Jordan Stephens (Image via Getty)

Jordan Stephens has shared his candid opinion after a viral clip showed Piers Morgan in a heated exchange with TikToker Harrison Sullivan, also known as HSTikkyTokky. The moment came following the release of Louis Theroux’s The Manosphere documentary on Netflix, in which Sullivan appeared. Soon after, Pierce invited him for an interview, but the conversation soon became tense and spread widely online.In a six-minute Instagram video, Jordan Stephens said the interview served no purpose. He felt that the discussion lacked depth and direction. According to him, the situation became exactly what Sullivan is known for, drawing reactions and attention. Jordan said Pierce should have expected this and handled it better from the beginning.

Jordan Stephens questions Piers Morgan’s interview approach with Harrison Sullivan

Jordan Stephens did not hold back in explaining his point. He said, “I was astounded by the mediocrity of Piers Morgan’s attitude towards this man. Even interviewing HS is pointless to him.” He believed the interview was more about attracting attention than getting anything meaningful across.He told that Harrison Sullivan had come prepared to provoke a reaction. “HS clearly came prepared to make him angry and Pierce completely fell for it,” Jordan said. He said that someone with Piers Morgan’s experience should have handled the situation more carefully.Jordan also told that the questions asked were not correct. Rather than trying to challenge Sullivan with moral arguments, he felt the interview should have explored his thinking. “There were more interesting questions to ask him,” he said. She suggested asking about beliefs, upbringing, and personal experiences to better understand their thoughts.He also noted that Sullivan is not a father, so his comments about rejecting a child cannot come from real life experience. Jordan said more research could have been done instead of just focusing on the arguments.Another issue Jordan raised was how people like Sullivan attract attention. He said that they grow because people react strongly to them. He explained, “Trying to bring someone on stage who is known for anger-promoting and then being anger-aggressive is completely wild and he should have been prepared.”Jordan also talked about a bigger issue. He said an important point missed in the documentary was how online platforms deliver such content to young audiences. According to him, the real concern lies here, because many young viewers are exposed to these ideas without even searching. He concluded by saying that people like Sullivan thrive on attention, but over time, such ideas may fade as people question them more.