More than 500 people were arrested during a pro-Palestine demonstration in London on Saturday in support of the banned group Palestine Action, according to police.In a post on X, the Metropolitan Police said, “523 people were arrested today for showing support for a banned organisation.”Earlier in the day, authorities had already detained more than 200 protesters at a sit-in demonstration in Trafalgar Square held in support of the Palestine action, which is banned in Britain. Police were seen removing the activists from the area while other protesters clapped and cheered. Participants held placards in support of the group, leading to further arrests.Palestine Action was classified as a terrorist organization in July last year, making becoming a member of it or expressing support for it a criminal offense punishable by up to 14 years in prison. In February, the London High Court launched a legal challenge to the ban, ruling that it interferes with the right to free speech. The government has since been given permission to appeal that decision.Following the High Court decision, the Metropolitan Police temporarily halted arrests, but confirmed later in March that enforcement would resume.Since the group was banned, there have been nearly 3,000 arrests, mostly of people holding placards in support of Palestine Action, and hundreds of people now face charges.One of the protesters, Denis McDermott, 73, of Edinburgh, said he had been arrested earlier but was released without hesitation. “I’m a supporter of these great people,” he said, pointing to fellow protesters, adding that if the court process had been decisive “there would have been no need for all this”.Organizers Defend Our Jury said around 500 people took part in Saturday’s protest, which it described as “the UK government’s complicity in Israel’s genocide in Gaza and its misguided crackdown on peaceful protests at home”.He also alleged that police were making arrests “despite the High Court ruling the government’s ban on the group was unlawful, and leading lawyers warning that any arrests would be unlawful”.The ban put Palestine Action on a list of banned organizations that also includes Palestinian militant group Hamas and the Lebanese Iran-backed group Hezbollah, and has sparked widespread reaction.A judge has now halted all trials involving individuals accused of supporting Palestine action, and scheduled a full review of the cases for July 30.Founded in 2020, Palestine Action says its aim, according to its now-blocked website, is to end “global complicity in Israel’s genocide and apartheid regime.”The group has primarily targeted weapons facilities, particularly those associated with Israeli defense firm Elbit Systems.

ISLAMABAD: The United States and Iran began face-to-face talks in Pakistan on Saturday, days after announcing a fragile, two-week ceasefire as the war that has killed thousands and roiled global markets enters its seventh week. The White House confirmed the direct nature of the talks, which are a rare example of high-level US government engagement with the Iranian government. Iran’s state news agency said three-party talks, including Pakistan, had begun after Iranian pre-conditions were met, including a reduction in Israeli attacks on southern Lebanon. “The formal round of direct talks between Iran and the US has officially started on Saturday evening after Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif held separate meetings with the US and Iranian delegations,” a senior Shehbaz administration official told PTI. The US delegation, led by Vice President J.D. Vance, and the Iranian delegation, led by Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf, were discussing how to advance a ceasefire already endangered by deep differences of opinion and Israel’s continued attacks against Hezbollah in Lebanon. Vance, accompanied by special envoy Steve Witkoff and President Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner, arrived in Islamabad hours after Qalibaf. Both delegations were welcomed by Pakistan’s Deputy PM Ishaq Dar and Army Chief Field Marshal Asim Munir at Rawalpindi’s Noor Khan airbase, which was damaged by Indian strikes during Operation Sindoor. Iranians wore black to mourn Ayatollah Khamenei and others killed in the war.

Chinese, Egyptian, Saudi and Qatari officials are in Islamabad to facilitate talks

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi was also part of the delegation. Since the Islamic Revolution in Iran in 1979, the most direct US contact occurred in September 2013 when President Barack Obama called newly elected President Hassan Rouhani to discuss Iran’s nuclear program. The highest-level meetings during talks on the program recently took place between Secretary of State John Kerry and his counterpart Mohammad Javad Zarif. Iran doubled down on parts of its earlier proposal, with its delegation telling Iranian state television that it had presented some of the plan’s ideas as “red lines” in meetings with Sharif. These included compensation for damage caused by the American-Israeli attacks that started the war on February 28. Reflecting the high stakes, officials in the region said Chinese, Egyptian, Saudi and Qatari officials were in Islamabad to indirectly facilitate the talks. He discussed the sensitive matter on condition of anonymity.

Donald Trump early Sunday doubled down on his victory rhetoric against Iran, claiming the US has destroyed Tehran’s military capabilities and warning China it would face serious consequences if it was found supplying arms to the Mojtaba Khamenei-led Islamic Republic.US President Donald Trump said, “…they have no navy, radar or air force. All their leaders are dead…For many years they ruled; they’re gone. With all that, let’s see what happens – but from my perspective, I don’t care.”On the news of China sending weapons to Iran, Trump said, ‘If China does this, then China is going to have a big problem.’“They have been meeting for several hours… We will see what happens. Despite this, we win… Maybe they make a deal; Maybe they don’t. It doesn’t matter. From America’s perspective, we win…the boats are going up and headed toward our country. We are filling huge tankers with oil and gas...”Responding to ANI’s question on whether the US will release Iranian assets, the MAGA supremo said, “We will see what happens. We are in deep talks with Iran, we win. We have defeated them militarily… We are clearing the straits… Whether we make a deal or not, it doesn’t matter to me – and the reason is that we win… We were not helped by NATO…”Meanwhile, the United States and Iran have resumed talks after more than a month of full-scale military aggression Pakistan Mediating efforts to defuse the crisis that led Tehran to close the Strait of Hormuz, disrupting global trade.Days after announcing a fragile two-week ceasefire, the two sides began direct talks in Islamabad on Saturday, marking a rare face-to-face interaction.The US delegation is led by JD Vance along with special envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner. The Iranian side is led by Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf and Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi.

California Representative Eric Swalwell, the front-runner in the race for governor, is facing allegations of sexual harassment and misconduct by four women, including a former aide who claims he raped her.The allegations include a high-profile Democrat using his political stature to groom young women in their 20s before sending inappropriate sexual messages or engaging in non-consensual physical contact, CNN reports. Swalwell is a married father of three and issued a denial. He called the claims “false” and politically motivated lies meant to disrupt the upcoming election.His legal team has already issued cease and desist letters to the two accused and warned them of legal action if they continue speaking out. However, medical records, text messages, and corroborating statements from friends and family members have emerged to support the women’s accounts.

Former employee: allegations of rape and physical injury

The most serious allegation comes from a woman who began interning for Swalwell in 2019 when she was 20. She eventually joined his campaign and district office, where she says the congressman initially made her feel “like the coolest person in the room.”She alleges that after a night of heavy drinking in September 2019, she blacked out and woke up naked in Swalwell’s hotel room. She said she could “physically feel” that sexual contact had occurred. In a separate incident the same year, she claimed he pressured her to perform oral sex on him in the car.The woman alleges the abuse culminated at a New York City event in April 2024. She says she regained consciousness in Swalwell’s bed after becoming extremely intoxicated after drinking at the hotel bar.“I was pushing him away by saying no,” she told CNN. “He didn’t stop.”She described waking up alone the next morning, wrapped in blankets, with “cuts and bruises” on her ribs and thighs. CNN reviewed medical records from the health clinic where she went to get tested a few days later, where a provider referred to her as “a survivor.”

Political aspirant: A ‘blurry’ in the hotel room

A second woman, who connected with the congressman over her interest in Democratic politics in 2025, described turning a similarly “starstruck” compliment into a traumatic experience. After messaging for several weeks, the pair met in person when Swalwell was visiting her hometown.She alleges that during one night at a bar, Swalwell repeatedly touched and kissed her feet without consent. Eventually she lost her memory of the evening and woke up in her hotel room. Uber receipts show she left the hotel at 5:41 am.The woman described her experience as “blurring” and said she felt “disgusted and embarrassed”. When she later messaged Swalwell telling him “What you did hurt me,” he replied: “I won’t bother you again! Sorry.”

Eli Samarco: Unwanted Nudity and Late Night Running

Social media creator Ellie Sammarco is one of the women who chose her name. She first reached out to Swalwell on Twitter in 2021 to discuss politics. What started as professional advice soon turned into an “inappropriate” Snapchat exchange.Samarco claims the congressman sent her unsolicited photos of his genitals and shirtless selfies while he was drinking. She said that when she was 24 and out with friends, it was a sitting congressman who was “drunk texting” her.She also alleged that Swalwell would drive past her apartment building several times after learning where she lived. Although they remained in occasional contact, she said that he stopped responding to her sexual advances after they entered a serious relationship.

Marketing Professionals: The Four-Year Pattern of Clear Content

A fourth woman, who worked in marketing, alleged that Swalwell began contacting her in 2021 after liking her social media posts. She told CNN that after a month their conversations turned sexual, with the congressman requesting her to send nude photos and unsolicited videos of his penis.“When you’re sent unsolicited d**k videos, it makes you feel like I’m less of a human being,” he said.The two never met in person, but the digital relationship lasted for four years.

More than 200 people, including musician Robert Del Naja of the band Massive Attack, were arrested during a mass protest in central London against the ban on activist group Palestine Action. Hundreds of people defied police warnings and gathered at a demonstration in Trafalgar Square on Saturday.The Metropolitan Police confirmed that 212 individuals aged between 27 and 82 were detained for allegedly showing support for a banned organisation. Authorities said the protests “have the potential to be abusive rather than legitimate expression.”

Musicians are also among those detained

Del Naja, also known as 3D, was seen sitting among the protesters holding a sign that read, “I oppose genocide, I support Palestine action.” Officers later approached him, informed him of his arrest, and he was led away as fellow protesters cheered and raised their voices in support.In video clips circulated online, onlookers chanted enthusiastically as officers picked up the musician and took him away. Del Naja reportedly described his arrest as “unlawful” and had previously acknowledged concerns about possible consequences for his international touring career.

Scenes of defiance and disruption

The protest included a mix of participants, including elderly protesters sitting in camping chairs and others standing with signs. Several individuals were seen physically carried away by police, while some elderly protesters were taken away in police vans.As soon as the arrests were made, slogans of “Shame on you” started echoing. Witnesses also accused authorities of using excessive force in some cases, including dragging protesters without proper support.Some protesters wore symbolic costumes, including suffrage-style clothing and masks depicting political figures, while banners raised broader concerns about free speech and civil liberties.

Legal battle increases tension

The arrests come amid an ongoing legal dispute over the government’s decision to ban Palestine action. Earlier this year, the High Court ruled the ban illegal, forcing the police to briefly halt arrests. However, enforcement resumed after authorities launched an appeal, which is expected to take several months.Police say that despite ongoing court proceedings, expressing support for a banned organization is an offense under the Terrorism Act.

Organizers vow to continue resistance

The protest was organized by the campaign group Defend Our Juries, which described the vote as a sign that resistance to the ban remains “stronger than ever”.The group argues that the issue extends beyond a single organization and threatens broader rights of protest and free expression.Participants echoed similar sentiments, warning that a ban on one group could set a precedent to stifle dissent more widely.Former senior police officers noted the operational difficulty of handling large crowds willing to risk arrest. With hundreds of people involved, the situation posed logistical and reputational challenges to law enforcement.Observers also highlighted growing public sympathy towards the protesters, even as authorities continued to enforce the law.More than 3,000 people have been arrested since the Palestine crackdown was banned last year, according to police figures, with the majority of cases reported in London.

Today’s Quote by Abraham Lincoln

People are often evaluated based on what other people see or hear about them in their daily lives. The way people see and think about someone can affect how they are treated in society. But this view is not always a complete picture of who they really are. This is where Abraham Lincoln’s quote comes in handy. This makes it clear what is real and what is not.Abraham Lincoln was a great leader during one of the most difficult times in American history. He often spoke in a simple but important way. His words are important even today because they talk about basic human values. He uses a simple comparison to make a complex idea easier to understand. He says that character is like a tree and reputation is like its shadow. They are both related, but they are not the same.This idea is simple to understand, but it has a lot of meaning. It reminds people that what other people think is not always the whole truth. This also shows how important it is to pay more attention to your internal values ​​than your external image. Let’s look at what this quote means and why it still matters today.

today’s thought By former US President Abraham Lincoln

“Character is like a tree, and reputation is like its shadow. The shadow is what we think of it; the tree is the real thing.”

Understanding the Meaning of Abraham Lincoln’s Quote

The quote uses a picture of nature to explain a human idea. A tree is solid, real and has depth. It grows larger over time and represents something that exists in its own right. On the other hand, shadow is just a reflection. It changes depending on lighting, angle and viewpoint.Lincoln is talking about a person’s true nature when he compares character to a tree. Honesty, integrity, and actions that reflect who a person really is are all parts of character. It grows over time and is created by doing the same thing over and over again.He says that reputation is like a shadow that reflects how other people see a person. This can change rapidly depending on what people think, hear or don’t know. It can’t always show the whole picture, just like a shadow.

Why is character more important than reputation?

People often care more about their reputation because it is easier to see. It affects how people accept you, how many job opportunities you have, and how people view you in public. But sometimes, reputations can be wrong.On the other hand, character remains the same even when no one is looking. It helps people make choices and act. Lincoln’s quote makes it clear that true value lies in character, not in what other people think of it.This idea is important because it shifts the focus from how things appear to how they really are. It encourages people to develop strong values ​​rather than just worrying about how they look.

How is prestige built in society?

People often build their reputations based on how they behave in public, how they talk to others and how they interact with others. There are many things that can influence this, such as media, social networks, and personal relationships.Reputation can change rapidly because it is based on how people perceive things. An incident or misunderstanding can change the way people view someone. It is just like the shadow changes when the light changes.Lincoln’s comparison makes clear why reputation should not be considered the sole criterion for evaluating a person. It’s just a part, and it may not always be correct.

Role of Karmas in Character Building

Character is not built in a moment. It grows over time through regular actions. Every choice, whether big or small, affects who a person is.Being honest with the people you meet every day, being responsible at work, and treating others with respect are all parts of character. These traits may not be immediately apparent, but over time they will shape a person.Lincoln’s quote reminds us that character is what matters most. Reputation may follow, but that’s not what’s really going on.

Relevance of the quote to real life

You can use this idea in many parts of your life. At work people are often evaluated based on how well they do their job and how others view them. Reputation may help you get ahead, but character is what will help you succeed in the long run.In personal relationships, trust is built by doing the same thing over and over again. First impressions may shape people’s opinions, but over time, true character emerges.People often evaluate leaders on the basis of their reputation in public life. But history usually remembers them because of who they were and what they did.

A Simple Comparison That Explains a Complex Truth

One reason this quote is still popular is because it is simple. The picture of the tree and its shadow is easy to understand. But it does a good job of showing the difference between what is real and what we perceive to be real.The tree remains even when there is shadow. The tree remains the same, even if the shadow changes or goes away. In the same way, a person’s character is different from his reputation.This comparison helps people see that what other people think of them does not define who they really are.

Other famous quotes from Abraham Lincoln

Why does this message still matter today?

In today’s world, where information spreads rapidly, reputations can change in an instant. Social media and other digital platforms make it easy for people to form opinions instantly. In such a situation the distinction between character and reputation becomes even more important.Lincoln’s quote reminds us that reputation may change how people see us, but it does not define who we are. The true value of a person lies in his actions, choices and honesty.This message remains important today because it speaks to a basic human need. People want to know who they really are, not just how others see them.

A conclusion from Lincoln’s perspective

The quote makes a clear point. Character is what really makes a person who he is, while reputation is what other people think of him. They are both related, but they are not the same.People can build a strong and stable identity by focusing on their character. Your character remains the same, but your reputation may change over time.It’s easy to see the difference from the words of Abraham Lincoln. They tell people to look beyond how they look and focus on what really makes them who they are.

Immigration lawyers say scrutiny of marriage-based green card applications in the US has been tightened in recent months, with applicants facing tougher scrutiny during interviews and increased enforcement action even at the interview stage. Marriage is one of the most common routes to permanent residence, but lawyers warn that the process is now being scrutinized more closely than before.According to immigration attorney Douglas Lightman of Lightman Law Firm LLC in New York, “Obtaining a green card through marriage is one of the most common routes to lawful permanent residence in the United States. It is also one of the fastest routes to permanent residence, with some applicants receiving approval in just 9 to 15 months.”However, he and other lawyers note that this is one of the riskiest routes, as applicants must clearly prove that the marriage is genuine and not undertaken for immigration benefits.A marriage-based green card allows the foreign spouse of a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident to live and work anywhere in the country. The type of green card issued depends on how long the couple has been married at the time of approval.Attorney Lightman explains that there are two main categories. A 10-year green card is issued to spouses who have been married for more than two years when their application is approved. It is also known as IR-1 visa. A 2-year conditional green card is issued when there are less than two years left before the marriage can be approved. This is known as a CR-1 visa and the couple must later file Form I-751 to have the conditions removed.US citizens can often file Form I-130 and Form I-485 together for faster processing, but spouses of green card holders usually have to wait longer due to visa limits and quotas.Eligibility rules will remain strict. Immigration attorney Matthew Curtis explains, “The marriage must be legally valid with a government-issued marriage certificate. USCIS recently updated its policy to clarify that only marriages that are legally recognized and registered with civil authorities are eligible. Both spouses must be legally free to marry, all previous marriages must have been properly ended through divorce, annulment, or death.“In addition to the paperwork, applicants must also meet a standard known as the bona fide marriage standard, which is often the most closely scrutinized part of the case. “USCIS examines whether you and your spouse share a life together through financial entanglement, cohabitation, and emotional connection. The burden of proof is entirely on you,” says Curtis.Couples are expected to present strong supporting evidence. “Joint financial accounts demonstrate financial interdependence,” says Lightman. Housing documents proving that you live together. Photos spanning the period of your relationship document the time you spent together. Affidavits from friends and family provide third-party verification. Travel records, communication records and receipts from joint purchases all strengthen your case.“At the same time, lawyers warn that some factors may raise alarm bells. “Things like significant age difference, limited shared language, immediate marriage after very short courtship, living at different addresses, minimal joint financial documentation, and previous marriages to U.S. citizens warrant increased scrutiny,” says Curtis.Financial needs also remain central. Lightman explains that sponsors must prove they can support their spouse at 125% of the federal poverty guidelines, which requires an income of about $25,550 for a two-person family. If this is not met, applicants may rely on a joint sponsor, joint household income, or qualifying assets.