pete davidson And Elsie Hewitt’s relationship has been in the news recently. While there were rumors of the two’s separation, several other reports confirmed that the two were trying to work things out. However, according to the latest news, just 5 months after welcoming their child into the world, the two have officially called it quits. Here’s everything we know about the case.

peat davidson And elsie Hewitt parted ways by mutual consent

According to a new report from PEOPLE, Pete Davidson and Elsie Hewitt have officially split after dating for almost a year. The two also welcomed their child in December last year. Reportedly, the two could not work together on the problems they were facing in their relationship and have decided to part ways with mutual consent. Not only that, but they also aim to become “friends” in the future when things are better for them.“They aren’t getting along at the moment. They were already struggling a bit while Elsie was pregnant. Things happened so fast between them and they didn’t know each other very well,” the report said.However, for the sake of their child, they are attempting to work things out and are choosing to focus primarily on co-parenting. “She’s (Elsie Hewitt) not fighting Pete over seeing the baby, but it’s not easy. Ultimately, they would like to be friends and work together, but it’s hard to think about getting to that place right now.”

About Pete Davidson and Elsie Hewitt

For those unaware, the pair were first linked together when news of their dating surfaced in March last year. They were seen together in public on several occasions and were seen going on dates. Last December, they announced that Hewitt had given birth to their daughter, Scottie Rose. She was named after Davidson’s late father, Scott Matthew Davidson.Since announcing the news to the world, they’ve both been eager to share glimpses of their everyday life as new parents online. From selfies to rare glimpses of their newborn daughter, the duo proudly shared moments from their lives online. In March, the duo had celebrated their daughter’s 12-week completion and had also posted about the same. Hewitt wrote that on the way to the hospital, the two of them tried to guess what time their child would be born.

What happened between Benny Johnson and Marjorie Taylor Greene? YouTuber faces serious charges during Thomas Massey controversy (Image via Getty)

Benny Johnson and Marjorie Taylor Greene are now in the middle of a heated public battle online, and it all started because of fresh claims involving Congressman Thomas Massie. On May 14, debate erupted on X when Green shared a post criticizing YouTube’s coverage of allegations made against Macy by Johnson’s alleged ex-girlfriend, Cynthia West. The claims came just days before Massey’s primary election in Kentucky, which quickly turned into a political and social media storm.The situation escalated when Green accused social media influencers of being “paid to spread propaganda.” Benny Johnson hit back soon after, saying that he was simply covering a major trending story for his audience. From here both sides started making sharp allegations against each other by making long public posts. While Johnson defended his reporting, Green accused him of spreading lies and using other people’s material. Meanwhile, Thomas Massey also publicly denied all the allegations against him and described them as politically motivated ahead of the elections.

The online confrontation began when an X user named BobbySauce criticized Benny Johnson’s latest YouTube video about Thomas Massey. In the video, Johnson discussed allegations from Cynthia West, who reportedly claimed that Macy gave her hush money during their previous relationship. Marjorie Taylor Greene reposted that criticism on May 14 and wrote about influencers getting “paid to spread propaganda.” That post immediately caught Johnson’s attention.Johnson responded directly to Green, writing: “I cover trending news topics on my show. The Macy’s allegations and your South American mansion were the number one trending topic on this platform. I am entitled to my opinion on these matters. I serve my audience. This is my job. And unlike you, I won’t walk away from my job when things get tough.”Shortly thereafter, Green responded in even more strongly worded terms. He called Johnson “a lying scoundrel” and accused him of spreading “common lies” for money. He also noted previous media allegations involving Johnson, including claims related to Russia, Israel, Orthodox conferences and content theft. Green questioned why he never discussed those allegations on his platform.Johnson later responded with another lengthy statement. He said Green’s comments were “evidence-free slander” and defended his reporting. She also criticized Greene on immigration and border issues, saying: “What you said about me is evidence-free slander. But what I said about you is true.” At the same time, Thomas Macy publicly denied all allegations made against him by Cynthia West. Messi said in his statement:“It is sad that a week before this election people are making false and baseless allegations about me in a clear attempt to influence the outcome of this election. All claims of inappropriate conduct are false. I have never offered anyone money in exchange for their silence.”He also said: “No ethics claims have been filed against me, nor have any claims ever been filed against me in my 14 years in office. I have consulted with legal counsel, and we are considering all options.” As of now, Marjorie Taylor Greene has not publicly responded to Benny Johnson’s latest post.

Is note celebration becoming old in IPL? Dale Steyn certainly thinks so, and he expressed his sentiments after Akash Singh took out a piece of paper with a message during the LSG vs CSK game at the Ekana Stadium on May 15.

LSG vs CSK, IPL 2026: Highlights | Achievement:

Akash played his first match of the season And shook the CSK top order by taking the wickets of Ruturaj Gaikwad, Sanju Samson and Urvil Patel. Right after Ruturaj’s wicket, he took out a note which read,

“#AktionFire – Akash knows how to take wickets in a T20 game.”

This trend started last year when Abhishek Sharma penned a message for SRH fans and it has continued this season too, first Raghu Sharma did the same and then Urvil Patel showed a message dedicated to his father.

But by the time Sky removed it, Stan said it was time to put the papers away. The South African legend said in a tweet that the note celebration is no longer in trend and was never in fashion.

Stan said on

Why did Akash pull the note celebration?

During the match, commentators asked Justin Langer about Akash’s celebration and he said that he was not aware of it and it was something that he would have to look into.

But, Akash revealed this after the end of the first innings, saying that there was no reason behind it and the chit was meant to serve as a motivation for him.

Akash said, “It just motivates me. There is no reason behind it. I will keep supporting whoever motivates me during the game.”

It will be interesting to see whether the players will now follow Steyn’s advice and look for new celebrations during matches.

ipl 2026 | ipl schedule | ipl points table | ipl player stats | purple cap | orange cap | ipl video | cricket news | live score

– ends

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi warned that Americans would soon face the economic consequences of an escalating US–Iran conflict, arguing that rising loan costs, mortgage rates and consumer financial stress were the “real pain” of what he described as a “war of choice” against Iran.In a post shared onHe shared a market snapshot showing a sharp rise in US Treasury bond yields. For context, Treasury yield is the return investors earn for lending money to the U.S. government by purchasing Treasury securities such as bonds, notes or bills.The benchmark 10-year US Treasury yield climbed to 4.555%, while the 30-year yield rose above 5% to 5.096%, according to market data. The 2-year Treasury yield, which closely tracks expectations around Federal Reserve policy, also rose to 4.065%.Rising Treasury yields generally signal that investors expect higher inflation and tighter financial conditions. Analysts say fears of disruption to Middle Eastern oil supplies, particularly around the Strait of Hormuz, have raised concerns that energy prices could rise sharply if tensions escalate further.Higher oil prices can affect the broader economy by increasing fuel, transportation, and manufacturing costs, ultimately leading to higher consumer prices. Higher Treasury yields also translate into higher borrowing costs for mortgages, auto loans and business loans across the United States.Araghchi’s comments also highlight growing pressure on US consumers, particularly in the auto sector, where loan defaults have already reached their highest levels in decades amid high interest rates and persistent inflation.The Iranian foreign minister’s warning comes as tensions between Washington and Tehran continue to weigh on global markets, and investors weigh the economic risks of prolonged conflict in the Middle East.

Taiwan’s Ministry of National Defense (MND) said on Saturday it had detected eight Chinese naval vessels and one official ship around the island, a day after US President Donald Trump concluded his high-profile visit to China amid discussions on Taiwan, trade and the Iran war.In a statement posted on Twitter, Taiwan’s MND said, “As of 6am today (UTC+8), 8 PLAN ships and 1 official ship were detected operating around #Taiwan. #ROCArmedForces have monitored the situation and responded.”The ministry said no Chinese military aircraft were detected in the vicinity of Taiwan during this period. A day earlier, Taiwan reported the presence of seven Chinese naval vessels and one official ship near its territorial waters.

Trump-Xi talks put Taiwan in the spotlight again

The latest military activity came shortly after Trump returned from Beijing following meetings with Chinese President Xi Jinping, where Taiwan remained one of the most sensitive issues on the agenda.Trump described the summit as a meeting between “two great nations” and said he believed China was unlikely to take aggressive action against Taiwan while he was in office.“I don’t think they’ll do anything when I’m here. When I’m not here. Honestly, I think they might do it,” Trump told Fox News after the summit.Trump also said that China does not want Taiwan to declare formal independence. “This is not a takeover. They just don’t want to see this place — we’ll call it a place because no one knows how to define it — but they don’t want to see it become independent,” he said.According to news agency AP, Xi privately warned Trump during the conversation that differences over Taiwan could potentially bring the US and China into confrontation or conflict.

Question on America’s support to Taiwan

Trump’s comments also raised new questions over Washington’s long-term policy toward Taiwan. The US President described Taiwan as “a bit of a difficult problem” because of China’s geographical and military advantage.“When you look at the barriers, China is a very, very powerful, big country. It’s a very small island. Think about it; it’s 59 miles away. We’re 9,500 miles away,” Trump told Fox News.Trump also confirmed that he had not yet decided whether to proceed with a previously approved US arms package for Taiwan after hearing Xi’s objections during the visit.The proposed arms sale is under review.

Tension continues between China and Taiwan

China claims Taiwan as part of its territory and has repeatedly vowed to bring the self-ruled island under its control, including using force if necessary.However, Taiwan functions independently with its own government, military, and economy.The issue remains one of the biggest friction points in US-China relations.Beijing has increased military pressure around Taiwan in recent years through frequent naval and air force deployments near the island.

Imagine you’re heading inside a shop for some quick shopping and are surprised to see a deer in Marks & Spencer: a wild muntjac trapped on an escalator, staring out at the chaos of modern shopping.Hard to imagine, we know – but it happened anyway!This happened in England. The little deer wandered into the shopping center, seemed lost, and got stuck on the moving stairs. Emergency responders and animal rescue teams attended, along with a crowd of stunned customers. Despite all the commotion (and what may have been the worst retail adventure of the deer’s life), rescuers managed to safely free the animal.No doubt a great day with social media. People joked that the deer was just looking for Percy Pigs, or perhaps keeping an eye on food deals. And behind that laugh, however, is a real worrying trend: As cities expand and green habitats shrink, wildlife is moving into human spaces.

What actually happened?

According to eyewitnesses, it happened during store hours, and the deer simply wandered off, climbed the escalator (a move that even humans sometimes regret), and got trapped, Sky News reports. As soon as people came to know that there was a live deer inside, panic spread.Store employees stopped the escalator and called rescue teams. Photos online show responders carefully covering the animal with blankets and working to tranquilize it, using specialized equipment to prevent injury. Some people said that the deer was completely exhausted and startled by the noise.Eventually, rescue teams were successful: the deer was taken out and examined by veterinarians, who later said there were only minor injuries.

What is muntjac?

Now, many people outside the UK are probably wondering what is a muntjac? For those unaware, muntjacs are small Asian deer, originally from China and Southeast Asia. Introduced to Britain in the 20th century, they escaped from estates and now roam much of England and parts of Wales. Think medium-sized dog, with short legs, a rounded back and unique markings on the face. When frightened, muntjacs bark loudly, literally like dogs.Muntjacs are quite well adapted to woodlands, parks, gardens and suburbs. Therefore they have started appearing on roads, residences and even near shops. Encounters between humans and muntjacs are becoming more common.But escalator incidents? No, they are rare.

phrases and real concerns

Animal welfare groups explain how urban spaces can be dangerous for deer. They become disoriented by noisy streets, mirrors, and crowds and may hurt themselves trying to escape. That’s why rescue teams focus on calming the animal and keeping the public away from crowds.This time the teams performed brilliantly.And sure enough, online, the story sparked a wave of puns. “Extremely unfortunate,” “Stuck between the floor and the creatures,” “Wanted to see what M&S ​​Food is about,” “Some light retail therapy” – people couldn’t resist.However, beyond all this humor, experts say such incidents highlight a larger issue. As cities grow and green spaces shrink, animals are changing their daily routines. Foxes roam London, wild boars appear in suburbs across Europe, coyotes appear in North American cities, and monkeys raid Asian markets. And now, apparently, the deer try the escalator.Ecologists think we will continue to see wildlife adapt. Some are calling for better urban planning and protected greenways, so animals are not stranded in malls.However, for those shopping at M&S ​​that day will remain etched in their memories for reasons that have nothing to do with biology. After all, most people go to the supermarket expecting long lines or overpriced sandwiches, not a deer stuck on an escalator!

Candace Owens has questioned claims that Charlie Kirk chose wife Erica Kirk as his successor at Turning Point USA before his murder. Owens cast doubt on the authenticity of an audio recording allegedly captured during a private Aspen donor retreat and demanded the release of the full video footage. TPUSA has refused, citing donor privacy concerns, leading to further debate and controversy online.

The future of Turning Point USA has become the center of a fresh political storm, months after the founder’s death. charlie kirk. New reports surrounding a private donor retreat in Aspen are now fueling online debate, questions of leadership and tension involving conservative commentator Candace Owens.At the center of the controversy is an alleged conversation from 2025 in which Kirk allegedly revealed who he would want to lead Turning Point USA if something ever happened to him. The resurfaced claims have sparked strong reaction online as the recording has never been publicly released.

Charlie Kirk reportedly named wife Erica as TPUSA successor before his death

According to reports reviewed by the Daily Mail, Kirk responded to a question about succession planning during a private donor retreat in Aspen, Colorado, just months before his murder in September 2025.Kirk reportedly responded, “What a great question,” before outlining his vision for the future leadership of the organization.During the meeting he reportedly said, “If anything happens to me I’m appointing my wife to run Turning Point USA. Erica will do a great job.”The comments attracted major attention after Charlie Kirk’s death came just days after TPUSA’s board voted unanimously to appoint Erica Kirk as CEO.Several donors reportedly told the Daily Mail that they remembered the conversation clearly. One board member claimed that the leadership transition plan was already widely understood internally.“The board already knew what the plan was because they had talked about it with Charlie, everyone knew,” the source reportedly told.The revived claims have intensified discussion about the future direction of TPUSA, especially as the organization navigates one of the most emotional chapters in its history.

Candace Owens questions Charlie Kirk audio as TPUSA refuses to release it

While some conservatives readily accepted the succession story, Candace Owens openly challenged the authenticity of the recording played during AmericaFest.“The more I listen to it, the more it sounds like AI,” Owens said on his podcast.Owens later increased pressure on TPUSA by demanding the organization publicly release the full Aspen Retreat footage.Owens wrote on X, “Why wouldn’t they release the video? Sure, if they captured the audio they have the video.”“The claim is that at an Aspen retreat a few weeks before his death, Charlie responded to a donor who asked ‘what would happen if you died’ to which he replied that he wanted Erica to take over. I would like to see the video of that.”Owens later said: “Absolutely. It would certainly help a lot to dispel the narrative that Erica wanted her position for herself. Releasing the footage seems like an easy PR win.”However, TPUSA has refused to release the video publicly. Representatives of the organization reportedly argued that donor privacy policies prevent them from sharing recordings from private investor gatherings.As the political and online controversy continues, unresolved questions surrounding the recording are further exacerbating the already emotional debate.

New Delhi: Five months after putting on hold its decision accepting the controversial 100-metre-height definition for the Aravalli hills, Supreme Court Said on Friday that not even an inch of the Aravalis will be allowed to be used for mining until an expert committee constituted by the apex court redefines the Aravali hills and ranges.After lawyers appearing for mining lease holders and those seeking to obtain mining leases said the process of renewal and grant of leases could be carried forward without finalizing them, a bench of CJI Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi said, “We will not pass any order to allow resumption of mining activities in Aravali.”The CJI said, “We will not allow even an inch of Aravali to be used for any purpose unless we are satisfied with the new definition that will be proposed by the expert committee to be constituted by us, which will take into account the names suggested by the amicus curiae, the Supreme Court, the Central government and the parties.”CJI Kant, who hails from Haryana and is aware of the detrimental impact of decades of illegal mining on the environment and ecology of the Aravalis, considered the green lungs of north-western India, said, “The entire problem has arisen because of the powerful mining lobby. We are very clear in our minds that no activity will be allowed without getting the report and satisfying us about the protective umbrella that will be put in place.”On December 29 last year, a bench led by CJI Kant had taken suo motu cognizance of the deep concern expressed by environmentalists over the November 20 judgment of the Supreme Court accepting the definition of 100 meter height for the Aravalli hills. It had ordered a halt to all mining activities and renewal or new mining leases in the Aravalli region.Keeping the implementation of the Supreme Court’s November 20 judgment indefinitely stayed, the bench had said in its order, “This stay will remain in effect until the present proceedings reach a logical final stage, ensuring that no irreversible administrative or ecological action will be taken on the basis of the existing framework.”The CJI-led bench had proposed to constitute a committee of domain experts for a “thorough, holistic and scientific” examination for a comprehensive definition to protect the “structural and ecological” integrity of the Aravalli hills and ranges.Amicus curiae and senior advocate Parameshwara informed the court that in consultation with the government, a list of domain experts has been submitted to the court. The bench said it will list the matter for constituting a committee soon after hearing the parties.