A viral clip of American commentator Tucker Carlson caused controversy when he suggested that societies governed by Sharia law are “more advanced” than those in the West.The comment was made during one of his episodes of The Tucker Carlson Show.In the volume, Carlson says: “There is not a single Western city that is prosperous… They are all in moral and physical decline due to self-loathing and a lost will to live.”He further draws the comparison: “Sharia law has made Islamic societies more advanced than those in the West.”Carlson then compared it to his experiences in the Middle East. “I travel a lot in the Middle East. It’s amazing. They’re Muslim. A country governed by Sharia law. And you go there and it’s incredible to be in a place that is proud of itself, that believes in its religion and culture, that thinks ‘We’re doing something.’ It is this kind of confidence that creates stability and hospitality.”The comments sparked backlash, particularly from right-wing and MAGA voices. Laura Loomer accused Carlson of “romanticizing” jihadist societies and claimed that his comments support her long-standing allegation that he effectively “converted to Islam” or became a foreign-influenced “Cutlerson” figure.Social media users also said Carlson’s comments were meant to praise systems that oppress Christians and Jews while attacking Western values.However, Carlson’s supporters and the team rejected those claims. He pointed to the full transcript of the episode, saying none of the quotes were fabricated and that Carlson had not called for the US to adopt Sharia law. Instead, they described his remarks as an observation about why some Gulf countries such as Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates appear stable and confident compared to Western capitals.He also emphasized that Carlson has repeatedly described himself as a “fervent Christian” with no intention of proselytizing.The dispute comes amid an ongoing rift in conservative circles over foreign policy, particularly US involvement in the Middle East, support for Israel and the war on Iran.Carlson also visited Qatar a few months ago for the Doha Forum, where he interviewed the country’s Prime Minister. During the program, he announced plans to buy a house in Doha and said that he liked the city and that he was working as an “independent person” choosing where to live.

File photo: Mossad chief David Barnia

A recent report claims that Mossad chief David Barnia reportedly told Israel’s cabinet before war with Iran that regime change in Tehran is possible, but it is likely to take about a year, not just days or weeks.According to The Jerusalem Post, Barnia presented several scenarios to Israeli leaders on the eve of war, some of which suggested a few months, but a one-year time frame was considered the most likely estimate.This more cautious assessment has been obscured by recent anonymous attacks, the report said, accusing them of exaggerating the prospects for a rapid collapse of the Iranian regime.

Qualified Assessment, No Guaranteed Prediction

The main point emerging from the report is that Barnea’s position was more meritorious than some later portrayals. According to The Jerusalem Post, he did not present regime change as inevitable, but rather as a possibility dependent on a number of conditions and likely to take a significant amount of time. The report said Barnia was known to attach caveats to major intelligence assessments and that any pitches he made to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu or US officials would have been strictly controlled and framed as part of a broader government strategy.However, this contradicts earlier reports which claimed that the Mossad expected a rapid coup.According to the New York Times report, Barnia told Netanyahu and senior Trump administration officials in mid-January that within days of the war starting, the Mossad could potentially help unify the Iranian opposition, leading to riots and acts of insurrection that could even lead to the fall of the government. However, the report also noted that no such rebellion had occurred three weeks into the war, and American-Israeli intelligence assessments concluded that the Iranian regime had been weakened but still intact.The Times of Israel, citing Channel 12, similarly reported that Barnia had assessed that overthrowing the Iranian regime would be possible if key military objectives were achieved first, including beheading the leadership, damaging regime institutions and weakening its ability to suppress civilians. But stressed that he also offered “disclaimers and qualifications”, noting that the situation was unstable and it could take a long time to achieve such results.Publicly, both Netanyahu and US President Donald Trump initially indicated that military action could create the conditions for regime change, but both also said that the Iranian people themselves would have to take action. Since then, the message has become more restrained. US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard said on Thursday that the US intelligence community assesses that the Iranian regime remains intact but largely degraded.Netanyahu has also stopped short of predicting imminent collapse. He said Israel was working to “create the conditions” for the regime’s collapse, but added, “It may survive, maybe not. If it survives, it will be very weak.”

Candace Owens responded to a viral clip about Erica Kirk, and used it to reinforce her ongoing criticism. He argued that these comments broadly reflected public opinion, leading to intense debate online. The clip, which drew mixed reactions, added fuel to the ongoing investigation from Owens’ documentary, where she questions Kirk’s background and public narrative, keeping the controversy active.

A short podcast clip has turned into a full-blown online talking point, drawing Candace Owens, Joe Rogan and Erica Kirk into a messy, fast-paced debate. What started as a casual exchange on a popular show didn’t stay casual for long. Within hours, the clip went viral on social media, garnering reactions, criticisms and curiosities.Candace Owens stepped up almost immediately. Instead of distancing herself from the moment, she leaned into it. His response added fuel to an already growing conversation, turning a viral clip into something that now feels more personal and candid.

Candace Owens sparks debate after viral comments about Erica Kirk resurface

After reposting the clip, Owens clarified his stance. “Oh no! It takes yet another commenter to point out the obvious fact that Erica’s behavior, conduct, and history is bizarre. Have you ever wondered how Joe Rogan stays on top? Because his conversations reflect how everyday people feel about a variety of topics,” he wrote, framing the situation as a reflection of public opinion rather than a controversy.The original clip comes from the March 21 episode of The Joe Rogan Experience. During the discussion, Rogan made a comment that immediately gained attention online: “I heard there’s an Erica Kirk commercial. I heard that.” This comment, blunt and unexpected, became the spark that pushed the clip into viral territory.As the conversation progressed, things got even stranger. Rogan referenced the unusual online video and said, “Maybe it was in some weird CIA documents or even CIA movies… Have you ever seen those movies? … See if you get those movies. There are some weird internal movies that they made that she was a part of,” leaving many listeners unsure whether to take the claims seriously.What makes this moment more profound is that it does not stand alone. Owens has already been openly critical of Erica Kirk in her recent documentary, where she questions parts of Kirk’s personal story and public image. This latest response seems like a continuation of that effort rather than a one-off response.This situation shows how quickly things can get out of control online. One video, a few comments, and suddenly, the conversation is much bigger than before.

Study shows humans lived at Sharjah’s Buhais rockshelter between 125,000 and 16,000 years ago/Image: WAM

For years, a site believed to have been largely uninhabited between 60,000 and 12,000 years ago has been re-evaluated, as new research has revealed evidence of repeated human occupation at the Buhais Rockshelter, an archaeological site in Sharjah, United Arab Emirates. These findings challenge long-held assumptions about human settlement in southeastern Arabia and paint a clearer picture of how early populations adapted to the changing environment. The study, published Monday, March 23 nature communicationIt was led by Isa Yousef, Director General of Sharjah Archeology Authority (SAA), and Dr. Saba Jassim, Advisor to the Authority. It was conducted in collaboration with researchers from the Universities of Tübingen and Freiburg in Germany, as well as Dr. Knut Bretzke of the Friedrich Schiller University Jena and Professor Adrian Parker of Oxford Brookes University. Topic Evidence from the Buhais Rockshelter of human habitation in Arabia between 60,000 and 16,000 years agoResearch identifies several phases of human presence at the site, dating back to approximately 125,000, 59,000, 35,000 and 16,000 years ago. Youssef said, “The publication of this study is a major step forward in our understanding of early human history in this region. The evidence from Buhais demonstrates that southeastern Arabia was not simply a passage for early humans, but a landscape where they returned, adapted, and maintained life under changing environmental conditions.”

Overview of Buhais Rockshelter/Image: Nature Communications

These findings are based on extensive archaeological excavations at the Buhais Rockshelter, located within Sharjah’s Faya Palaeolandscape, a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 2025. The results add an important new chapter to the early settlement history of the Arabian Peninsula and extend the well-established Jebel Faya archaeological sequence into a previously unspecified time frame.

Overview of excavations at Buhais Rockshelter/Image: Nature Communications

For decades, it was widely believed that southeastern Arabia was largely uninhabited between 60,000 and 12,000 years ago due to extreme aridity during the last ice age. The new study directly challenges that notion. Rather than a prolonged absence of human activity, the evidence points to repeated occupation during different periods, suggesting that early humans were able to survive and bounce back despite harsh climatic conditions. Rather than representing a single phase of habitation, research confirms multiple phases of recurring human activity at the site. While evidence of human presence was already known from about 125,000 years ago, the identification of three additional phases from about 59,000, 35,000 and 16,000 years ago fills important gaps in the archaeological record of the region. These findings provide a more continuous timeline of human presence in southeastern Arabia than previously thought. This study also builds on additional paleoenvironmental research conducted within the Faya paleolandscape. This data shows that periods of human occupation coincide with phases of increased rainfall and water availability. These environmental improvements would have supported vegetation and created conditions suitable for human life, providing an obvious explanation for the repeated return of populations to the site. This is the first clear evidence linking human settlement to specific environmental conditions during this time frame in Arabia. The findings show that early populations were not only passing through the region as part of migration routes, but were also able to adapt to the changing climate and sustain life over long periods of time. The Buhais Rockshelter itself played an important role in preserving this record. Its limestone formations provided natural shelter, allowing layers of sediment to form over thousands of years. These layers, reaching a depth of about 1.7 metres, preserve stone tools and artefacts in a stratigraphic sequence, providing valuable insights into human activity in different periods. Using luminescence dating techniques, the researchers were able to determine when these sediment layers were last exposed to sunlight. This method enabled them to reconstruct a detailed timeline of both human presence and environmental change, providing a rare and well-preserved record of life in the arid landscape over thousands of years. Southeastern Arabia has long been considered a major corridor for early human movement out of Africa and into Asia. The new findings provide empirical evidence that the region was not only a passage route but also a place of repeated settlement during several stages of human evolution. This places the region at the center of ongoing scientific discussions on global human migration and the formation of early populations in Southwest Asia. Combined with nearby discoveries at Jebel Faya, which document human activity in the area dating back more than 200,000 years, the study reinforces the wider importance of the Faya paleolandscape. The site is now recognized as one of the most important and continuous records of early human occupation in an arid environment. The research also reflects decades of work led by the Sharjah Archeology Authority in collaboration with international institutions. This long-term partnership has combined scientific expertise with a shared commitment to the preservation and interpretation of early human history. The growing collection of evidence from sites such as Buhais and Jebel Faya continues to highlight the UAE and Sharjah’s contribution to the global narrative of human development, adaptation and migration.

It is said that the morning routine that people follow often reveals a lot about them, even more than what they show to the world. The same is true when it comes to the world’s most powerful leaders, such as the presidents of the United States. Despite their busy lives and responsibilities, the routines followed by American presidents range from the disciplined to the bizarre.

Although some presidents had formal routines, others had routines that reflected their personal characteristics or their opinions on health. Historical records from official sources like the White House Historical Association and the National Archives show us the lesser-known sides of American presidents.

It is important to look beyond the official responsibilities of presidents to understand the unusual routines they follow in the morning, which show us the real side of these powerful people. PC: AI-generated

Jordan Stephens (Image via Getty)

Jordan Stephens has shared his candid opinion after a viral clip showed Piers Morgan in a heated exchange with TikToker Harrison Sullivan, also known as HSTikkyTokky. The moment came following the release of Louis Theroux’s The Manosphere documentary on Netflix, in which Sullivan appeared. Soon after, Pierce invited him for an interview, but the conversation soon became tense and spread widely online.In a six-minute Instagram video, Jordan Stephens said the interview served no purpose. He felt that the discussion lacked depth and direction. According to him, the situation became exactly what Sullivan is known for, drawing reactions and attention. Jordan said Pierce should have expected this and handled it better from the beginning.

Jordan Stephens questions Piers Morgan’s interview approach with Harrison Sullivan

Jordan Stephens did not hold back in explaining his point. He said, “I was astounded by the mediocrity of Piers Morgan’s attitude towards this man. Even interviewing HS is pointless to him.” He believed the interview was more about attracting attention than getting anything meaningful across.He told that Harrison Sullivan had come prepared to provoke a reaction. “HS clearly came prepared to make him angry and Pierce completely fell for it,” Jordan said. He said that someone with Piers Morgan’s experience should have handled the situation more carefully.Jordan also told that the questions asked were not correct. Rather than trying to challenge Sullivan with moral arguments, he felt the interview should have explored his thinking. “There were more interesting questions to ask him,” he said. She suggested asking about beliefs, upbringing, and personal experiences to better understand their thoughts.He also noted that Sullivan is not a father, so his comments about rejecting a child cannot come from real life experience. Jordan said more research could have been done instead of just focusing on the arguments.Another issue Jordan raised was how people like Sullivan attract attention. He said that they grow because people react strongly to them. He explained, “Trying to bring someone on stage who is known for anger-promoting and then being anger-aggressive is completely wild and he should have been prepared.”Jordan also talked about a bigger issue. He said an important point missed in the documentary was how online platforms deliver such content to young audiences. According to him, the real concern lies here, because many young viewers are exposed to these ideas without even searching. He concluded by saying that people like Sullivan thrive on attention, but over time, such ideas may fade as people question them more.

After video of a woman crying while being arrested by two ICE officers went viral, DHS clarified who was arrested at the San Francisco airport and why.

After Donald Trump ordered the deployment of ICE to airports to help deal with long queues, hundreds of TSA employees walked off the job over non-payment, sparking fears that these immigration agents will now violently arrest people at airports. A video of a woman traveling with her child crying at the San Francisco airport as ICE agents arrested her has gone viral. The agents were not wearing any masks and when other passengers asked the agents to show their badges, they did not comply and continued to force themselves on the woman. “I don’t know who you are,” a man in the background of the video asked the agents to show them proof they were from ICE. The woman said, “Maybe someone is kidnapping him.” But the agents did not respond. Some social media users claimed that the woman was a US citizen traveling with her young daughter but she could not prove her citizenship to the agents’ satisfaction and was violently taken into ICE custody. But the incident occurred on Sunday, before ICE agents were deployed to manage the TSA crisis on Monday. Airport officials also said it was nothing to do with the new ICE deployment, that it was an immigration arrest. Airport spokesman Doug Yackel said the violent arrests were unrelated to Trump’s directive.“We understand that federal officers were escorting two individuals on an outbound flight when this incident occurred,” he wrote in an email to The New Republic. “We believe this is an isolated incident and there is no reason to suspect the SFO will take wider enforcement action… We were not involved in or informed about this incident in advance. Airport operations continued without disruption and there was no impact on flights or passenger processing.“Utah state senator Nate Blouin wrote on Twitter, “I flew to San Francisco last night at 10 and due to a ‘security’ issue we were stuck on the tarmac for 30 minutes. Can’t imagine it was anything other than that.” Silly.”

DHS says there was order to remove illegal aliens

DHS also confirmed that the incident occurred before the deployment of ICE over the TSA crisis and that no US citizens were arrested. “This arrest of illegal aliens occurred yesterday, March 22, 2026 – before ICE officers were deployed to airports to boost TSA efforts. ICE officers arrested Angelina Lopez-Jimenez and Wendy Godinez-Lopez at San Francisco International Airport. These illegal aliens had a final order of removal from an immigration judge since 2019. While being transported to the international terminal for processing, Lopez-Jimenez attempted to flee and resisted law enforcement officers. ICE is working as quickly as possible to return the family unit to their home country of Guatemala, DHS said in a statement.