director Nitesh Tiwari Fans are counting down the days to the release of his epic’Ramayana‘, starring Ranbir Kapoor And Yash is in the lead role. As the first part of the film franchise is set to release on Diwali 2026, the director highlighted the portrayal of its main rival, Ravana. Nitesh Tiwari on Yash’s RavanaWhile promoting the film in Los Angeles, director Tiwari, in a conversation with Collider, said that his main antagonist, played by Yash, will be presented with more depth and complexity rather than a one-dimensional villain. When asked if Ravana would be portrayed as a traditional villain, he shared, “There were many aspects to his life. He was a great warrior, a skilled musician, a scholar, a philanthropic king, a great Shiva devotee. So there was more to him than just being a black character.”Nitesh Tiwari on the search for RavanaThe filmmaker emphasized that highlighting these details of his life serves a deeper purpose in the film’s story. He further explained, “Why it’s important for us to showcase all these parts and aspects of his life, because there’s a very important lesson hidden in them. You can have all these great qualities, but if you’re ruled by vengeance and if you’re driven by ego, you know what the end results are going to be. So there’s a great lesson that’s hidden there.”Release date of ‘Ramayana’Ramayan, which stars Ranbir in the role of Lord Ram and Sai Pallavi as Sita, is being projected as a large-scale retelling of the ancient epic, blending visuals with emotions. The six-hour long film will reportedly be divided into two parts, with Part 1 releasing on Diwali 2026 and Part 2 releasing on Diwali 2027.

IITian Baba, Abhay Singh, who shot to fame at Mahakumbh 2025 for his blend of distinguished education and penance, has quietly married Pratika, an engineer from Mangaluru. The couple, who met about a year ago, got married on Mahashivratri and are now planning to start ‘Shree University’ to integrate spiritual practices and knowledge.

Abhay Singh, or IITian Baba, was one of the most sought-after names in the world of spiritual seekers and viral sensations ahead of Mahakumbh 2025. His unique story, combining elite education with tenacity, went viral online, making him an online sensation for his choice in life after being educated at IIT Bombay.And once again, he is in the headlines again, not for his unusual theories and beliefs about the universe, but because he quietly got married on Mahashivratri and the pictures with his wife went viral.

Mahakumbh 2025 fame ‘IITian Baba’ Abhay Singh gets married, meets wife Pratika (Photo: X/@shivanshp007)

Who is IITian Baba’s wife? Copy of?

Pratika, an engineer from Mangaluru, Karnataka, shares Abhay’s tech roots. They reportedly connected at Sadhguru’s Adiyogi Ashram in Coimbatore about a year ago, possibly after the Mahakumbh, based on shared life values ​​and outlook. In a media statement quoted by ABP News Live, Abhay said he lives a “very simple, minimalist life” in Dharamshala, Himachal Pradesh.The couple got married at the Aghanjar Mahadev Temple on Mahashivratri on February 15, 2026, followed by a court marriage on February 19. On 6 March, he went to Jhajjar to meet his parents and handle bank business, where a crowd gathered who were astonished to see ‘Baba’s’ bride. The viral clip showed him signing documents and spending time in his father’s chamber, where Abhay was dressed in saffron robes.Pratika remains calm and praises Abhay as “simple, honest and sincere” in social media reports.

Who is ‘IITian Baba’ – Abhay Singh?

Abhay is a resident of Sasroli village of Jhajjar, Haryana. He cracked JEE Mains in 2008 with an All India rank of 731, earning a place at IIT Bombay for Aerospace Engineering from 2008–2012, followed by a master’s degree in design. ​​After stints in New Delhi and Canada, where he reportedly earned about Rs 3 lakh monthly or 36 LPA in an aerospace firm, he returned to India, taking up spirituality. The winter in Shimla, Mussoorie and Dharamshala influenced changes in his plans about life.He rose to fame at the 2025 Mahakumbh, where he was interviewed in ascetic garb, sparking a debate on science versus soul.His father, lawyer Karan Grewal and former president of the Jhajjar Bar Association, shared in an NDTV interview: “Our family wants Abhay to return home. But after achieving so much, it is not easy for him to come back. After this he decided to become a monk.He was always interested in spirituality. I was in touch with him till six months ago. After that, he blocked me and all communication with me. I heard that he was in Haridwar and I wanted to meet him but could not go and now it has gone viral in the media.Abhay’s YouTube channel on spirituality attracted early supporters, including his future wife.

What are the future plans of this couple?

Abhay told NDTV India that they are working on “Shri University” to unify spiritual practices, reconnect people with knowledge and promote Sanatan Dharma under one roof.

Filmmaker Priyadarshan addressed claims of plagiarism for his upcoming film ‘Bhoot Bangla’. He clarified that the use of a phrase from Satyajit Ray’s ‘Gopi Gine Bagha Byne’ was just a common word, ‘ghost’, and not a melodious imitation. Priyadarshan stressed his deep respect for Ray and explained that the lyrical choice was relevant to the title and theme of the film. Read further to know in detail.

film producer Priyadarshan Abhinit is all set for the release of his upcoming film ‘Bhoot Bangla’ Akshay Kumar. At the film’s trailer launch event on Monday, the director reacted to the reported use of an expression from the song ‘Bhooter Raja Dilo Bor’ in his upcoming horror drama.

Priyadarshan’s reaction allegations of plagiarism

The song ‘Ram Ji Bhala Karein’ from ‘Bhoot Bangla’ contains the hook line of the song ‘Bhooter Raja Dilo Bor’ from the National Award winning Bengali film ‘Gopi Gain Bagha Byne’. Satyajit Ray. Responding to the allegations of plagiarism, Priyadarshan said, “I respect him (Satyajit Ray) a lot, he is one of the gurus from whom I learned cinema. Second, the word you are saying is a ghost. Now, if I ask you, how many songs are the word ‘Deewana’ used in Indian cinema? That means only the first person, who used the word ‘Deewana’, has the right to use it.” It’s just a word. We can’t use, if someone uses two lines, everyone can use, but the tune has nothing to do with the song.“As reported by IANS, the filmmaker further shared, “The lyricist has written those lines, and that’s why we were so confident that there is nothing wrong in it, and there is a reference to it because the film is ‘Bhoot Bangla’, and you should also understand that there is a previous film called ‘Bhoot Bangla’. Naturally, that title has been repeated now. So these things are repeated; there is nothing wrong in it. I respect Satyajit Ray like the God of Indian cinema. I do.“

More information about ‘Bhoot Bangla’

Directed by Priyadarshan, the film stars Akshay Kumar, Paresh Rawal, Tabu, Rajpal YadavJishu Sengupta, Asrani, Mithila Palkar, and Rajesh Sharma.This film will be released in theaters on 16 April 2026.

Even after several months of deliberations, the resignation did not come. It came quickly, almost suddenly, and despite what most would consider a dream proposal. His salary is twice as big as his previous salary. A role that promised growth. A company that, on paper, seemed progressive. And within a few days nothing felt right. It wasn’t workload. These were not people. These were not even expectations. This was something much more subtle and much more disturbing. Cameras.Not the usual security cameras placed on corners or entry points. These were different. These were designed to observe, measure and explain human behavior at a microscopic level. They monitored eye movements. They monitored blinking patterns. They quietly collected data on how attentive employees were at any given time. And that was enough for him. She left.When observation turns into monitoringThe story, shared by a career coach @Simon_Ingariquickly gained popularity online—not because people were surprised that someone quit, but because of why he did so. This raises many uncomfortable questions. Employers today have access to increasingly sophisticated technology. Tools that measure keystrokes, track screen time, analyze communication patterns, and now—even study biological signals like blinking. The rationale is often simple: better data leads to better performance management. But this incident reveals another aspect. When every movement is monitored, work stops feeling like work. It starts to feel like a test you didn’t agree to take. Experts argue that such systems don’t just monitor productivity – they reshape behavior. Employees begin to act not naturally, but strategically. They make a show of “being productive” rather than actually focusing on meaningful output.A decision that sparked debateWhat makes this matter more shocking is the response of the leadership. The company’s CEO reportedly did not see any problem in the system. If seen from the management perspective, it makes sense. In-depth analysis of employee behavior can play a role in increasing productivity. And needless to say, this will lead to better accountability.But not everyone liked that approach. Critics say the issue isn’t related to cameras — which are already in most offices anyway. But it’s about intention. If a company feels the need to measure how many times a person blinks, what does that say about how it views its employees? As the discussion spread, many professionals began to question whether such practices were the future of work – or a step too far. false illusion of dream jobOutwardly the employee’s decision may seem quite illogical, but in fact it says a lot about his attitude towards the company and its employees. But this story highlights a deeper truth: Compensation alone doesn’t define a good job.A role may provide financial rewards and yet fail to provide psychological security. In fact, high-paying jobs can sometimes hide deeper issues. The promise of money can delay difficult questions:Do I feel respected here?Am I confident in doing my job?Can I work without constant monitoring?In this case, the answers became clear very quickly. And when they did, the salary didn’t matter. psychology of seeingThis is why surveillance in the workplace leads to strong reactions. Humans behave differently when they know they are being monitored. This isn’t just anecdotal – it’s backed by decades of psychological research.Constant monitoring can lead to the following results:

Instead of promoting productivity, it often creates pressure to appear busy rather than actually be effective. In extreme cases, it can even drive people away—which is exactly what happened here. The irony is hard to ignore: A system designed to improve performance cost the company a valuable rent.trust vs controlEssentially, this story is not about the camera. It’s about philosophy. Some organizations work on trust. He believes that if employees are given autonomy and clarity they will deliver results. Others work on control. He believes that performance must be continuously measured to ensure performance. Technology has made the second approach easier than ever. But easier doesn’t always mean better.Career experts argue that excessive monitoring can be counterproductive. Many jobs that require creativity, knowledge-based roles, problem-solving abilities and deep thinking cannot be measured or controlled by ‘tools’. You can measure time. You can measure activity. But measuring thinking – the kind that leads to real breakthroughs – is far more complicated.Widespread changes in workplace expectationsThis incident is not alone. This reflects a broader change in the way people think about work. Today’s professionals—especially young ones—are increasingly prioritizing:

Salary still matters, but it is no longer the only factor. In fact, stories like this show that people are willing to give up good job opportunities if the work environment is not in line with their values. The old adage that “money is everything” is slowly losing its power. This situation is a good example of a common mistake that modern businesses make: over-optimization. Companies sometimes use tools without thinking about how they will affect people in the pursuit of efficiency. What starts out as a harmless metric, like tracking attention, can turn into something much more intrusive. And when that happens, workers don’t feel as if they’re being monitored. They feel diminished—just data points, patterns, and metrics. The change may be small, but its impact is big. Because once people feel like they’re not supposed to be working people, they’ll likely stop caring about their job.Why he decided to leave and it’s a lesson for everyone The employee in this story had to make a decision that was based on one question: What kind of place do I want to work? She could have stayed there. She could change. She could bear the pain and focus on money. But he did not do so. Instead, she decided to put something less concrete, but arguably more important, at the top of her list: her sense of independence and dignity. And that choice is what influenced so many people. This story teaches us one thing: technology alone cannot make a great place to work. Tools can help you get more done, but they can’t replace trust. If companies rely too heavily on surveillance, they risk making their workplaces feel more like prisons than places where employees can live on their own. And it becomes difficult to keep people in these types of places.After all, skilled workers have choices. And this case shows that they are willing to walk away from even high-paying jobs if those jobs offer something that money can’t buy.more important questionsAs technology in the workplace continues to improve, things like this will likely happen more often. This makes me think about an important question: just because you can measure something doesn’t mean you should. At this time, there is no single answer. But for one employee, the answer was clear enough to leave a good job and start working elsewhere. And in doing so, he may have exposed a truth that many people are just beginning to see: A job that pays well just to watch you blink can be very expensive.