergency, Desai was arrested on June 26, 1975 and spent several months in solitary confinement.His return from political prisoner to prime minister in 1977 reflects the larger story of the reset.He consistently argued that no one should be above the law, including the Prime Minister.“One must act in life according to the truth and one’s faith,” he had said – a line that defined both his politics and his moment.

.

.

Desai was later awarded the Bharat Ratna in 1991 and Pakistan’s Nishan-e-Pakistan in 1990.

Understanding the 1977 transition: What scholars say

The extraordinary change in Indian politics in 1977 did not happen suddenly. Political scientists and historians have long studied how and why India’s democracy, which appeared intact for decades, suddenly changed.Rajni Kothari: Congress SystemRajni Kothari was among the first scholars to describe the post-independence political system in India as the “Congress system”. in its original work congress system in indiaKothari points out that Indian politics in the 1950s and early 1960s was not dominated by any one party in a simple sense, but by a system in which the Congress functioned as the center of political life.Kothari argued that the Congress system contained a unique internal mechanism of political competition. Opposition parties existed, but played roles similar to pressure groups; There was very little chance of him coming to power directly. Myron Weiner: elections, emergency and democratic reformsIn his influential 1977 analysis, political scientist Myron Weiner examined the parliamentary elections that abruptly ended Congress. Weiner portrayed the 1977 election as a moment when Indian democracy corrected itself following the authoritarian precedent set during the Emergency.Weiner highlights that the Emergency was expected to strengthen Indira Gandhi’s authority. Between 1975 and 1977, the central government under Gandhiji suspended fundamental rights, imposed press censorship and used the state machinery to suppress dissent. Instead, the polls produced resounding congressional disapproval:

  • Many opposition parties united in Janata Party
  • Opposition leaders, many of whom have recently been released from jail, launched a nationwide campaign
  • Voters gave clear majority to Janta alliance

Yogendra Yadav: The era of four party systemBuilding on the work of scholars such as Kothari and others who have tracked Indian politics over decades, Yogendra Yadav has contributed to the understanding of how Indian party systems evolved through distinct stages. Yadav’s framework identifies four broad party-system eras in post-independence India:

  1. First-party system (1952–1967): dominance of congress system
  2. Second-party system (1967–1989): Congress maintains central position amid growing challenges, resulting in brief public intervention
  3. Third-party systems (1989–2014): Marked by coalition politics and fragmented national competition
  4. Fourth-party systems (since 2014): Characteristics of BJP’s dominance

Rift, Emergency and restoration of Congress

Rift between Morarji Desai and Indira GandhiThe conflict between Morarji Desai and Indira Gandhi was one of the defining power struggles in post-independence India.It began after the succession battle following the death of Lal Bahadur Shastri in 1966, when the party’s traditionalist leadership, the Congress syndicate, supported Gandhi over Desai.Desai, a senior leader and believer in conservative economic and administrative principles, represented the old faction, while Gandhi adopted a new, populist approach that consistently challenged the status quo.Tensions increased further in 1969 when Gandhiji removed Desai from the Finance Ministry. At this moment the Congress split into Congress (R), led by Gandhiji, and Congress (O), an organizational faction led by Desai and other senior leaders. Ideologically, the two leaders diverged sharply: Gandhi embraced socialist measures, including the nationalization of fourteen major banks, while Desai favored limited government intervention. Emergency: The dark chapter of democracyThe Emergency (1975–1977) was the climax of the political conflict between Gandhi and Desai. Following the Allahabad High Court’s decision to invalidate his election to the Lok Sabha, Gandhi imposed a nationwide emergency for 21 months, citing threats to national stability. Opposition leaders, including Desai, were arrested and kept in solitary confinement. During this period, the government took sweeping measures that increased its control over political and social life. Yet, the Emergency also created an unprecedented anti-Congress wave, prompting opposition parties to unite under the Janata Party banner.

.

.

Upon his release in early 1977, Morarji Desai became the face of this coalition, campaigning across the country and taking advantage of public dissatisfaction with authoritarian rule. The general elections of 1977 ultimately gave a decisive verdict in favor of Desai. Restoration of Congress: Return of Indira GandhiHowever, the Janata Party’s tenure proved unstable. Internal divisions, factionalism, and lack of united rule weakened its ability to govern effectively. Meanwhile, Indira Gandhi, although out of power, gradually regained her political base. His resurgence was marked by significant victories in the state assembly elections of Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh.Gandhi’s victory demonstrated his enduring appeal among the rural poor, minorities and women. The general elections of 1980 cemented his comeback. Gandhi’s party won a landslide majority by securing 353 seats out of 529, while the Janata Party’s seat share dropped to 41.

Could 1977 happen again?

The 1977 election remains the most striking example of a united opposition defeating a major ruling party at the national level.Ahead of the 2024 Lok Sabha elections, opposition parties attempted a similar consolidation under the Bharat Alliance.Despite coordination between more than two dozen parties, the BJP returned to power.Nearly five decades after Desai was sworn in, the country has again entered a phase of dominance, this time with the BJP raising a familiar question: Can a fragmented opposition repeat the unity of 1977?History offers both hope and caution. While 1977 proved that electoral waves can topple a strong regime, it also showed that it is not just victory but cohesion that determines longevity.1977 was a reminder that democratic systems can be reset, but only if voters, opposition forces, and institutions unite in a single moment.

Source link

13 साल तक कोमा में रहे हरीश राणा की मौत, सुप्रीम कोर्ट की इजाजत के बाद दी गई इच्छामृत्यु.

गाजियाबाद के रहने वाले हरीश राणा का दिल्ली के अखिल भारतीय आयुर्वेदिक विज्ञान संस्थान में निधन हो गया। वह पिछले 13 वर्षों से कोमा में थे और हाल ही में भारत के सर्वोच्च न्यायालय ने उन्हें इच्छामृत्यु की अनुमति दी थी। हरीश का इलाज एम्स के इंस्टीट्यूट रोटरी कैंसर हॉस्पिटल (आईआरसीएच) में चल रहा था। पिछले एक सप्ताह से उन्हें बिना भोजन और पानी के चिकित्सकीय निगरानी में रखा गया था। इस दौरान उनके माता-पिता लगातार किसी चमत्कार की उम्मीद कर रहे थे। इच्छामृत्यु और मानवीय संवेदनाओं से जुड़ा ये मामला देश में चर्चा का बड़ा विषय बन गया है.

माँ की प्रार्थना और भावुक पल
हरीश के आखिरी दिनों में उनकी मां अस्पताल के गलियारे में बैठकर हनुमान चालीसा का पाठ कर रही थीं। अपने बेटे की हालत देखकर उन्होंने भावुक होकर कहा कि उनका बेटा अभी सांस ले रहा है और उसकी दिल की धड़कन चल रही है. उन्होंने यह भी कहा कि उनका बेटा उन्हें छोड़ रहा है. इस दृश्य ने वहां मौजूद लोगों को भी भावुक कर दिया.

कैसे हुई इच्छामृत्यु की प्रक्रिया?
सुप्रीम कोर्ट से इजाजत मिलने के बाद हरीश राणा को प्रशामक देखभाल वार्ड में रखा गया था. डॉक्टरों की एक विशेष टीम लगातार उनकी निगरानी कर रही थी. करीब एक हफ्ते तक उसे खाना और पानी नहीं दिया गया. इस प्रक्रिया को मेडिकल भाषा में पैसिव यूथेनेसिया कहा जाता है। छह दिन तक चली इस प्रक्रिया के बाद उनकी मौत हो गई.

2013 में हादसे के बाद जिंदगी बदल गई
हरीश राणा ने जुलाई 2010 में चंडीगढ़ विश्वविद्यालय में सिविल इंजीनियरिंग में प्रवेश लिया। वर्ष 2013 में, वह अंतिम वर्ष के छात्र थे। उसी साल रक्षाबंधन के दिन वह अपनी बहन से फोन पर बात करते वक्त पीजी की चौथी मंजिल से गिर गए. गंभीर हालत में उन्हें पहले पीजीआई चंडीगढ़ और बाद में दिल्ली के एलएनजेपी अस्पताल में भर्ती कराया गया। डॉक्टरों ने बताया कि वह क्वाड्रिप्लेजिया से पीड़ित थे, जिसके कारण उनके हाथ-पैर पूरी तरह से निष्क्रिय हो गए थे।

कानूनी लड़ाई और सुप्रीम कोर्ट का फैसला
उसकी पीड़ा को देखते हुए हरीश के माता-पिता ने इच्छामृत्यु की इजाजत के लिए अदालत का दरवाजा खटखटाया। 8 जुलाई 2025 को दिल्ली हाई कोर्ट ने उनकी याचिका खारिज कर दी. इसके बाद परिवार ने सुप्रीम कोर्ट में अपील की. करीब आठ महीने बाद 11 मार्च 2026 को सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने हरीश को इच्छामृत्यु की इजाजत दे दी.

संवेदनशील मुद्दा बना चर्चा का केंद्र
हरीश राणा के मामले ने देश में इच्छामृत्यु जैसे संवेदनशील विषय पर एक नई बहस छेड़ दी है। यह घटना हमें न केवल कानूनी बल्कि मानवीय दृष्टिकोण से भी गहराई से सोचने पर मजबूर करती है।

Source link

Oil industry pitches ethanol as clean cooking fuel to cut LPG import dependence

Oil industry pitches ethanol as clean cooking fuel to cut LPG import dependence

As part of broader efforts to reduce India’s dependence on imported LPG and expand the biofuel ecosystem, the petroleum sector has urged industry stakeholders to explore ethanol as a clean cooking fuel for homes.RS Ravi, director (downstream), Federation of Indian Petroleum Industry (FIPI), raised the proposal while addressing the All India Distillers Association conference, pointing to the ongoing research on ethanol-based cooking stoves, PTI reported.

Watch

Two more Indian LPG ships Pine Gas and Jag Vasant transit Strait of Hormuz amid Iran-Israel war

He said “a lot of work is happening” at institutions like the LPG Equipment Research Center and several IITs to design efficient, ethanol-compatible stoves, prototypes of which are expected to be ready soon.Ravi called on the distillery industry to support this initiative by partnering with manufacturers to scale up stove production and helping develop an effective supply chain that can deliver ethanol directly to homes.“It’s a different game. Till now, the way you have been supporting the oil industry by supplying wholesale… that needs to change,” he said.“How this supply chain will be developed, what form it needs to be delivered in, the form factor is very important.”He further said, “Can AIDA come forward and give us ideas on how we can make this ethanol possible as a cooking fuel in India?”The suggestion comes at a time when India has already started blending 20 percent ethanol in petrol. Ravi credited the distillery sector for enabling the program and cited a recent government notification mandating the sale of E20 petrol with a minimum research octane number of 95 from April 1, 2026.The move to higher-octane E20 fuel is expected to improve vehicle performance and efficiency while eliminating concerns associated with lower-octane blends.Ravi also urged the ethanol industry to accelerate production of isobutanol for diesel blending and prepare for ethanol-to-sustainable aviation fuel pathways, although he stressed that priority attention should be given to cooking fuel initiatives.Research bodies are already investigating ethanol stoves as a clean alternative that can complement or partially replace LPG, especially in rural and semi-urban areas.He said shifting ethanol from bulk industrial supply to domestic distribution would require new logistics models, suitable packaging formats and reliable last-mile delivery systems.India is aggressively promoting ethanol blending to cut crude oil imports, conserve foreign exchange, reduce emissions and support farmers. Increasing the use of ethanol in cooking fuel can further diversify demand and strengthen energy security.Ravi stressed the need for coordinated efforts between the oil industry and distillers to make ethanol-based cooking a viable option in the country.

Source link

“Erika has a d***”: Candace Owens responds to viral clip targeting Erica Kirke, sparking fresh controversy

"Erica has an ad***": Candace Owens reacts to viral clip targeting Erica Kirk, sparking new controversy
Candace Owens responded to a viral clip about Erica Kirk, and used it to reinforce her ongoing criticism. He argued that these comments broadly reflected public opinion, leading to intense debate online. The clip, which drew mixed reactions, added fuel to the ongoing investigation from Owens’ documentary, where she questions Kirk’s background and public narrative, keeping the controversy active.

A short podcast clip has turned into a full-blown online talking point, drawing Candace Owens, Joe Rogan and Erica Kirk into a messy, fast-paced debate. What started as a casual exchange on a popular show didn’t stay casual for long. Within hours, the clip went viral on social media, garnering reactions, criticisms and curiosities.Candace Owens stepped up almost immediately. Instead of distancing herself from the moment, she leaned into it. His response added fuel to an already growing conversation, turning a viral clip into something that now feels more personal and candid.

Candace Owens sparks debate after viral comments about Erica Kirk resurface

After reposting the clip, Owens clarified his stance. “Oh no! It takes yet another commenter to point out the obvious fact that Erica’s behavior, conduct, and history is bizarre. Have you ever wondered how Joe Rogan stays on top? Because his conversations reflect how everyday people feel about a variety of topics,” he wrote, framing the situation as a reflection of public opinion rather than a controversy.The original clip comes from the March 21 episode of The Joe Rogan Experience. During the discussion, Rogan made a comment that immediately gained attention online: “I heard there’s an Erica Kirk commercial. I heard that.” This comment, blunt and unexpected, became the spark that pushed the clip into viral territory.As the conversation progressed, things got even stranger. Rogan referenced the unusual online video and said, “Maybe it was in some weird CIA documents or even CIA movies… Have you ever seen those movies? … See if you get those movies. There are some weird internal movies that they made that she was a part of,” leaving many listeners unsure whether to take the claims seriously.What makes this moment more profound is that it does not stand alone. Owens has already been openly critical of Erica Kirk in her recent documentary, where she questions parts of Kirk’s personal story and public image. This latest response seems like a continuation of that effort rather than a one-off response.This situation shows how quickly things can get out of control online. One video, a few comments, and suddenly, the conversation is much bigger than before.

Source link

‘Universal joke’: Rahul Gandhi says he has ‘compromised’ on PM Modi’s foreign policy. india news

'Under 100% control of Trump': Rahul Gandhi criticizes PM Modi over West Asia remarks in Lok Sabha

New Delhi: Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi Said that India’s foreign policy was a “personal” policy of Prime Minister Narendra Modi and called it a “universal joke”. He further alleged that the Prime Minister was “compromised”, and said that he was acting on the US President donald trumpInstructions of.“Our foreign policy is PM Modi‘s personal foreign policy… Everyone considers it a universal joke… Donald Trump knows exactly what PM Modi can and cannot do. If the Prime Minister is compromised, our foreign policy is compromised.”

Watch

‘Under 100% control of Trump’: Rahul Gandhi criticizes PM Modi over West Asia remarks in Lok Sabha

Expressing concern over the rising LPG and fuel prices in the country, he said that if the PM thinks that the situation will be like Covid, then he should remember the number of deaths during the pandemic. He said, “He gave an irrelevant speech in Parliament yesterday… It should seem like he is the Prime Minister of India, but there is no post… People will have to bear the brunt of this. This is just the beginning where LPG and petrol prices have increased… He claims that the situation will be like Covid, but he forgot how many people died during Covid and how many tragedies happened.”He said, “There should be an all-party meeting, but a structural mistake has been made… and it cannot be corrected, especially the Prime Minister cannot. He will do what America says and will not work in the interest of farmers and the country. He will do what America and Israel say.”PM Modi spoke in the Rajya Sabha earlier in the day and said that despite the ongoing conflict in West Asia, India has adequate crude oil reserves and a strong supply system.He said the country has expanded its strategic petroleum reserves and increased refining capacity, even as disruptions affect global trade through the Strait of Hormuz.He has also called an all-party meeting on Wednesday. Rahul said that he would not be able to attend the meeting saying that he had a program in the election state of Kerala.“I will not be able to attend it as I have a program in Kerala. There should have been an all-party meeting, but a structural mistake has been made,” he said.

Source link