CSK lost against LSG by 7 wickets (Image: IPL/BCCI)

Chennai Super Kings batting coach michael hussey He admitted that the five-time champions now have no margin for error after their defeat to Lucknow Supergiants left their IPL 2026 playoff hopes hanging in the balance.CSK suffered a huge blow on Friday when LSG chased down 188 runs with ease thanks to a blistering inning of 90 runs in 38 balls. Michelle Marsh On a live Ikana Stadium surface. After this defeat, Chennai is left with 12 points from 13 matches, which means that to qualify for the playoffs, it will now have to win both the remaining league games, as well as depend on other results.Despite the difficult situation, Hussey remained optimistic and said that the team would treat each remaining match as a knockout match.“Well, I mean, I really like this time of the tournament because it feels like every game is like a final, you know, and we are in that position now,” Hussey said, adding that CSK now need to win both of their remaining games as well as rely on some other results to go their way.“We have to win our last two matches. I mean, I haven’t studied the table that closely. Yes, there are a lot of teams competing for probably the last few spots in the top four,” he said.“This is where (the tournament stage) the pressure is really on everyone, not just on us, but on all the other teams as well. And you can see some strange things happening. So we still have a chance… we still believe we can get through it,” he said during the post-match press conference.Speaking during the post-match presentation after the match, Gaikwad remained calm despite the setback and insisted that the qualification scenario is “simple” for his team to move forward.“Okay, the first challenge is facing Chennai. It’s a long flight. After that, just make sure that we come back and improve on what areas we need to improve and yes, try to adapt and assess the situations as quickly as possible and it is a simple calculation for us. No matter how many games we play, we win every game. So I guess nothing is simple. I mean, it’s simple, nothing complicated. It’s very easy for us here. Nothing to worry about. Just make sure we have a good day. “Whoever has a good day, count it and hope we change things,” Gaikwad said.

When the Aura bells start ringing in the city, you just know it Tom Cruise. The stylish actor had stepped out of his helicopter and landed at a London helipad earlier this week. Recently, soon after the announcement of the production of the blockbuster film’s threequel, ‘Top Gun 3’, the 63-year-old star was seen all in black as rain covered the sky.

Tom Cruise steps out in all black in London

There was excitement on social media apps after the box-office hit ‘Top Gun: Maverick’ was confirmed to be getting a sequel. However, according to People Magazine, the ‘Jerry Maguire’ actor has been hopping through intense movies and was spotted riding to the United Kingdom on May 14, 2026. Clad in a black outfit, the actor wore a collared black jacket and black slacks with subtle shades. He was seen greeting the airport staff and holding his umbrella even during light drizzle.

Tom Cruise returns to ‘Top Gun’ franchise

Earlier this year, it was revealed that Tom Cruise would be taking to the skies once again during a presentation at CinemaCon. However, according to The Guardian, no other returning cast members have been confirmed for the action drama. “We’re thinking and talking about a lot of different stories and what we can do and what’s possible,” he told an Australian show Today last year. “It took me 35 years to figure out Top Gun: Maverick. So, there’s all these things we’re working on, we’re discussing Days of Thunder and Top Gun: Maverick.”

Tom Cruise signs another film?

While whispers are growing about Tom Cruise’s next film, he is reportedly in talks on another spy film titled ‘Doppelganger’. Jeff Snyder’s entertainment newspaper, The InSnyder, claimed that the actor spoke to the writer Anish Chaganti.

Galileo Galilei (Image: Wikipedia)

People often assume that old quotes survive because they sound wise. Sometimes they survive because they seem uncomfortably accurate.Citation: “There are people who reason well, but they far outnumber those who reason poorly.” This line of Galileo Galilei seems to be one of those lines.This doesn’t sound poetic. It’s not even warm or comfortable. If anything, there’s a slight sense of frustration in the sentence, almost like someone who has spent years watching intelligent conversations drown out noise.And honestly, many people today probably understand that sentiment immediately.The strange thing is that Galileo lived centuries before smartphones, social media debates, viral misinformation and endless online debates. Yet this quote somehow fits modern life almost perfectly. Every day, people confidently debate topics they barely understand. Rumors spread faster than facts. Emotional reactions constantly override careful thinking.Galileo may not have predicted the Internet, but he clearly understood human behavior.That part never changes much.

Quote of the Day by Galileo Galilei

“There are people who argue well, but they far outnumber those who argue poorly.”

Why does this quote from Galileo suddenly feel like it’s everywhere online?

In recent years, this line has begun to circulate more frequently online, perhaps because people feel mentally exhausted by the sheer volume of bad arguments surrounding them on a daily basis.Open almost any social media platform, and patterns are immediately visible.People react even before reading it completely. Headlines become opinions. Short clips replace the reference. Anger spreads faster than patience. Confidence is always mistaken for intelligence. Sometimes the loudest person in the room knows the least, yet dominates the conversation because certainty feels persuasive.Galileo’s quote sums them all up with great simplicity.He is essentially saying that thoughtful logic exists, but irrational thinking numerically overwhelms it. Not because good thinkers disappear completely. Simply because emotional thinking often spreads more naturally among larger groups.That observation seems harsh. This also sounds familiar.

Galileo understood something uncomfortable about human nature

Galileo Galilei spent much of his life challenging widely accepted beliefs about the universe. That experience probably shaped the way he viewed public argument.Galileo supported the idea that the Earth revolved around the Sun, which was fiercely opposed by many powerful institutions during his lifetime. For many people at that time, evidence mattered less than tradition, authority, and emotional certainty.That struggle changed his life permanently.He eventually faced trial by the Roman Inquisition and remained under house arrest for years. Imagine experiencing this personally: carefully presenting evidence while vast groups reject it because the conclusions seem uncomfortable or threatening.After going through this, his quote suddenly seems less pejorative and more observational.Galileo saw firsthand how poorly people can reason when pride, fear, ideology, or social pressure are involved.

This line seems strangely personal now

What makes this quote powerful today is that people no longer have to deal with bad logic occasionally. They face it constantly.A person can wake up, check their phone for five minutes, and see misinformation, emotional outcry, conspiracy theories, manipulated statistics, and outright self-indulgent nonsense even before breakfast. Over time, this creates fatigue. Many people feel mentally exhausted, not because the information is there, but because it requires constant effort to separate good logic from bad logic.Galileo’s quote captures that weariness almost perfectly.This sentence sounds less like philosophy and more like someone’s silent admission: “Yes, this has always been a problem.”

Why is it really hard to reason well?

Most people believe that arguments happen naturally. Galileo seems to disagree.Good reasoning requires patience. It demands evidence, self-control, and a willingness to question personal assumptions. Humans struggle with this more than they usually admit. People quickly become emotionally attached to ideas. Once this happens, changing perspective feels uncomfortable because it involves identity.This is where bad logic often begins.One stops to ask, “Is this true?” Instead they begin to ask, “How do I defend what I already believe?”They are completely different mental processes. Galileo seems to be deeply aware of that distinction.

The Internet rewards emotions over logic

One reason this quote seems unusually modern is that online culture often rewards emotional reaction rather than thoughtful analysis.Fast responses perform well online. Anger also performs well. Careful nuances usually do not occur.People who share emotional certainty attract attention faster than individuals who express uncertainty or complexity. Algorithms reward participation, not intellectual discipline. This creates an environment where bad arguments spread faster because emotionally satisfying explanations spread faster than complex truths.Galileo clearly lived centuries before algorithms came into existence, yet his observations still land squarely inside modern digital culture.Maybe that’s why young audiences keep searching for this quote again and again.

Galileo was not alone in attacking the intelligence system.

This quote is interesting because Galileo does not simply divide people into “smart” and “stupid.” The issue itself is one of logic.A highly educated person can still reason badly emotionally. History proves this time and again. Intelligent people sometimes defend irrational beliefs because ego, politics, fear, loyalty, or pride distort their thinking. Meanwhile, ordinary people without formal education can reason carefully because they remain curious, patient, and open-minded.Galileo seems to be more interested in intellectual honesty than in raw intelligence. That distinction matters.A person can remember vast amounts of information even when approaching questions emotionally rather than rationally. Good argument requires humility, which many people struggle to practice consistently.

Why does a crowd often make an argument worse?

Hidden within Galileo’s words is another inconvenient truth: groups do not become intelligent simply because they are large.People often assume that the majority opinion is the truth. History repeatedly shows otherwise.At one time the entire society believed in scientifically wrong ideas for centuries. Public panic, conspiratorial movements, propaganda campaigns, and moral hysteria all show how irrational group thinking can yield under pressure.Galileo experienced that reality personally.He observed that institutions and large groups reject evidence because accepting it threatens existing beliefs. That experience likely shaped his understanding of how emotionally fragile rational thinking can become when fear or power enter the equation.

This quote seems almost sarcastic

What makes this line memorable is its tone. Galileo looks tired.Not dramatic. Not furious. Just quietly know that most of the time illogical thinking far outnumbers careful reasoning. That understated disappointment gives the quote personality. The reader can almost imagine someone saying this after losing patience during a meaningless argument.And honestly, a lot of people today can probably relate to that mood. Especially online.The Internet has created endless opportunities for debate, while simultaneously narrowing attention spans and rewarding oversimplification. Discussions often devolve into tribal shouting rather than genuine curiosity. People defend “their side” emotionally rather than openly examining the facts.Galileo’s statement fits that environment almost exactly.

Why do people keep sharing this quote even after centuries?

Some historical quotations survive primarily because schools continue to teach them. It survives because it still feels emotionally useful.Readers now encounter bad logic constantly in daily life. At work. Online. Politically. Socially. Even in normal conversation. Galileo’s words provide a strange reassurance as they remind people that this problem is not entirely new.Man has always struggled with rational thinking.Technology changed. Human psychology mostly did not do this.That continuity probably explains why the quote keeps returning online every few months. People read it and immediately recognize that there is something true in it.

Other famous quotes from Galileo Galilei

Why do Galileo’s observations still matter?

The uncomfortable thing about this quote is that it denies easy optimism.Galileo is not saying that everyone eventually becomes rational through education or progress. He seems to recognize that flawed reasoning is deeply human. Emotional thinking comes naturally. Reasoning carefully requires effort, discipline, and a willingness to temporarily feel uncertainty.Many people object to that inconvenience.Yet despite the pessimistic edge of the quote, there is still some strange hope within it. Galileo acknowledges that some people argue well. Thoughtful thinking exists even when surrounded by noise. Curiosity still exists. Evidence still matters. Rational people still continue to ask hard questions despite the public confusion around them.Maybe this is enough. Or maybe it always has been.

File photo: US President Donald Trump

us President donald trump Iran faces mounting pressure over war as China returns Friday, with top aides laying out options for fresh military action against Tehran if diplomacy fails.According to a New York Times report, Pentagon officials have drafted a plan for the possible resumption of strikes as part of a renewed military campaign after “Operation Epic Fury” was halted during the ceasefire in April. However, Trump has not yet taken a final decision.“I looked at it, and if I didn’t like the first sentence I would throw it out,” Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One, referring to Iran’s latest peace proposal.The US, Israel and regional officials are trying to broker a deal that would allow Iran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, giving Trump a chance to claim a diplomatic breakthrough amid growing domestic criticism over the costly conflict, the report said.

Pentagon prepares options for escalation

War Secretary Pete Hegseth told lawmakers this week that the U.S. military has a “plan to surge if necessary” while also keeping options open to reducing the deployment.The report said the Pentagon has prepared several military scenarios, including an intense bombing campaign targeting Iranian military and infrastructure sites.Another option reportedly involves deploying US special operations troops to secure highly enriched uranium believed to be stored deep underground at Iran’s Isfahan nuclear facility.According to the New York Times, several hundred special operations personnel were flown to the Middle East earlier this year to prepare for such contingencies. However, officials acknowledged that any ground operation would carry “significant risk of casualties” and would require thousands of support troops.Meanwhile, Iran signaled readiness for renewed hostilities. Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf said, “Our armed forces are ready to respond appropriately to any aggression.”

The Strait of Hormuz remains a matter of central concern

The Strait of Hormuz remains at the center of the crisis, with Iran refusing to fully reopen the key oil transit route, while the US has maintained its blockade measures.Trump said after talks with Chinese President Xi Jinping that both Washington and Beijing agreed that the strait should be reopened.“We don’t want them to have nuclear weapons, we want the door open,” Trump said in Beijing.Trump said he was running out of patience with Iran and warned Tehran to “compromise.”However, China avoided publicly indicating that it would put direct pressure on Iran.Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi said Tehran was open to diplomacy, but did not trust Washington after air strikes following previous talks.

Heavy military presence remains in the area

More than 50,000 US troops, two aircraft carriers, several destroyers and numerous warplanes are deployed throughout the region.According to the report, US General Dan Kaine said that military officials “retain and will continue to have multiple options for our civilian leaders”.Despite weeks of attacks, US intelligence assessments indicate that Iran has restored access to most of its missile launch facilities and underground military infrastructure.The report also said Tehran had gained operational access to 30 of its 33 missile sites along the Strait of Hormuz.Oil prices continued to rise amid hike fears. Brent crude climbed nearly 3% to nearly $109 a barrel, while concerns over prolonged disruption to Gulf shipping routes pushed U.S. Treasury yields to their highest in almost a year.

22.1 million excess deaths Recorded globally between 2020 and 2023New Delhi: According to the World Health Statistics 2026 report released by the World Health Organization (WHO), the Covid-19 pandemic caused an estimated 22.1 million excess deaths globally between 2020 and 2023, almost three times the seven million Covid deaths officially reported worldwide.WHO said the pandemic wiped out nearly a decade of gains in global life expectancy and healthy life expectancy by 2021, calling it a “shock of historic proportions” to global health systems.According to the report, global life expectancy declined by 1.8 years between 2019 and 2021, while healthy life expectancy fell by 1.5 years during the same period, the sharpest reversal in recent decades.The report said excess mortality peaked in 2021 with 10.4 million excess deaths recorded globally as health care systems came under severe strain. Excess deaths are expected to decline to 4.9 million in 2022 and 3.3 million in 2023, although WHO cautioned that the recovery remains uneven and many countries have still not returned to pre-pandemic health trajectories.WHO defines excess deaths as more deaths than would normally be expected during a given period, including direct Covid deaths and indirect deaths caused by disruptions in health services and delays in treatment.The report found that men were disproportionately affected, with age-standardized excess mortality rates nearly 50% higher among men than women at the peak of the pandemic in 2021. Older adults suffered the highest mortality rates, especially those over the age of 85.WHO also highlighted major weaknesses in global death surveillance exposed during the pandemic. Of the estimated 61 million deaths globally in 2023, only about 21 million had officially reported cause of death information to WHO, while only 12 million had medically certified ICD-coded mortality data.The agency said the pandemic severely disrupted essential health services around the world, including vaccination programs, tuberculosis and HIV services, and treatment of non-communicable diseases, contributing significantly to indirect deaths during the period.WHO had earlier estimated in a separate analysis for 2022 that India caused about 4.74 million excess deaths during 2020–21, a figure disputed by the Indian government.The report also warns of slow progress in universal health coverage, rising health care-related poverty and a decline in global health financing after the pandemic.

pete davidson And Elsie Hewitt’s relationship has been in the news recently. While there were rumors of the two’s separation, several other reports confirmed that the two were trying to work things out. However, according to the latest news, just 5 months after welcoming their child into the world, the two have officially called it quits. Here’s everything we know about the case.

peat davidson And elsie Hewitt parted ways by mutual consent

According to a new report from PEOPLE, Pete Davidson and Elsie Hewitt have officially split after dating for almost a year. The two also welcomed their child in December last year. Reportedly, the two could not work together on the problems they were facing in their relationship and have decided to part ways with mutual consent. Not only that, but they also aim to become “friends” in the future when things are better for them.“They aren’t getting along at the moment. They were already struggling a bit while Elsie was pregnant. Things happened so fast between them and they didn’t know each other very well,” the report said.However, for the sake of their child, they are attempting to work things out and are choosing to focus primarily on co-parenting. “She’s (Elsie Hewitt) not fighting Pete over seeing the baby, but it’s not easy. Ultimately, they would like to be friends and work together, but it’s hard to think about getting to that place right now.”

About Pete Davidson and Elsie Hewitt

For those unaware, the pair were first linked together when news of their dating surfaced in March last year. They were seen together in public on several occasions and were seen going on dates. Last December, they announced that Hewitt had given birth to their daughter, Scottie Rose. She was named after Davidson’s late father, Scott Matthew Davidson.Since announcing the news to the world, they’ve both been eager to share glimpses of their everyday life as new parents online. From selfies to rare glimpses of their newborn daughter, the duo proudly shared moments from their lives online. In March, the duo had celebrated their daughter’s 12-week completion and had also posted about the same. Hewitt wrote that on the way to the hospital, the two of them tried to guess what time their child would be born.

What happened between Benny Johnson and Marjorie Taylor Greene? YouTuber faces serious charges during Thomas Massey controversy (Image via Getty)

Benny Johnson and Marjorie Taylor Greene are now in the middle of a heated public battle online, and it all started because of fresh claims involving Congressman Thomas Massie. On May 14, debate erupted on X when Green shared a post criticizing YouTube’s coverage of allegations made against Macy by Johnson’s alleged ex-girlfriend, Cynthia West. The claims came just days before Massey’s primary election in Kentucky, which quickly turned into a political and social media storm.The situation escalated when Green accused social media influencers of being “paid to spread propaganda.” Benny Johnson hit back soon after, saying that he was simply covering a major trending story for his audience. From here both sides started making sharp allegations against each other by making long public posts. While Johnson defended his reporting, Green accused him of spreading lies and using other people’s material. Meanwhile, Thomas Massey also publicly denied all the allegations against him and described them as politically motivated ahead of the elections.

The online confrontation began when an X user named BobbySauce criticized Benny Johnson’s latest YouTube video about Thomas Massey. In the video, Johnson discussed allegations from Cynthia West, who reportedly claimed that Macy gave her hush money during their previous relationship. Marjorie Taylor Greene reposted that criticism on May 14 and wrote about influencers getting “paid to spread propaganda.” That post immediately caught Johnson’s attention.Johnson responded directly to Green, writing: “I cover trending news topics on my show. The Macy’s allegations and your South American mansion were the number one trending topic on this platform. I am entitled to my opinion on these matters. I serve my audience. This is my job. And unlike you, I won’t walk away from my job when things get tough.”Shortly thereafter, Green responded in even more strongly worded terms. He called Johnson “a lying scoundrel” and accused him of spreading “common lies” for money. He also noted previous media allegations involving Johnson, including claims related to Russia, Israel, Orthodox conferences and content theft. Green questioned why he never discussed those allegations on his platform.Johnson later responded with another lengthy statement. He said Green’s comments were “evidence-free slander” and defended his reporting. She also criticized Greene on immigration and border issues, saying: “What you said about me is evidence-free slander. But what I said about you is true.” At the same time, Thomas Macy publicly denied all allegations made against him by Cynthia West. Messi said in his statement:“It is sad that a week before this election people are making false and baseless allegations about me in a clear attempt to influence the outcome of this election. All claims of inappropriate conduct are false. I have never offered anyone money in exchange for their silence.”He also said: “No ethics claims have been filed against me, nor have any claims ever been filed against me in my 14 years in office. I have consulted with legal counsel, and we are considering all options.” As of now, Marjorie Taylor Greene has not publicly responded to Benny Johnson’s latest post.