Gandhinagar: BJP Union Home Minister said Bengal government will not press charges against Bangladeshis living illegally in the state, if they decide to return voluntarily Amit Shah It said on Thursday the Centre’s commitment to detect, detain and deport illegal immigrants from the country.“Today, newspapers are saying that illegal immigrants are returning voluntarily. The Bengal government has created detention centres. But we all want those who have entered illegally to go back voluntarily. If they do, the state government will not register any case against them. Instead, it will help them return,” Shah said, accusing the previous Mamata Banerjee-led Trinamool Congress government of allowing uncontrolled infiltration into West Bengal.“Hopefully, most of the people will leave before the operation to identify infiltrators begins. Our government is committed to expel every infiltrator from the country,” Shah said during a public event in Sonipur in Gujarat’s Gandhinagar district.Shah said the BJP had promised during its assembly election campaign in West Bengal that if people voted for the party, fencing would be installed on the India-Bangladesh border.Congratulating Bengal CM Suvendu Adhikari, Shah said the new state government has handed over 600 hectares of land to the BSF for border fencing within seven days of assuming charge. He also transferred 121 hectares of land in the strategically important Siliguri Corridor – or ‘chicken neck’ in north Bengal, which connects the north-east to the rest of India – to the central government.Shah said that PM Narendra Modi had constituted a high-powered committee to investigate the reasons behind the “unnatural demographic changes”. The panel will submit its report within a year.“The committee will study the circumstances and suggest solutions, including whether a legal framework is needed to address illegal immigrants,” Shah said.The Home Minister said Modi has extended Gujarat’s development model across India in the last 12 years and claimed that the BJP has ruled almost 80% of the country’s geographical area. He said, “From Gangasagar in Uttarakhand to Gangasagar in Bengal, BJP has influence in the Ganga region.”Shah also paid tribute to Veer Savarkar on his birth anniversary and described him as a patriot whose contribution to India’s freedom struggle did not need any official recognition.

Bengaluru: From being one of Royal Challengers Bangalore’s most reliable finishers to becoming a key figure in the backroom setup of the defending IPL champions, Dinesh Karthik has followed the development of the franchise closely.In a freewheeling interview with TOI, the 40-year-old RCB mentor and batting coach talked about the emergence of the captain, the champion mentality within the team. Rajat Patidar As a calm leader, and coaching international stars. Part:Mentality of the team defending the titleAt the beginning, each player was given a structure explaining what they should do. In terms of results, there were going to be ups and downs, so the main thing was to make sure that the things we were good at we did very well and the things we could have done better. We’re constantly focusing on it and getting better at it and it’s a good way to look at this tournament. It is a long tournament and it is important to stay fresh.Patidar’s evolution as a captainIt was heartening to see him remain the same person: cool, calm and relaxed on and off the field. As a leader, he has handled the pressure well without showing it, which is commendable.He is still the same person he was before becoming captain, which says a lot about him. I have played with him and I have a good relationship. Seeing him succeed as both a batsman and captain makes me feel very proud.coming of age Devdutt PadikkalHe was always an exceptional batsman for Karnataka and across all formats. But in the IPL, I think he wanted to change some areas of his game, which he addressed immediately, and we as a group were quite happy to help and you can see the results on the field, the confidence and the way he is batting. It’s always a good sign when a young guy like him understands what it takes to take his game to the next level and he asks for suggestions and opinions, but he does it in his own way. He is a strong man. I believe he is a fantastic talent and it is great to see that talent become something very special to the team.On the difference between coaching Indian and international playersYou have to adjust to international players in a different way. For example, Tim David is very different from Romario Shepherd, so you need to understand both of them and where they are coming from. They are very independent people, so you have to see what works for them, and sometimes less can be more, and I try to say very little if I don’t need to interact too much. I’ve learned a lot from Andy (Flowers) and Mo (Bobutt) about how they handle different players and their character traits. They are very different from what I have had with Indian players, but full of respect.On being named among the best coaches by Phil SaltPhil has obviously traveled the world and worked with many coaches. It was nice to see him admit that what I said helped him. My role was to understand what Phil was doing and help him raise his game. He was willing to discuss areas for improvement, which empowered me to provide useful feedback. Such open relationships with foreign players are always beneficial. Your interactions with the players on the bench. Being in the top 11 or 12 of the IPL doesn’t define you as a player. It’s all about team combination; If you’re not into it, it doesn’t make you less valuable. Avoid thinking too much about your selection situation.On preparing finishersThe role of finisher is a specific role. It is difficult because you do not have to face as many balls as the top-order batsmen. Therefore, you have to understand what it means to perform well and accept some of the ways you can get the best out of it. It is very important to be a good finisher because in most of the innings you play, you are taking a lot of risk. So you have to be very aware of what success means, being a finisher and how confusing failures can really be sometimes. The challenge is to understand and treat both of them equally. Also, the way you practice and prepare for the game is extremely important.

When North Dakota farmer Randy Filsvold dies unexpectedly in a car accident in September 2025, his family is faced with grief as well as an overwhelming reality. About 1,400 acres of corn and soybeans were still standing unharvested as the winter season approached. For farming families, missing a narrow range of crops can mean devastating financial losses. Randy’s wife, Kharra, and their children were suddenly faced with personal tragedy and the possibility of losing an entire season’s work. However, what happened next became a remarkable example of how rural communities still come together in moments of crisis.

After the death of a farmer, 1,400 acres of land was saved due to the efforts of neighbors

Shortly after Randy’s death, two of his close friends, Wyatt Thompson and Andy Gates, decided that the family would not face the harvest alone. He began contacting neighboring farmers in surrounding North Dakota communities, asking if anyone could donate equipment, trucks, or time to help bring in the harvest.The response was immediate.Within a few days, about 75 farmers arrived with combines, grain carts and trucks ready to work in the fields. What might have taken one family several weeks to complete soon turned into a coordinated community effort.According to local reports, the volunteer operation involved about 12 combines, seven grain carts and more than 40 trucks. Farmers traveled from more than 10 nearby towns, bringing their own fuel, machinery and labor without asking for payment.For two days, the fields were busy almost non-stop as equipment moved in orderly lines between the crops. The operation resembled a professional large-scale harvest, yet everyone involved volunteered to help a grieving family.Some social media posts later described the scene as “42 trucks”, although local coverage generally reported the number to be more than 40.

Why is time so important?

The harvest season in the northern United States is largely weather dependent. Once snow, freezing temperatures or wet ground occurs, crops can quickly deteriorate or become impossible to gather efficiently.For the Filswold family, the stakes were huge. 1,400 acres of land represents not only the crops on a farm, but an entire year’s worth of labor, investment, and income. Losing the crop would have created severe financial pressure in addition to the already devastating personal loss.This urgency is one reason so many farmers understood the need for immediate action.

‘To know Randy is to love Randy’

Friends described Randy Filsvold as a well-respected man in the local farming community. Several volunteers later explained that helping the family was a natural reaction because of the kind of person he was.One friend expressed a sentiment shared throughout the community, saying, “To know Randy was to love Randy.”Kharra Filsvold later described watching the combines and trucks filling the fields as emotional and overwhelming. For her family, the harvest became much more than a farming operation. It became a public show of support during one of the most difficult moments of his life.

A story that resonates far beyond North Dakota

After local television coverage and social media posts circulated online, the story quickly spread across the country. Many people were impressed not only by the scale of the volunteer effort, but also by its representation.In many rural farming communities, neighbors still rely heavily on each other during emergencies, accidents, and natural disasters. While modern farming often relies on advanced machinery and technology, stories like this continue to highlight the strong personal relationships that lie behind the industry.For many readers, the image of dozens of combines and trucks arriving to save a distressed family’s crop is a rare reminder of collective kindness and solidarity in difficult times.

Pune: Political parties in Pune district are lagging behind in appointing booth-level agents (BLAs) for the upcoming special intensive revision (SIR) of voter lists, while the administration needs more than 8,000 personnel for the exercise.Pune District Collector and District Election Officer Jitendra Dudi said times of India Repeated appeals have been made to the parties. “We have asked them to complete the appointments as soon as possible so that the work can proceed smoothly,” Doody said.Deputy election officer Meenal Kalaskar said political parties are required to formally appoint a BLA for each polling station. “We have 8,417 polling stations in Pune district and each party has to appoint equal number of agents. Once the appointments are made, the details have to be submitted to the election office. Only then can these agents assist the Booth Level Officers (BLOs) in special intensive vetting work,” she said.Kalaskar said many parties need to complete the process before the June 20 deadline. “These political agents can assist BLOs during domestic visits as part of the SIR exercise,” he said.The District Administration will conduct SIR campaign to update and clean the voter list across Pune district under the instructions of Election Commission of India. Between June 30 and July 29, physical verification of approximately 91.16 lakh voter records will be done door-to-door.During the exercise, BLOs will verify voter details including name, address, photo and other details. Entries under the category “Absent, Transferred, Dead and Duplicate” will also be scrutinized.Officials said that out of the total 91.15 lakh voters in Pune district, around 51.41 lakh voters have been identified so far.According to the schedule released by the election authorities, printing of counting forms and BLO training will be conducted between June 20 and June 29. The draft voter list will be published on August 5, while claims and objections can be filed till September 4. The final voter list is scheduled to be published on October 7.District administration data shows that political parties have so far appointed only a fraction of the required BLAs.in Pune district BJP has appointed 2,746 BLAs, followed by NCP 984, NCP (SP) 658, Shiv Sena 400 and Congress 204.Shiv Sena (UBT) has appointed 28 BLAs, while MNS has appointed only one. AAP and Samajwadi Party have not appointed any agent yet.Maharashtra There are 1,00,253 polling stations. BJP has named 52,215 BLAs, Shiv Sena 17,800, Congress 17,421, Shiv Sena (UBT) 10,140 and NCP (SP) 4,468.In the state, voter list mapping has reached 72%, with seven crore voters out of 9.86 crore voters mapped.State election officials said BLOs will visit every house from June 30 to July 29 and verify whether the mapping has been completed.A party official said that they will soon start the BLA naming process. “We are already working and we will adhere to the deadline,” he said.

Some quotes remain relevant because human nature rarely changes as much as people think. Societies develop. Technology changes rapidly. Entire industries disappear and new ones emerge. Yet human behavior often repeats the same patterns from generation to generation, especially when responsibility is shared among large groups of people. Perhaps that’s why this quote by Canadian-American psychologist Albert Bandura still sounds surprisingly modern.“Where everyone is responsible, no one is really responsible.”At first glance this sentence seems simple. Almost too simple. Yet the more one thinks about it, the more uncomfortable it becomes because most people have seen such exact situations many times in ordinary life.A problem arises.Everyone notices it.Everyone assumes someone else will handle it.Nothing happens.This pattern is present almost everywhere. Office. School. Governments. Friend group. online community. Even family sometimes. People tend to believe that shared responsibility automatically creates cooperation, although Bandura’s quote suggests that the opposite may also be true. When accountability becomes unclear or spread too widely, action often disappears as individuals cease to feel personally responsible.The result may be disappointing. Sometimes even dangerous.

today’s thought by albert bandura

“Where everyone is responsible, no one is really responsible”

Know the meaning behind Albert Bandura’s quote

At its core, the quote seems to describe how responsibility is diluted when too many people assume that someone else will step up first. Humans often behave differently in groups than they do individually. A person who usually acts quickly when alone may become completely hesitant when surrounded by others.Psychologists sometimes call this “diffusion of responsibility.” The larger the group becomes, the easier it becomes for individuals to mentally distance themselves from the action. People unconsciously assume that someone more competent, more confident, or more authoritative will eventually intervene.This belief often produces surprising paralysis.Imagine a workplace where a serious mistake is visible to everyone. Every employee notices it, although no one addresses it directly because everyone assumes another co-worker has already reported the problem. Eventually, the problem became larger as responsibility became shared rather than clearly defined.Bandura’s quote seems to warn against this kind of collective passivity.This line may seem crazy at first, however it reflects a very real pattern in human behavior.

Albert Bandura spent years studying human behavior

Albert Bandura became one of the most influential psychologists of the twentieth century because his work focused heavily on how people learn to behave socially. He is particularly known for developing social learning theory, which explored how observation, imitation, and environment shape human actions.Bandura believed that people are greatly influenced by what they see around them. Man does not learn only from direct experience. They also learn by observing how other people behave and seeing which behaviors are rewarded or ignored.That idea connects strongly to this quote.When individuals repeatedly observe situations where no one accepts responsibility, that behavior itself becomes normalized. Over time, people become increasingly passive because they unconsciously expect passivity from the group around them.Bandura was deeply interested in these subtle social dynamics as they affect almost every part of life, from education and workplaces to politics and relationships.

Modern workplaces often struggle with this problem

One reason this quote seems especially relevant now is that modern workplaces often operate through large teams, complex structures, and endless collaboration systems. In theory, teamwork sounds ideal. In fact, unclear accountability sometimes creates confusion rather than efficiency.Employees participate in meetings where everyone enthusiastically discusses problems, although no one has direct ownership over solving them. Emails keep getting copied to dozens of people simultaneously until the responsibility is completely reduced. Deadlines pass because everyone silently assumes that someone else is already handling the situation.Many employees probably recognize this immediately.The problem becomes worse inside larger organizations where communication already feels impersonal. When people feel emotionally detached from outcomes, accountability naturally weakens.Bandura’s quote captures that dynamic with uncomfortable accuracy.Sometimes, responsibility requires clarity more than quantity.

Social media created new versions of the same behavior

Interestingly, this quote seems highly relevant even in the age of social media. Now millions of people watch tragedies, controversies or crises simultaneously online. Information spreads instantly. Emotional reactions also spread. Yet actual action is often surprisingly limited.Part of the reason may include what Bandura described.When large numbers of people become aware of the same issue, individuals sometimes assume that collective awareness equals meaningful action. Sharing outrage publicly can create a feeling that the responsibility has already been met.In fact, nothing significant may actually change.That disconnect is often visible online. A topic trends for several days. Everyone discusses it in depth. Then the attention goes elsewhere before a meaningful solution can emerge. Collective visibility sometimes creates the illusion of responsibility while undermining individual action.In this sense Bandura’s observation seems remarkably ahead of its time.

This quote also says something uncomfortable about human nature

Another reason this quote remains memorable is that it forces people to confront an uncomfortable truth about themselves. Most individuals like to believe that they will act responsibly in difficult situations. Once group psychology comes into the picture the reality can become more complex.People often wait for permission from others without thinking.During a conflict one hesitates to speak first because silence has already become the norm of the group. Another person notices the inappropriate behavior, but avoids intervening because no one seems concerned enough to react publicly. Over time, passivity spreads socially.That process can happen silently.Almost invisibly.Bandura seems to be interested in exactly those moments where responsibility disappears, not because people are cruel, but because humans are strongly influenced by the behavior of others.This quote feels powerful because many readers recognize themselves somewhere inside it.

Why does accountability matter now more than ever?

Modern life is increasingly interconnected, although personal accountability still matters a lot. Organizations, governments, and communities function well only when individuals feel real ownership over actions and decisions.Without a sense of ownership, problems flow endlessly.Everyone talks about him.No one solves them.That’s why strong leaders often define responsibility very clearly. Effective teams generally work best when people understand what is theirs individually, rather than assuming that collective awareness alone will automatically lead to action.Bandura’s quote quietly reminds readers that responsibility must feel personal before it can be meaningful.Otherwise, it dissolves.

Life lessons hidden inside Albert Bandura’s quotes

The quote teaches that accountability is weakened when roles remain unclear. People are more likely to act when responsibility feels personal and direct rather than vague or collective. Another important lesson involves self-awareness. Humans naturally look to groups for behavioral cues, often without consciously noticing it.This saying also highlights the danger of passive observation. Problems rarely disappear because too many people notice them at once. Awareness matters, however action matters even more.Perhaps the greatest lesson hidden inside this quote is that responsibility requires courage. Making the first move can feel uncomfortable because it breaks social inhibitions. Yet many important actions throughout history occurred because one person refused to believe that someone else would eventually deal with the problem.

Other famous quotes from Albert Bandura

final conclusion from the quote

Albert Bandura’s quote continues to resonate because it reflects the frustrating reality that people constantly face in ordinary life. Shared responsibility sounds positive in theory, although in practice, it sometimes weakens rather than strengthens accountability.People assume that someone else will speak first.Someone else will intervene.Eventually someone else will solve the problem.Bandura seems to challenge that instinct directly. His quote reminds readers that responsibility is only meaningful when individuals accept it personally rather than silently delegating it to a group around them.Maybe that’s why this line still seems so relevant. Modern life has become increasingly collective and interconnected, although meaningful change still usually starts with one person deciding not to wait for everyone else to do the same first.

TOI correspondent from London: Save the tiger. Sell ​​the forest. Destroy people. to stop. Tribal communities from Karnataka, Kerala and forests spread across the country Tamil Nadu There has been a pushback against wildlife tourism and tiger reserve expansion, accusing forest officials and conservation groups of turning ancestral homelands into a commercial safari “spectacle”, while indigenous families are evicted and forced into marginalization.More than 35 tribal villages under the Nagarhole Adivasi Jamma Pale Hakku Sthapana Samiti of Kodagu and Mysuru in the forest region of Karnataka, about 220 km southwest of Bengaluru, on Thursday issued a joint “Nagarhole Declaration” demanding an immediate stop to all transfers from the forests, saying none were voluntary.The announcement came after a marathon community dialogue held at Balekavu village inside the Nagarhole forests from May 5 to 7, where tribal activists from Wayanad in northern Kerala, the Muthanga Wildlife Area near the Kerala-Karnataka border, the Sathyamangalam tiger landscape in western Tamil Nadu and the Mudumalai Reserve in the Nilgiris gathered to form a common front in the Western Ghats tiger belt.Their charge was clear: forests once visited, hunted, worshiped and buried by indigenous communities are being fenced, branded and monetized through tiger safaris and conservation projects without the forest dwellers’ consent.The manifesto accused the forest department and the National Tiger Conservation Authority of usurping customary land and turning it into a “commercial spectacle”. It says, “What the forest bureaucracy calls core areas or critical tiger habitat is our ancestral land, our sacred space.”It says the Forest Rights Act of 2006, designed to address historical injustice against forest communities, has failed to protect them on the ground. Instead, “the injustice continues” through safari jeeps driving on lands where “our ancestors walked and are buried”, through conservation schemes imposed on villages and through generations trapped in bonded labor on tea and coffee plantations.“It is unconscionable that in states like Karnataka, Kerala and Tamil Nadu that proclaim themselves as champions of social justice, thousands of tribal families remain trapped in conditions that can only honestly be described as slavery,” the manifesto said.The document portrays the conservation fight in historical contexts, arguing that the violence unleashed under colonial forest laws never ended after independence, but only “put on a green uniform under the mask of conservation”.Tribal people alleged that notifications declaring national parks and tiger reserves were put forward without following legal procedures. He demanded that the ancestral areas be recognized as “Scheduled Areas” under the Constitution, giving stronger self-governance rights to tribal communities.The declaration claimed that forest and tourism departments in the three states have “no legitimate authority” to operate, license or commercialize wildlife safaris on traditional tribal lands without the informed consent of village councils. It demanded immediate suspension of all safari operations until such consent was obtained.The sharpest words were aimed at wildlife NGOs supporting a fortress-style conservation model. “Conservation that requires us, the indigenous people, to be evicted from the land is not conservation. This is colonization,” the declaration said.Activists said the fight over forests is no longer just about wildlife conservation. It is about whether ancient indigenous footprints will survive under the tire tracks of rapidly expanding safari tourism. Jenu Kuruba activist JK Thimma said, “We are the first people of this land. We are not encroachers.” “There is no conflict between us and the animals in the forest.”The declaration said that the rights guaranteed under the Forest Rights Act – which recognizes forest dwellers as custodians of forest resources – have allegedly been ignored, rendering many tribal communities “constitutionally invisible”.

Hyderabad: According to a recent study conducted by the Hyderabad-based ICMR-National Institute of Nutrition, frequent consumption of ultra-processed foods (UPF) such as packaged snacks, sweet drinks, biscuits and instant foods can significantly increase the risk of hypertension in urban youth.The study, recently published in the journal ‘Nutrients’, examined the dietary patterns and blood pressure profiles of 311 undergraduate students aged 18 to 24 years from colleges in Hyderabad. Researchers found that students who consumed higher amounts of high-fat and high-salt ultra-processed foods were nearly three times more likely to have increased blood pressure than those who consumed less.The findings showed that 12.5% ​​of participants already had blood pressure levels of 140/90 mmHg or higher, indicating emerging cardiovascular risk in young adults. Ultra-processed foods commonly consumed among participants included biscuits, chocolate, packaged salty snacks, bread products, sugary drinks, and instant foods.Scientists identified taste. Convenience, affordability and easy availability are the major reasons for the increasing consumption of ultra-processed foods among urban youth. The study noted that the association between UPF intake and elevated blood pressure remained significant even after adjusting for factors such as age, gender, residence and family income.The researchers used a detailed food survey based on the NOVA classification system to study how often participants consumed 24 commonly eaten ultra-processed foods. Blood pressure levels were measured using standard medical procedures.Lead authors Dr Karthikeyan S and Dr Samarasimha Reddy said the increasing dependence on packaged and convenient foods among urban youth requires urgent public health attention. “Targeted interventions are needed in colleges and universities to encourage healthy dietary choices and increase awareness of the health risks associated with excessive ultra-processed food consumption,” she said.“India is witnessing rapid nutrition changes, especially among adolescents and young adults,” said Dr Bharati Kulkarni, NIN Director, and stressed the need to strengthen nutrition literacy and create healthy food environments.

Controversy has arisen after a Democratic National Committee (DNC) staffer insulted White House adviser Stephen Miller on the party’s official X account.The controversy began when the Democrats’ official account responded to a post from Miller with the words: “Shut up you ugly fuck.” Because the message came from a verified account of the National Party rather than a personal or campaign account, it went viral.Soon after, Paulina Mangubat, a senior digital strategist at the DNC, appeared to reference the exchange from her own X account. She wrote: “The team just rated Stephen Miller, who is ugly, evil, cruel, and bald.”According to his LinkedIn profile, 30-year-old Mangubat currently serves as the Deputy Chief Mobilization Officer at the DNC. She was previously the party’s digital content and creative director and has worked on quick-response messaging and social media strategy for the Democrats.She graduated from Barnard College in 2017 and also worked as the digital and creative director for the campaign of Boston Mayor Michelle Wu, where she handled online messaging and campaign communications.Online speculation links Mangubat directly to the Democrats’ The group has the freedom to respond online and shape the tone of the party on social media platforms.The exchange began after the Democrat’s account posted support for Texas Senate candidate James Tallarico. Miller responded by falsely claiming that Democrats had nominated a transgender Senate candidate.“Democrats have made history in Texas by nominating their first transgender Senate candidate, which many have interpreted as an attack on Talarico,” Miller wrote.In another post, Miller claimed that Tallarico was “transitioning”, despite there being no evidence that the candidate is transgender.The Democrats’ account responded with a now-viral insult, prompting a sharp reaction from conservatives.Mangubat was later publicly named by Stephen Miller’s wife Katie Miller, who criticized the post and identified Mangubat as one of the people behind the account.In a post on X, Katie Miller described Mangubat as “unmarried with no kids” and said she “should [her] Put a name on it.”Mangubat responded by posting a photo of herself wearing her wedding dress and wrote: “Okay, now seems like a good time to share that I’m getting married! We put a deposit down at the venue and bought my dress.”This controversy comes just a day after another controversy related to the Democrats’ X account. A Memorial Day post of 13 dead US service members criticizing Donald Trump was removed after bipartisan criticism.Democratic Senator Tammy Duckworth condemned the message, writing, “Using our heroic dead for a political attack on Memorial Day is incredibly distasteful. I am a Democrat and condemn this post from the DNC.”