Din the Great (via Getty)

A doctor has spoken out after a shocking incident involving Misfits boxing champion Deen The Great went viral online. The doctor reportedly suffered serious facial injuries in the fight. Images and videos shared on social media showed swelling and damage.The injured man later posted a video. He explained about his condition and the pain he is going through. He claimed that the punch came unexpectedly and he did not get a chance to defend himself. The incident has raised concerns about security and accountability, especially when trained fighters are involved in public disputes. Many users are now debating whether legal action Should be taken.

Doctor describes injuries and claims surprise attack

The therapist detailed his injuries in a video shared online. He said the damage to his face was real and serious. He said he is currently suffering from a broken nose, facial fractures and a broken tooth. He also revealed that he needed stitches and was still in pain while speaking. According to him, one of his eyes is almost completely closed and he is having difficulty seeing clearly. Even basic activities like trying to open the eyes are difficult and painful, he said.He further said that he was not behaving aggressively during the encounter. He said he was sober and even told the boxer that he worked as a therapist. He claimed that the punch came suddenly, without warning, and startled him. Because of this, he did not react or counter-attack. He emphasized that it would have been dangerous to face a trained boxer in such a situation, and believed that the outcome could have been much worse.The doctor also addressed online criticism. Some people raised questions as to why he did not defend himself. In response, he told that he was not ready. He said he did not expect violence. He stressed that the boxer’s professional training has made the punch extremely powerful. He also hinted at the possibility of taking legal action but acknowledged that financial limitations might make it difficult.Meanwhile, Crip Mac also talked about his experience with Deen in a separate interview. He acknowledged that he had been ostracized during their exchange. He praised Deen’s punching ability and said that once he landed a hit, he immediately felt the impact and knew he was going down. He acknowledged that trained boxers are highly skilled and dangerous in close combat situations.

Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmail Baqai

Just two days before the ceasefire deadline expired, Iran hardened its stance on talks with the United States, saying that keeping the door open to talks does not mean negotiating at any cost.“The announcement came at a time when US President Donald Trump said on Sunday that a US delegation would travel to Islamabad on Monday for fresh talks with Iran, state media Tasnim news agency reported. “We are offering a very fair and reasonable deal, and I hope they will accept it, because if they don’t, the United States will destroy every single power plant and every single bridge in Iran. Mr. Good Man will be no more!” He added.Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmail Baqai said on Monday that “Tehran currently has no plans for the next round of talks.” Despite this, Iran has not completely refused diplomacy. Ebrahim Azizi, head of the Iranian parliament’s national security committee, said in an interview with Al Jazeera, as quoted by ANI, that engagement with Washington would depend entirely on national priorities. He said that “Iran acts based on national interests” and is ready to do whatever is necessary to “safeguard the country’s interests and security.”Azizi stressed that continued dialogue is not without limits, saying, “It does not mean negotiating at any cost”. He stressed that Iran has defined red lines that “must be followed” and that sending a delegation to Islamabad would depend on receiving a “constructive response” and “positive signals” from the United States.Describing Tehran’s approach, Azizi said diplomacy is closely linked to its military stance. “We see the current talks as a continuation of the battlefield and we see nothing more than a battlefield in this,” he said. He said the talks would only be meaningful “if it delivers achievements that maintain the battlefield”, warning that this would not be the case “if the Americans intend to turn it into an area of ​​extreme demands based on their bullying approach.”“He also pointed to key conditions for any progress, noting that “the issue of Lebanon has been very important to us” and that “the release of frozen assets” remains a priority. Azizi warned that any move “contrary to the interests of the resistance front” would signal Iran’s rejection of the conditions and would have consequences.US-Iran ceasefire talks held in Islamabad on 11 April ended without any agreement. discussion, mediation by PakistanIt lasted for about 21 hours but failed to achieve success. The standoff centered on disagreements over the Strait of Hormuz and Iran’s nuclear program.Iranian state outlets said the US naval blockade of Iranian ports remains a central problem, with Tehran arguing it amounts to collective punishment.

New Delhi: A blow to actor-turned-politician Vijay, who is leading TVK’s political debut in the Tamil Nadu elections. Madras High Court On Monday, a petition seeking an income tax probe into his asset declarations was accepted.While hearing the case, the court found irregularities of more than Rs 100 crore in the oral affidavit and issued a notice in the case.“This is an irregularity. More than Rs 100 crore has not been disclosed,” the court orally remarked, according to Live Law.A division bench of Chief Justice SA Dharmadhikari and Justice G Arul Murugan issued notice to Vijay along with the Director General of Income Tax (Investigation). Election Commission of India (ECI), and Returning Officer for Perambur and Tiruchirappalli (East) constituencies.The petitioner has alleged that the disappearance of high value assets is a clear case of suppression of property, which raises serious concerns with regard to beneficial ownership, routing of funds and concealment of material details. It is further argued that such discrepancy between the declarations cannot be attributed to clerical error or guesswork. According to the petition, the only reasonable conclusion is that either one of the affidavits is false or the related corporate filings are false, requiring a thorough investigation in either scenario.If such irregularities are ultimately established, the consequences could be serious. Any proven concealment or false declaration in the election affidavit may invite criminal proceedings under applicable laws, potentially leading to fine or imprisonment, and may result in disqualification from contesting elections under the Representation of the People Act, 1951. Additionally, discrepancies involving undeclared assets can trigger action by income tax authorities, including fines and possible prosecution for tax violations.

समाजवादी पार्टी के वरिष्ठ नेता आजम खान और उनके बेटे अब्दुल्ला आजम खान को दो पैन कार्ड मामले में बड़ा झटका लगा है. सेशन कोर्ट ने उनकी अपील खारिज कर दी है. इससे पहले निचली अदालत ने दोनों को दोषी पाया था और सजा सुनाई थी. इस फैसले के बाद उनकी कानूनी मुश्किलें और बढ़ गई हैं. कोर्ट का यह फैसला राज्य की राजनीति में भी अहम माना जा रहा है.

निचली अदालत की सज़ा बरकरार है
जानकारी के मुताबिक निचली अदालत ने इस मामले में आजम खान और उनके बेटे को दोषी करार देते हुए 7-7 साल की सजा सुनाई थी. साथ ही दोनों पर 50-50 हजार रुपये का जुर्माना भी लगाया गया. इस फैसले को चुनौती देते हुए दोनों ने सेशन कोर्ट में अपील दायर की थी, लेकिन अब कोर्ट ने उनकी याचिका खारिज कर दी है.

दो पैन कार्ड मामलों में दोषी ठहराया गया
यह मामला दो पैन कार्ड बनाने से जुड़ा है, जिसमें आरोप लगाया गया था कि नियमों का उल्लंघन कर अलग-अलग दस्तावेजों के आधार पर पैन कार्ड बनाए गए. इसी आधार पर कोर्ट ने दोनों को दोषी पाया था. इस मामले की सुनवाई के बाद कोर्ट ने सख्त फैसला सुनाया.

अपील खारिज होने से बढ़ी मुश्किलें
सेशन कोर्ट से अपील खारिज होने के बाद दोनों की सजा बरकरार रहेगी. इससे उनके सामने कानूनी चुनौतियां और बढ़ गई हैं. हालाँकि, आगे की कानूनी प्रक्रिया के तहत उच्च न्यायालय जाने का विकल्प अभी भी खुला है।

राजनीतिक असर भी संभव
इस फैसले का राजनीतिक असर भी देखने को मिल सकता है. आजम खान की गिनती उत्तर प्रदेश की राजनीति के बड़े नेताओं में होती है. ऐसे में उनके और उनके बेटे के खिलाफ यह फैसला भविष्य में राजनीतिक समीकरणों पर असर डाल सकता है. फिलहाल इस मामले को लेकर राजनीतिक गलियारों में चर्चा तेज हो गई है.

Cuttack: The Orissa High Court has expressed serious concern over the condition of a British-era building in Mission Road, Cuttack, which currently houses St. Xavier’s School since January this year.A division bench of Justices KR Mohapatra and V. Narasimha took up the issue after examining a report submitted by the Cuttack district administration on April 16 following earlier directions to inspect the safety conditions of all schools in the city.“The report reveals a shocking situation,” the bench said. Considering that till now 48 schools have been inspected. This especially marked the position of St. Xavier School at Mission Road, Buxi Bazaar said the institution was functioning in an “almost dilapidated building” without a structural stability report.The court recorded the assurance of Additional District Magistrate Kamaljeet Dash that necessary steps would be taken to ensure the safety of students, teaching and non-teaching staff. “If necessary, alternative arrangements will be made in consultation with the school management,” the ADM assured. Taking note of this, the bench directed the authorities to submit the action taken report by May 4. The next hearing of the case will be on May 7.The building, a 143-year-old structure and an example of Indo-European architecture, has been a subject of concern for a long time. Built as a residence by Civil Surgeon Dr. WD Stewart in 1883, the building was later donated to the Baptist Mission in 1887 for educational purposes and became Christ Collegiate School in 1950.Official records show that as early as 20 February 2016, the Public Works Department warned that the structure was in a dangerously dilapidated condition and could collapse at any time. The school was later shifted to a nearby facility in 2019.Despite this, the building was reopened after reported repairs and St. Xavier’s School started functioning there from January 23, 2026.The issue of conservation versus security has also been in focus. In 2019, a PIL filed by lawyer Shivshankar Mohanty sought to declare the structure a heritage building under the Orissa Municipal Corporation Act, citing its architectural and historical importance. The High Court had then directed the civic body to take action on the petition.

Private school students are not included in the UK Royal Academy scheme, which provides funded training to five state-educated musicians/Image: Getty Images

The UK-based Royal Academy of Music has sparked debate after introducing a scheme that limits access to state-educated students, raising concerns that some less affluent private school pupils are being left out, according to The Times (UK).The Academy, established in 1822, is offering a fully funded foundation year for musicians aged 18 to 20. The course is aimed at those who are seen as under-represented, particularly students who have missed out on music training due to the long-term decline in provision in state schools.Only five students will be selected each year, with the program starting in July. Those selected will receive personal tuition, academic guidance, group training and assistance with university applications.The eligibility rule has been questioned by school leaders, who say background cannot be assessed solely by what type of school a student attends. Philip Britton said, “There are a lot of less affluent people in independent schools and a lot of privileged people in government schools.” He pointed out that some schools, including Bolton School, provide full fee support to families earning less than £20,000.Richard Jones, head of Bryanston School in Dorset, described the approach as “naïve” and said it risked reinforcing perceptions about private education. He said many independent schools have students on scholarships and said applications must be assessed individually.The academy has defended its position. Its principal, Jonathan Freeman-Attwood, said the focus is on students who “desperately need and deserve” support, particularly those who do not have adequate access to training but show strong potential.Funding for the first three years comes from the Clore Duffield Foundation. Its president, Vivian Duffield, said the program aims to give talented young musicians the time, training and guidance they need to move forward.The academy said students from independent schools are already more likely to have access to structured music education. It also highlighted its extensive work, supporting over 500 young people each year and providing £5.8 million of financial support to students last year.