“Bizarre attacks against me”: Candace Owens accuses Ben Shapiro of suing her, while Laura Loomer responds with harsh criticism
Candace Owens and Laura Loomer are now in a public fight that is getting more serious by the day. On May 4, 2026, the two posted lengthy messages on X, making strong claims about each other. Owens said that Ben Shapiro is secretly behind the legal action and online attacks against him and his family. At the same time, Loomer fired back, saying that Owens was avoiding important questions and not denying his reports. The situation quickly pulled in other names such as anna kasparian and groups like Turning Point USA. What started as an online debate has now turned into lawsuits, claims of personal data and individual targeting.Owens claimed this has been going on for years and said his family is being targeted financially. However, Loomer said that Owens is trying to play the victim and not answer the real issue. Both sides are now making serious claims without clear evidence shared publicly, making the situation more stressful and confusing for followers.
Candace Owens Accuses Ben Shapiro of Lawsuits and Attacks, While Laura Loomer Hits Back
Candace Owens shared a long post saying that Ben Shapiro is working behind the scenes to harm her. “Each and every one of these bizarre attacks against me and my family last week were being perpetrated behind the scenes by @benshapiro,” he wrote. She also claimed that the legal action against her was being taken through people associated with her, including a lawyer associated with her family.He said the situation was related to problems inside The Daily Wire, including layoffs, although he did not provide evidence. Owens said Shapiro has been trying to “bankrupt” her family and has been “legally harassing” her for years. He concluded his post by saying that his family will not break under pressure and wrote, “You will never break what God has joined together.”Laura Loomer immediately replied and challenged Owens directly. He said, “You’re not denying any of my reporting?” Loomer claimed that Owens told his followers to call his reports fake but did not actually deny the details. He also criticized Owens for bringing religion into the debate, writing, “Happy people don’t have to announce to the world that they are happy.”Loomer added, “For the record, he has not denied any of my reporting. Why should I care that he is a Christian?” It was clear from his tone that he believed he had the upper hand in this argument.Other people also joined the discussion. A user named Jody Chase posted a summary saying that Owens confirmed Shapiro’s role in the attacks and linked it to issues inside The Daily Wire. Another reply by John Mappin noted tensions associated with Turning Point USA and suggested deep disagreements between leaders.The situation became more serious when Owens later accused Loomer of sharing private information about her car and family. Owens said that some of the information shared online was false, but he confirmed that some details, such as his vehicle, were revealed correctly. He claimed that Loomer may have obtained this information through illegal means, which would have involved someone having access to car records.Owens wrote that if this claim is true, it could constitute a serious crime involving access to personal data. He also suggested that similar methods may have been used to obtain details about Anna Kasparian’s family.Meanwhile, Loomer made separate claims about Ana Kasparian, saying she spread misinformation and refused to correct it. Loomer said legal action could be taken and accused Kasparian of working with Owens.For now, all of these claims are coming directly from posts on X by those involved. No official legal documents or verified reports have been shared publicly to support many of these statements. This makes it difficult to confirm what is true and what is not.The feud is still ongoing, and more reactions may be coming as both sides continue to post online. What is clear is that this is no longer just a simple online disagreement, it now involves lawsuits, serious claims of private data and a long-term conflict between well-known public figures.