Arthur Ferry’s stellar run at Wimbledon continued on Tuesday as the British wildcard scored the biggest win of his career, defeating ninth seed Flavio Coboli to reach the semi-finals.
Ranked world No. 114 when the Grand Slam began, the 23-year-old has become the story of the championship. By defeating Grigor Dimitrov in the very first tournament, Ferry backed it up with another fearless performance against the ItaliansReached the semi-finals of the tournament by defeating him 6-4, 7-6(4), 6-0.
On Wednesday, 8 July, Arthur became only the second wildcard in Wimbledon history to reach the semi-finals. The only player before him to achieve this feat was Goran Ivanisevic, who won the championship in 2001 by defeating Australia’s Patrick Rafter.
Photo: Reuters
Who is Arthur Ferry?
For many tennis fans, Ferry’s success has come as a surprise. But his journey to Center Court took years.
Born in Sevres, France, on July 12, 2002, Ferry moved to London when he was just one month old and grew up in Wimbledon, just a few miles from the All England Club. She attended King’s College School before choosing a different path to professional tennis by attending Stanford University in the United States.
Rather than turn professional as a teenager, Ferry spent three years developing his game in college tennis. He became a two-time ITA All-American, was named the 2023 Pac-12 Singles Player of the Year, and reached No. 1 in the national collegiate singles rankings in 2022, becoming Stanford’s first top-ranked singles player since Bob Bryan in 1998. In three seasons, he compiled an impressive 58–16 singles record while excelling in doubles.
Tennis runs in the family. His mother, Olivia Ferry, played professionally and competed in the women’s doubles draw at the 1991 French Open before representing Hong Kong in the Fed Cup after moving there. His father, Loïc Ferry, is a French businessman and president of French football club FC Lorient.
Arthur Fairey’s junior career
Ferry was also a very accomplished junior. He reached the third round of the Wimbledon boys’ singles in 2019, reached the boys’ doubles semi-finals at Wimbledon the same year, and repeated that feat at the 2020 Australian Open. He also represented Great Britain at the European Championships in 2019.
Despite those credentials, few expected him to make such a long run this fortnight. Entering Wimbledon as a wildcard, Ferry started the season outside the world top 180 before steadily climbing the rankings. His performance in London will now take him closer to the world top 60, making him Britain’s new No. 2 behind Cameron Norrie.
Speaking after one of her previous wins, Ferry admitted that playing at Wimbledon felt like a “full-circle moment” after spending much of her childhood watching the tournament from the stands.
That dream has now become even bigger. After eliminating Koboli, the British wildcard is just one win away from making the Wimbledon final, completing one of the most remarkable success stories of the season.
Former Afghanistan fast bowler Shapoor Zadran He died at the age of 38 after battling hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH), a rare immune system disorder. He was undergoing treatment in Delhi-NCR region for several months. His death was confirmed by the Afghanistan Cricket Board during his tenure as the President of the International Cricket Council (ICC). Jai Shah Also paid tribute to Zadran by remembering his huge contribution to Afghanistan cricket.Sharing his condolences on the X, Shah praised Zadran for helping Afghanistan establish themselves in international cricket. He also recalled his all-round performance against Scotland in the 2015 ODI World Cup that led Afghanistan to their first World Cup win. He wrote, “Deeply saddened by the passing of former Afghan cricketer Shapoor Zadran at the age of 38. Shapoor played a key role in Afghanistan’s remarkable rise to international cricket and will always be remembered for his match-winning all-round performance against Scotland in 2015.” ICC Cricket World CupWhich ensured Afghanistan’s first World Cup victory. Our heartfelt condolences to his family, friends and the entire Afghanistan cricket community. May his soul rest in peace.”The Afghanistan Cricket Board described Zadran as one of the pioneers of the country’s cricket journey, saying, “Shapoor Zadran was one of the founding figures of Afghanistan cricket, whose dedication, passion and unwavering commitment played a vital role in the rise and development of the game in our country. He was one of those proud cricketers who stood at the center of Afghanistan’s early cricket journey and helped pave the way that brought Afghan cricket to the international stage.”” It added, “Throughout his career Shapoor served Afghanistan cricket with honour, courage and distinction. His contributions and achievements will always be an important part of the history of Afghanistan cricket and his efforts in service of the national team will never be forgotten.” Zadran represented Afghanistan in 80 international matches between 2009 and 2020.
For two decades, football has been debating which of them is better. Goals, the Ballon d’Or, trophy counting, big game moments – the debate has raged on every possible metric. But the real difference between Lionel Messi and Cristiano Ronaldo is not found on any stat sheet. It is found in the teams that surround them.
This difference is first visible in how each man is treated in his dressing room, long before it becomes visible in any tactics or formation.
Watch Argentina’s victory and celebration Barely seems to care about the outcome. After defeating Egypt to reach the World Cup quarter-finals, the team, without any prompting, lifted Messi on their shoulders and sang his name. This happens after milestones, after trophies, and after general wins. Every camera seems to be watching Rodrigo De Paul find his pitch.
That is not faith. This is something close to belonging. Argentina no longer regards Messi as a superstar who plays for them. He’s simply their leader, and the team behaves that way every time the final whistle blows.
Argentina players celebrate with Lionel Messi in their round of 16 win over Egypt (Reuters Photo)
The atmosphere around Portugal is rarely the same. This does not mean that Ronaldo is unpopular; Teammates past and present Have talked about standards again and again It sets every day. But conversations about the national team rarely stay on football for long. This leads to team selection, whether Ronaldo should still start, whether the next generation has already moved on from him.
No one asks this question about Messi. No one would be surprised should Argentina quietly move on to someone else. Whether that noise reflected the actual dressing room is impossible to know, but it has shaped the atmosphere around Portugal in a way that Argentina have largely escaped.
old mistake
That emotional difference didn’t appear overnight and it started on the field.
Argentina spent years making the mistake that has been the fate of every Messi-led team: handing him the ball and expecting talent to do the rest. They reached the finals and lost. They built attacks around one person’s talents and quietly expected him to fix whatever was broken elsewhere.
The result was a national team that looked less like a machine and more like a magic trick – brilliant when it worked and hollow when it didn’t. Something had to change, and it wasn’t going to be Messi.
arrangement on the savior
Lionel Scaloni and Lionel Messi (Reuters Photo)
that change Arrived under Lionel ScaloniAnd it wasn’t Messi’s play that transformed. No player in his mid-thirties suddenly discovers new gear. What changed was the machinery around it.
As Jonathan Wilson wrote for The Guardian after Argentina’s World Cup victory as his assistant coach: “The idea that Argentina won because of Messi is absurd. They won because they had a functioning team that included Messi.”
That was Scaloni’s greatest achievement. He stopped asking Messi to do everything and built a team that enhanced his strengths rather than relying on them. Rodrigo De Paul covered the ground that Messi no longer needed. Enzo Fernandez controlled the midfield, allowing Messi to move into dangerous pockets rather than chase possession. Alexis McAllister added lines, while Julian Alvarez’s relentless pressing gave Messi the freedom to conserve his energy for moments that decide matches.
One team, no crutches
None of this happened by accident. Each role complemented Messi without completely revolving around him.
The result is a team that doesn’t collapse even when Messi is quiet for twenty minutes because it was never built to rely on him touching the ball on every attack. It defends without waiting for him to track back. It can also create chances through established patterns before allowing Messi to provide the final touch rather than writing the entire script. Argentina no longer plays for Messi. They play with him.
Portugal’s identity crisis
Portugal struggled throughout FIFA World Cup 2026 campaign (Reuters photo)
Portugal’s story has unfolded very differently, and not because of a lack of talent. If anything, this may be the most talented generation of players the country has ever assembled: Bruno Fernandes, Bernardo Silva, Vitinha, Rafael Leao, Joao Neves and Nuno Mendes. On paper, it’s an embarrassment of riches.
But Portugal never resolved a fundamental identity question: was it still Ronaldo’s team, the way it had been for more than a decade, or had it become a new team in which Ronaldo was the finishing touch rather than the focal point?
Attacks still often gravitated towards him, even though the natural rhythm of the squad was that of a generation built on consistent pace, pressing and fluidity. Two good ideas, never quite matching into one.
That uncertainty became a defining characteristic of Portugal. Instead of evolving with Ronaldo as Argentina did with Messi, they often appear torn between preserving the past and embracing the future.
And now, it’s too late.
with 2026 will almost certainly be Cristiano Ronaldo’s last World CupPortugal’s greatest player walked away from football’s biggest stage without fully answering the question for his country that had defined the end of his international career. How can you maximize the greatest player in your history while allowing your greatest generation to be themselves?
Perhaps this is Portugal’s biggest regret. There was never any dearth of talent. There was never any dearth of ambition. The thing was that they could never figure out how to bring Ronaldo and this extraordinary generation together.
real gift
At the age of 39, Lionel Messi continues to perform well for Argentina (Reuters Photo)
This is exactly the clarity Argentina found and Portugal never found.
Scaloni didn’t try to recreate the Messi of 2014. He built around the Messi who stood before him, accepted his limitations, played up his strengths and made Argentina stronger as a collective.
That philosophy extended beyond strategy. Argentina embraced Messi as their leader, celebrating him without hesitation and building a culture that reflected complete confidence in their captain. Whether it was teammates lifting him in the air after the win over Egypt or chanting his name long after the final whistle, there was never any doubt who they were playing with – or who they were playing for.
Portugal’s relationship with Ronaldo has always felt more complicated. The endless debate over whether he should start, whether the team should move, and the persistent social media factions for and against him have often taken a toll on football itself. Whether any of this reflects the dressing room is impossible to know. But the contrast in what the two teams project to the outside world is striking. Argentina seems united behind Messi. Portugal have often looked as if they were still trying to define their relationship with Ronaldo.
In the end, the greatest gift Argentina gave Messi was not the World Cup.
This was a team that finally understood him.
For all of Portugal’s extraordinary talent, this was one thing they never really got with Cristiano Ronaldo. And now, with his final World Cup behind him, it is a question that will remain one of the enduring ‘what ifs’ of his international career.
Former Indian wicketkeeper-batsman Dinesh Karthik Questions were raised on the Gautam Gambhir-led team management after fast bowler Harshit Rana was promoted earlier. Shivam Dubey During India’s disastrous batting performance in the third T20I against England at Trent Bridge. India’s target of 202 runs was quickly resolved after Axar Patel was out on the last ball of the fifth over, leaving the visitors at 52/5. Instead of sending Dubey, the team management opted to promote Harshit Rana, which was a move Karthik Left stunned during commentary. Karthik said on air, “Are you serious? Harshit Rana is ahead of Shivam Dubey? You can’t be serious.” Dubey eventually came to the crease after two overs but failed to save the innings, getting out after scoring only two runs in four balls. passion tongue. Karthik admitted that he did not understand the decision to delay Dubey’s arrival, suggesting that it has raised questions about the team’s trust in the all-rounder. He said, “Do they (team management) not trust Dubey enough to send him at this level? Instead, they have promoted Harshit Rana ahead of him. I am not sure this is the right way to do it.” The selection decision came during one of India’s worst ever batting performances in this format. Phil Salt smashed a blistering 70 off 44 balls as England collapsed to 201/7, while Sam Curran scored 41 off just 24 balls on the challenging surface at Trent Bridge. Despite Vaibhav Suryavanshi hitting two early sixes in his innings of 13 runs in five balls, India’s reply never gathered momentum. The visitors collapsed from 23/0 to 76 in just 11.4 overs, with Josh Tongue contributing 4/28 and Jofra Archer 3/29. The 125-run defeat was India’s biggest defeat by runs in T20 Internationals, surpassing its previous biggest defeat of 80 runs against New Zealand in 2019. This is also India’s second-lowest all-out score in the format. The defeat gave England a 2–0 lead in the five-match series after the opening match was washed out due to rain. India have now lost their last four T20 matches after a 2-0 series defeat in Ireland. captain Shreyas Iyer He described the performance as “atrocious” after the match and admitted that his team “completely needed to go back to the drawing board.” England captain Harry Brook praised his team’s all-round performance, saying, “We did well with the bat. It was wonderful to take him to the bowling.” To avoid losing the T20 series, India will now have to win the remaining two matches.
Egypt head coach Hossam Hassan accused FIFA of letting Lionel Messi and Argentina remain at the World Cup after his team’s dramatic 3-2 defeat in the round of 16 on Tuesday, claiming the defending champions had “supported at every level” during their remarkable comeback.
Egypt looked set to pull off one of the biggest upsets in World Cup history after taking a 2-0 lead and maintaining control until the closing stages. But Argentina staged a spectacular comeback, with Cristian Romero, Messi and Enzo Fernandez scoring three goals in 13 minutes. Win 3-2 and secure a place in the quarter-finals.
“We looked better than the defending champions, were better in everything, but the result was influenced by internal factors on the pitch and external factors off it,” Hasan told reporters after the match.
“Maybe they wanted to keep the world champion in the competition. Maybe they wanted Messi to stay in the race. In football, sometimes there are external factors that go beyond the technical aspects. The world champion had support at every level.”
War decisions spark anger in Egypt
Egypt’s frustration was centered on a series of controversial moments, with the biggest flashpoint coming in the 59th minute when Mustafa Zico’s goal was ruled out by VAR, a decision Hassan believes changed the course of the match.
The spectators were also angry at the absence of a penalty after Mohamed Salah was fouled inside the box. He further argued that Alexis McAllister committed a foul in the build-up to Enzo Fernandez’s stoppage-time winner without any VAR intervention.
“It seems that there is pressure from Argentina on this result. We were objecting to the selection of the referee because of the French position.” [Argentina beat France in the 2022 World Cup final]But everyone has to suffer sometimes, and we suffered,” Hassan said.
“We haven’t seen respect or fair play. A penalty was disallowed, it wasn’t even checked by VAR, and our second goal, remarkably, for whatever reason, was disallowed. We’ve all seen shirts pulled back and not even VAR checked.”
“Life is unfair, normal life is unfair, so why isn’t there fairness in sports?”
“I want to put it in beautiful words and say tough luck, but we’ve been treated unfairly, and that’s an injustice.”
‘I will never watch the World Cup again’
Hassan later doubled down on his criticism in an interview with beIN Sports, revealing what he told the referee after the final whistle and saying that the events had left him disillusioned with the tournament.
Hassan said, “I told the referee that what was happening was not fair. It is an undeserved victory for Argentina.”
Full-time interview with Egypt coach Hossam Hassan:
“Regardless of the result I will say what is in my mind, it was clearly a rigged match and the whole world saw it”
“And I want to say one more thing, if they want Argentina to win so badly, why call everyone – Danis (@DanisMCFC) 7 July 2026
“Once I return to my country and home, I will never watch the World Cup again, because there is no justice in this competition.”
The Egypt coach had already been booked during the match after displaying a FIFA anti-racism sign in protest of a refereeing decision, reflecting growing frustration on the touchline during Argentina’s comeback.
Hassan’s comments are expected to be investigated by FIFA, with the governing body also likely to review his comments after the match. The allegations have already sparked widespread debate and disciplinary action against the Egypt coach cannot be ruled out.
India’s Sanju Samson with head coach Gautam Gambhir (PTI photo)
India’s head coach Gautam Gambhir The growing debate has addressed sanju samsonHis absence from the T20 squad emphasizes that the wicketkeeper-batsman remains in the team’s plans despite being ruled out during the ongoing series against England. Samson’s omission has become the biggest talking point after India’s record 125-run defeat against England in the third T20I at Trent Bridge on Tuesday. The wicketkeeper-batsman, who was India’s Player of the Tournament during their successful T20 World Cup title defence, was dropped for the second T20I, did not play in the third match and has also been dropped from the squad for the Zimbabwe tour. After India’s defeat, Gambhir revealed that he had already spoken to Samson about his role in the team, while also making it clear that these discussions would remain private. Gambhir said, “The first thing is that the clarity that Sanju Samson needed has been given to him from my side. This is completely a conversation between the player and the head coach. This conversation is not going to come out.” The Indian coach insisted that Samson’s contribution has not been ignored, but said that current form will continue to influence selection decisions. “Regarding Sanju, we are very clear that what he has done for India is phenomenal and sometimes you just have to look at the form of a certain player. There is no hard and fast rule that he cannot make a comeback in this series.” Gambhir also defended India’s selection policy, saying that every player should keep earning his place in the national team. “International cricket is about results, so whatever we feel is the best combination to give a result, we play with that combination and that playing XI. I have always been a big believer that everyone has to earn their place and right to play for India.” India’s defeat at Trent Bridge was its biggest ever defeat in terms of runs in a T20 International. Chasing 202, the visitors were all out for just 76 runs in 11.4 overs after young opener Vaibhav Suryavanshi was out for 13 runs. After the opening match was washed out due to rain, England won by 125 runs and took a 2–0 lead in the five-match series. The result also extended India’s struggles in the format, with the reigning T20 world champions now having lost their last four T20Is following a 2-0 series defeat in Ireland. captain Shreyas Iyer Described the batting performance as “atrocious” and admitted that the team needed to “completely go back to the drawing board” after the heavy defeat.
India head coach Gautam Gambhir insists Sanju Samson remains in contention despite his surprise omission from the playing XI after England beat India by 125 runs in the third T20 to take a 2-0 lead in the five-match series.
This is India’s biggest defeat in terms of runs in T-20, due to which the investigation has intensified. team selection call. Chasing 202, India were bowled out for just 76 runs in 11.4 overs as Jofra Archer and Josh Tongue tore apart the batting line-up. losses also increased Shreyas Iyer’s failure to win in five matches as T20I captainIndia are still searching for answers after a disappointing performance which included four defeats and one match being washed out due to rain.
The biggest talking point has been the absence of Samson. The wicketkeeper-batsman was India’s Player of the Tournament during their successful T20 World Cup title defence, producing several match-winning performances. Yet, despite those exploits, he found himself on the sidelines during India’s difficult transition under Gambhir and Iyer.
Speaking after the defeat, Gambhir dismissed suggestions that Samson had been left out of the team’s plans, revealing that he had already spoken to the batsman about his role.
Gambhir said, “The first thing is that the clarity that Sanju Samson needed has been given to him from my side. This is completely a conversation between the player and the head coach. This conversation is not going to come out.”
The Indian coach reiterated that Samson’s contribution has not been forgotten, but also said that current form will continue to impact selection.
“Regarding Sanju, we are very clear that what he has done for India is phenomenal and sometimes you just have to look at the form of a certain player. There is no hard and fast rule that he cannot make a comeback in this series.”
Gambhir also defended the team’s selection philosophy, saying that every player should keep earning his place.
“International cricket is about results, so whatever we feel is the best combination to give results, we play with that combination and the final XI. I have always been a big believer that everyone needs to earn their place and right to play for India.”
Adaptability under the spotlight
With India struggling throughout the tour, Gambhir admitted that the team had failed to adapt to the conditions, a concern that was reflected in the results against both Ireland and England.
“In terms of adaptability, obviously we haven’t adapted well. That’s the reality, whether it’s Ireland or England. If we had adapted well or played better cricket, maybe we wouldn’t have lost four games in a row.”
The crushing defeat in Bristol has further increased the debate over India’s team composition. While Gambhir has made it clear that Samson’s international career is far from over, India’s continued struggles mean that every selection call will remain under the microscope until results start improving.
Shreyas IyerHis luck has been shining at the time of the toss, while the wait continues for his first win as India’s full-time T20I captain. The 31-year-old won his fifth consecutive toss in T20Is after electing to field against England in the third T20I at Trent Bridge on Tuesday. By doing so, Iyer joined the elite list of Indian captains to win five consecutive toss in the shortest format.ms dhoni The record of winning seven consecutive toss between May 2010 and February 2012 still stands Virat Kohli Won six in a row during 2019. Rohit won five consecutive tosses between February 2020 and February 2022, which Iyer has now equaled.Most consecutive tosses won by an Indian captain in T20Is
MS Dhoni – 7 (May 2010-February 2012)
Virat Kohli – 6 (August 2019-December 2019)
Rohit Sharma – 5 (February 2020-February 2022)
MS Dhoni – 5 (September 2007)
Shreyas Iyer – 5 (June 2026-July 2026)*
However, the streak of winning the toss has done little to change India’s fortunes on the field.Since taking over as India’s full-time T20I captain after the 2026 T20 World Cup, Iyer is yet to register his first win. India faced consecutive defeats against Ireland before the opening T20 match against England was washed out due to rain. They then lost the second T20I in Manchester, making Iyer winless in his first four matches as captain before the Trent Bridge clash.
Playing XI for India vs England 3rd T20 match
England (Playing XI): Philip Salt, Jos Buttler(w), Harry Brook(c), Jacob Bethel, Tom Banton, Sam Curran, Will Jacks, Liam Dawson, Jofra Archer, Adil Rashid, Josh TongueIndia (Playing XI): Abhishek Sharma, Vaibhav Suryavanshi, Ishan Kishan (w), Shreyas Iyer (c), Shivam Dubey, Tilak Verma, Axar Patel, Harshit Rana, Prince Yadav, Arshdeep Singh, Varun Chakraborty.Fast bowler Prince Yadav has been included in the team in place of leg spinner Ravi Bishnoi, who had a poor performance in the last match.
