Hype the entire Women’s T20 World Cup, not just IND vs PAK: Smriti Mandhana

Vice-captain Smriti Mandhana wants her focus to remain focused on the upcoming Women’s T20 World Cup and not focus too much on her high-profile opening match against arch-rivals Pakistan. India are scheduled to begin their tournament campaign against Pakistan in Birmingham on June 14, an event that always generates massive public interest.

IND-W vs ENG-W, 3rd T20I: highlight | Achievement:

“We played the India-Pakistan match in the Commonwealth Games in Birmingham and all our tickets were sold out,” Mandhana told reporters. “Not just India-Pakistan, I think we really need Promote T20 World Cup. We don’t need to hype up just one match. It is already publicized. I am sure a lot of people will come and support us. Hopefully, we can put on a show for them.”

The 29-year-old opening batsman was speaking after India suffered a six-wicket defeat against England in the third T20I, giving the hosts a 2-1 series win. Mandhana blamed India’s inability to apply consistent pressure through dot balls during England’s chase of 181 for the defeat, something she hopes the team will rectify ahead of the ICC event.

“We certainly had a very good start with the ball and restricted England to 35 for 3,” Mandhana said. “Eventually, we might have been able to create pressure with some dot balls, but we weren’t able to do that. I can’t really take anything away from their partnership; I think they played really good cricket shots.”

England recovered from the initial shock thanks to a massive 137-run partnership for the fourth wicket between Alice Capsey, who scored 82, and captain Heather Knight, who remained unbeaten on 70.

Despite losing the series, Mandhana found reason to remain optimistic, pointing to the superb form of captain Harmanpreet Kaur, who propelled the Indian innings with a blistering 56 off 40 balls to take the team to 180 for five.

Mandhana said, “She batted surprisingly well. Harman, when she is at her best, she is a pleasure to watch.” “I think everyone is in good shape. It’s a good sign for the World Cup that Jamie, Herman, everyone looks great from the outside. Hopefully, I can see from the non-striker end.”

– ends

published by:

Amar Panikkar

Published on:

June 3, 2026 12:47 IST

Source link

Atishi criticizes CBSE revaluation process over limited payment options. india news

CBSE Revaluation Payment: Atishi criticizes Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan over limited bank options on portal
Atishi criticized Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan over limited bank options on the portal (Image credit: ANI)

Former Delhi Chief Minister and current Delhi Assembly member LOP Atishi has criticized the CBSE revaluation process, alleging that students are facing difficulties due to limited payment options on the board’s revaluation portal.In a post on X, Atishi claimed that payment for revaluation can currently be made only through State Bank of India (SBI), Canara Bank, Bank of Baroda or Indian Bank.“Another day… another achievement by @dpradhanbjp… After the late launch of the CBSE revaluation portal, students have now learned that payment can be made only through SBI, Canara Bank, Bank of Baroda or Indian Bank.“So if a student or their parents do not have an account in these banks, they cannot apply for revaluation! The Prime Minister and his Cabinet have taken mismanagement to new heights”This criticism comes after concerns were raised about the delayed launch of the CBSE revaluation portal amid the OSM tender controversy.The controversy escalated when students started reporting smudged answer sheets, missing pages, mismatched scanned copies and frequent glitches during the revaluation process.Opposition targeted BJP Other opposition leaders Aditya Thackeray and Kapil Sibal also criticized the central government’s handling of the CBSE controversy following the transfer of the board chairman and secretary.Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Thackeray questioned whether the transfer of the two officers was a “major action” by the BJP government, calling it inadequate.Meanwhile, senior lawyer and Rajya Sabha MP Kapil Sibal described the episode as a “CBSE failure” and alleged that the government was “blaming the small fish and saving the big fish.”He questioned why the alleged irregularities, including claims related to the controversial contract, were not being investigated and asked where agencies like CBI and ED were in this matter.CBSE says the website is being improvedProviding updates on the CBSE verification and revaluation portal, officials said the platform is currently supporting around 14,000 concurrent users and over 28,000 successful submissions have been recorded till 10 pm.A post on

Source link

Blake Lively criticized for ‘misusing’ California survivor protection law in Justin Baldoni controversy.

Blake Lively criticized for 'misusing' California survivor protection law in Justin Baldoni controversy

Victoria Burke, the architect of California’s survivor-protection law, has publicly condemned Blake LivelyLegal strategy in ongoing dispute with ‘It End’s With Us’ director and co-star Justin Baldoni. Responding to the actress’ latest filing, Burke discussed her concerns on ‘The Megyn Kelly Show’ about how the law has become part of a high-profile legal battle.In a clip shared by the official handle, Burke was asked ‘Is Blake Lively completely abusing the purpose of the California Survivor Act in her legal fee claim?’ To this he shared, “You made it about the worry that most survivors have, that a lot of times a defamation lawsuit is used to silence them, because whoever gets it realizes that it could cost five, six or seven figures over many years to defend them, and it’s always cheaper to keep quiet. So the concern was that if you were to go ahead and defend it and you win, and show that you did not have malice, you would recover your attorney’s fees and damages.”“Also the purpose I believed in was to get lawyers to take on these very difficult cases, and so that has been my main concern with the bill.”Burke, who drafted the law, said the law is designed to protect victims who come forward with allegations of sexual assault, harassment and discrimination. “Never imagined that my bill would become a story that everyone will be watching,” he wrote in a statement publicly shared on megynkelly.com.Criticizing the actress and her team, she said, “As the architect of the bill, I strongly believe in the constitutionality of our bill. I am unhappy with Blake Lively weaponizing it as a PR redemption tool.” [and] His team. “To be honest, I don’t think the judge should award attorney fees in this case.”Burke further argued that the focus on the law had shifted away from the survivors it was designed to protect. “I was worried that this was just going to be a PR campaign for him, and it wasn’t going to be about the survivors anymore. I didn’t want him turning my bill into the Met Gala,” she was quoted as saying.Lively’s legal battle with Baldoni came back into the news after the actress claimed she faced retaliation after making sexual harassment claims on the production of their 2024 film ‘It End’s With Us’. Elaine Garofalo, the attorney representing Baldoni, filed a petition before U.S. District Judge Lewis J. Lyman that Lively was trying to make “one last run around a jury trial” through an application for attorney’s fees, which was dropped when an agreement was reached before the trial began in May.

Source link

Iran attacks Kuwait: Watch: Air defense war over Kuwait, Patriot missiles respond to Iranian attack

WATCH: Air defense war over Kuwait, Patriot missiles respond to Iranian attack

Tensions rose again in the Middle East early Wednesday after Iran fired missiles towards US military facilities in Kuwait and Bahrain. According to US Central Command (CENTCOM), the missiles failed to hit their targets and were either intercepted or separated before impact. In response, US forces launched attacks on Iranian military facilities.The night sky over the Gulf lit up as Iranian missiles and drones headed toward American bases. American air defense systems intercepted incoming threats near Kuwait City, preventing them from reaching Ali Al Salem Air Base in Kuwait.US air defense used Patriot missiles to respond to the Iranian threat.The latest exchange comes amid a conflict that has intensified since the US launched a major military campaign against Iran earlier this year. Since then, the two sides have exchanged attacks, bringing the region closer to a wider confrontation. Several attempts at dialogue and negotiation have been made, but there has been no success in reducing tensions.The US military responded strongly to Iran’s action by attacking Qeshm Island.Also read: Iran launches attacks on US targets in Kuwait; Air defense intercepts missiles, dronesAccording to US officials, Iran fired missiles toward Kuwait and Bahrain, but none reached their intended targets. Two missiles targeting Kuwait broke up mid-flight, while the missiles targeting Bahrain were intercepted by US and Bahraini forces.The development comes after reports from Iran’s semi-official Fars and Tasnim news agencies claimed that Tehran has stopped communicating with mediators about extending a ceasefire in its conflict with the US and Israel. chairman donald trump disputed the reports, saying talks were ongoing.The reports published by Fars and Tasnim, considered close to Iran’s paramilitary Revolutionary Guard, came as tensions also rose on Israel’s northern front with the Iran-backed Hezbollah group in Lebanon.A regional official involved in mediation efforts, speaking anonymously to The Associated Press, said Iran did not negotiate with mediators on Tuesday after insisting that a ceasefire must be implemented in Lebanon before talks could continue.

What is the most worrying aspect of recent military actions in the Middle East?

In a separate development, the US military said it targeted another oil tanker attempting to reach an Iranian port in violation of the US blockade. According to CENTCOM, it was the seventh ship to be intercepted while trying to circumvent sanctions.The Botswana-flagged merchant vessel M/T Lexi was stopped after her crew allegedly ignored repeated warnings for 24 hours. CENTCOM said one aircraft fired a Hellfire missile into the ship’s engine room, disabling the ship.

Source link

The experiment was aborted too early? How Annamalai, who was ‘sidelined’ in Tamil Nadu, moved away from BJP. india news

After the election defeat, the discussion about Annamalai's exit has intensified amid speculations about a new party.

New Delhi: Annamalai Kuppusamy (K Annamalai), who not long ago BJPIts biggest face and its biggest hope in Tamil Nadu has left the party. The former IPS officer, who joined the BJP in 2020 and led the party in the state like never before, is all set to form his own “regional organisation” as he feels being part of a national party “hinders his development”.According to reports, Annamalai is in Delhi and has thanked all his party chiefs, including Amit Shah, while submitting his resignation, although a formal announcement is yet to be made. Some in the BJP expect a U-turn, but sources close to Annamalai claim that the former IPS officer has moved on and wants to “put his plans into action.”Annamalai has also submitted a detailed report analyzing what went wrong for the BJP in the 2026 elections and has reportedly told top BJP leaders how she was “sidelined” in the party. While the formal separation is happening now, the ground for this separation was laid ahead of the 2026 assembly elections when the BJP abandoned Annamalai’s vision for the party in Tamil Nadu.So, what went wrong?To understand this, let us step back and look at Annamalai’s spectacular rise in the BJP.The BJP, which had been struggling to find its place and relevance in Tamil Nadu politics for years, found a ray of hope in Annamalai. The former IPS officer, who left his job in May 2019 and was working for social welfare through his NGO “We the Leader Foundation”, wanted to enter politics to “bring about a change in the system”. Interestingly, BJP was not Annamalai’s first choice as he wanted to start his political innings with Rajinikanth. But when the superstar’s political plans failed, Annamalai chose the BJP – a party which he said “had a nationalist outlook and a merit-based platform.”Annamalai joined BJP in 2020. Although he lost the 2021 assembly election from Aravakuruchi constituency, he helped the BJP win 2 seats in the western region of the state.The BJP immediately realized Annamalai’s potential and within a year he was made the state party chief. Once firmly in power, Annamalai led his ‘En Man En Makkal’ (My Land, My People) march across Tamil Nadu in 2023, taking the BJP’s popularity to a new high. There was such optimism and hope in the exercise that the top national leadership of the BJP graced it. While Amit Shah inaugurated the 200-day padayatra covering all 234 assembly constituencies in the state, Prime Minister Narendra Modi ended it with a massive public address in February 2024.The publicity and hope generated by Annamalai’s padayatra may have convinced the BJP to part ways with its ally. AIADMK And choose to contest alone in the 2024 Lok Sabha elections in Tamil Nadu. The highlight of Annamalai’s political aggression was his sharp and vocal criticism of Dravidian politics and its symbols. Despite the alliance with the AIADMK, he did not spare their leaders either – a factor that ultimately played a significant role in the alienation between the allies. Annamalai’s padayatra took the BJP’s vote share in Tamil Nadu to a record high of 11.38% in the 2024 Lok Sabha elections. This was a huge jump from the 3.62% figure the party got in the 2019 Lok Sabha elections. But unfortunately, the increase in votes did not translate into seats and the BJP could not open its account for the second consecutive Lok Sabha election. In the 2014 Lok Sabha elections, BJP won 1 seat with 5.56% vote share.This probably prompted the BJP to rethink about its ties with the AIADMK and despite Annamalai’s very strong objections – the alliance was revived ahead of the 2026 assembly elections in the state. And it sidelined the former IPS officer, who was later removed as state BJP chief to appease the party’s Dravidian ally.AIADMK sets conditions for BJP in 2026 assembly elections. The regional party ensured that Annamalai was not only removed from the post of state BJP chief but also had no role in deciding candidates for the assembly elections. Annamalai stayed away and did not contest the 2026 assembly elections. Complete dominance of Annamalai in 2023 was transformed into almost complete isolation in 2026. However, on May 4, when the results were declared, Annamalai was proved right and the BJP’s alliance experiment with the AIADMK failed miserably. The saffron party could win only one seat in the assembly. But the former state president still remained silent.Annamalai’s first voice of dissentWhen Annamalai openly hit out at the Union Education Ministry over its notification making three languages ​​compulsory for Class IX students for the first time in six years, it was the first clear sign of an impending rebellion and led to speculation about her possible exit from the party.On May 15, CBSE issued a notification to all affiliated schools to introduce the third compulsory language for class IX students from the current academic year, pushing back the earlier scheduled deadline of 2029-30.Responding to the move, Annamalai wrote on Expecting a ninth grade student to learn a new language in such a short period of time will only put pressure on children and affect their overall learning outcomes.The fact that he decided to make public his differences with the BJP on language policy, which has always been a sensitive issue in Tamil Nadu, was a sign that he wanted to chart his own course.Although Annamalai may not have openly rebelled, his move to resign does not come as a surprise. Ultimately, his efforts to ensure a distinct identity for the BJP in Tamil Nadu were ruined when the Delhi leadership insisted on an AIADMK alliance in the 2026 assembly elections.An experiment aborted too early?For the BJP, Annamalai’s exit would mean a fresh start in Tamil Nadu. While Annamalai was not leading the state BJP in either of the two assembly elections held during his tenure, his active presence had energized the party. Annamalai was made the BJP Tamil Nadu chief after the 2021 assembly elections, in which the BJP won 4 seats with 2.62% vote share. He stepped down as head of state in 2025, a year before the 2026 assembly elections in which the party’s tally slipped to 1 with a marginal increase in vote share at 2.99%. With Annamalai’s exit, the BJP will be wary of a possible exodus of local leaders and workers from the party.The fact that the people of Tamil Nadu voted overwhelmingly for budding politician Vijay and his party TVK shows that there was room for a new experiment in Tamil Nadu. BJP started on that path with Annamalai but abandoned it midway. Though Annamalai is nowhere close to Vijay’s fan following in the state, the truth is that the former IPS officer, often fondly referred to as “Singham”, had enjoyed a good amount of popularity among the youth of the state. No wonder the “what if” question will continue to haunt both the BJP and Annamalai.But for the BJP – it was perhaps a Hobson’s choice – to go ahead with its Annamalai experiment or join hands with its old ally, the AIADMK, and form an anti-DMK front. In the end it chose its old ally, leaving Annamalai no option but to leave the alliance. Ironically, the same aggression that made him popular within and within the BJP became the reason for his leaving the party.

Source link

CUET UG 2026 re-exam dates announced: NTA issues new admit cards for candidates affected by technical glitch

CUET UG 2026 re-exam dates announced: NTA issues new admit cards for candidates affected by technical glitch

The National Testing Agency (NTA) has announced that candidates affected by technical glitches during the Common University Entrance Test (CUET) UG 2026 on May 30 will be given one more chance to take the exam.The agency said re-examination for the affected candidates will be conducted on June 6 and June 7. New admit cards have also been released and can be downloaded from the official CUET portal.In a post on Twitter, NTA said, “Updated admit cards are now available for the affected CUET (UG) 2026 candidates. The revised exam dates are 06 and 07 June 2026. Candidates can download their admit cards from the official portal.”The decision comes days after the start of Shift 1 of the exam was delayed at several centers due to a technical issue. According to NTA, 3,765 candidates who left their exam centers due to the disruption will be allowed to re-appear in the exam through a one-time special opportunity.The issue was first reported by Tata Consultancy Services (TCS), which is involved in conducting the exam. NTA said that due to technical glitches on the part of the company, there was a delay in the commencement of the examination at some centers on May 30.After the problem was identified, the agency revised the afternoon shift schedule. Candidates were asked to report from 2.30 pm, while the exam started at 4 pm instead of the originally scheduled 3 pm. NTA also assured the candidates that full compensatory time will be provided so that no student wastes the exam time.It was later confirmed that candidates who had completed biometric registration and were present at their exam centers but could not complete the exam due to glitches will be given one more chance.CUET UG is conducted by NTA for admission to undergraduate programs offered by central, state and many private universities. Since its launch in 2022, the exam has become one of the biggest entrance exams in the country.The examination has been conducted in Computer Based Testing (CBT) mode from 2025 onwards. According to NTA, the CBT format was introduced to improve standardization, efficiency and logistics in conducting the examination nationwide.

Source link

10 largest island countries in the world: Indonesia, Japan, Papua New Guinea among the largest island countries. world News

10 largest island countries in the world: Indonesia, Japan, Papua New Guinea among the largest island countries

Standing back from a world map, the outline of land against water appears less well-defined than before. Some countries disintegrate into hundreds or even thousands of pieces, scattered like broken glass across vast expanses of ocean. Others sit almost entirely on a single group of rock but still qualify as island nations in their own right. There are places where distances between communities are measured in ferry hours rather than roads, and others where a capital city is closer to another continent than to its outer edges. worldatlas The report says that these countries are not sitting comfortably in one size. In a way, they flow across water that has long shaped the way people live within them.

10 Largest island countries by area

Post
Country
Area (km²)
Area (mile²)
1 Indonesia 1,904,569 735,358
2 madagascar 587,041 226,658
3 Papua New Guinea 462,840 178,704
4 Japan 377,915 145,913
5 malaysia 329,847 127,355
6 philippines 300,000 115,831
7 new zealand 268,838 103,798
8 united kingdom 243,610 94,058
9 Cuba 110,860 42,804
10 iceland 103,000 39,769

The world’s largest island countries

Indonesia

Indonesia sits in a long arc between Asia and Australia, divided into a group of islands that go on and on once you start counting. The spread is so wide that the country crosses different time zones without much effort. Some islands are densely populated and built up, other islands are quiet and forested, rarely mentioned on external maps.Java is home to a large number of people, while the shared parts of Sumatra and Borneo make the country feel unequally burdened. Farther east, the western part of New Guinea adds another layer of distance, making the country feel cohesive rather than holistic in the general sense. Traveling across it is less a journey within one place and more a sequence of different worlds connected by the sea.

madagascar

Madagascar is alone off the African coast, separated by a wide strip of ocean that has physically isolated it for millions of years. Most of the country lies on one large island, surrounded by a few smaller pieces that barely change its overall outline.That long isolation has shaped life there in unusual ways. Species evolved without much outside influence, which is why many of the plants and animals found there do not appear anywhere else. The landscape shifts from dense forest to arid fields with little transitions, giving the island a sense of internal contradiction that seems almost self-contained.

Papua New Guinea

Papua New Guinea occupies the eastern part of New Guinea and surrounding islands. The terrain is steep in places, densely forested in some places, and often cut off by natural barriers, making movement between communities difficult.Within that geography there is an extraordinary breadth of languages, hundreds of which are still in use. Many evolved in isolation across valleys and ranges, where contact between groups remained limited for generations. Nearby islands add another layer of isolation, making the country fragmented not only by water but also by land that resists easy travel.

Japan

Japan runs a narrow chain along the edge of East Asia that passes through cold northern waters and into subtropical regions. The main islands form a clear spine, but smaller surrounding islands complicate any simple picture of the country.At one point, official mapping suggested a fixed number of islands. Subsequent surveys, using improved methods, revised the figure sharply upward. Nothing changed about the land, yet the way it was counted changed. The coastline remains irregular due to volcanic activity and changing seas, giving the country a consistently measured, slightly uncertain geography.

malaysia

Malaysia exists in two distinct parts, divided by an expanse of ocean that keeps them physically separated. Half of it lies on the Malay Peninsula, which shares a land border with Thailand. The other is located on Indonesia and Brunei as well as Borneo.This dissociation affects daily activity in practical ways. Flights often replace overland travel, and national administrations extend open water intervals. Islands and coastal fringes add further fragmentation, although most of the population is concentrated in urban centers that support each half of the country.

philippines

The Philippines covers a wide part of the western Pacific, made up of thousands of islands of varying shapes and sizes. Some are so large that they can contain major cities and entire provinces, while others are little more than strips of land surrounded by rocks and deep water.Three broad regional groupings help to understand this, although they do not remove the feeling of fragmentation. Travel between islands often depends on weather and sea conditions, which can change quickly. The result is a country where distances are measured less in kilometers and more in terms of time taken to cross water.

new zealand

New Zealand is far from major landmasses, consisting primarily of two large islands and a long list of smaller islands. The South Island has mountains, rivers and wide open spaces, while the North Island contains most of the population and administrative centres.Despite its size, the country feels relatively limited, with most people living in coastal cities. Beyond those areas, the landscape opens up to increasingly less populated areas. The sea plays a continuing role in shaping that isolation, with even internal travel often involving long distances between settlements.

united kingdom

The United Kingdom is surrounded by Great Britain, a large island that holds England, Scotland, and Wales. Nearby there is another large territory shared with the Republic of Ireland, with Northern Ireland forming part of the political structure on its side.The surrounding waters have long influenced how the country connects internally and externally. Even within the main island the distances are so short that no point sits too far from the coast. Offshore areas and small islands extend the reach further, although the mainland remains firmly concentrated on a single stretch of land.

Cuba

Cuba is located at a point where several major bodies of water meet, giving it a long, narrow shape extending into the Caribbean. The main island dominates, with smaller surrounding islands adding texture to its outline without changing its overall appearance.Its position places it close to other major landmasses, yet clearly separated by water. Coastal areas vary between quiet stretches and more developed urban areas, while inland areas remain less densely populated. The island’s size makes travel across it relatively simple compared to the more fragmented archipelago.

iceland

Iceland is located in the North Atlantic, closer to the Arctic Circle than continental Europe. Most of the population is concentrated in a small part of the island, while large areas remain uninhabited due to the volcanic terrain and harsh weather.The land slowly continues to shift as tectonic forces push it apart. New structures appear over time, while others change shape under geothermal activity. Despite its size relative to the list, it stands as a single landmass, whose shape is caused by the movement of the sea beneath the surface and around it.

Source link

Before swearing in Karnataka, BJP made fun of DK Shivakumar through AI video. india news

Before swearing in Karnataka, BJP shares AI video making fun of DK Shivakumar
Before swearing in Karnataka, BJP shared AI video making fun of DK Shivakumar (Image- BJP Karnataka X)

ahead of congress leader DK ShivakumarAs the swearing in ceremony of Chief Minister of Karnataka BJP launched sharp attack on Wednesday congress government Through a series of posts on X, Criticism and allegations of failures in governance were made.In an AI-generated video shared late on Tuesday night, BJP Karnataka showed DK Shivakumar traveling in an SUV on water-logged roads.In another post, Karnataka BJP accused the Congress government of neglecting farmers ahead of the monsoon season. The party alleged that the state government has failed to ensure supply of adequate and quality seeds and fertilizers, while also not compensating farmers who faced crop loss due to rains.“The Congress government in the state has completely neglected the farmers. It has completely failed to provide adequate, quality seeds and fertilizers to farmers preparing for the monsoon,” the BJP said.It further reads, “For Congress, farmers are just garbage; until the government with such mentality is removed, farmers will not get peace.”The BJP also targeted the Congress government over the welfare of Dalits and alleged that it won votes from the community but failed to address their concerns after coming to power.BJP Karnataka accused the government of adopting “anti-Dalit” policies and neglecting infrastructure and development in Dalit communities, saying, “Coming to power by securing Dalit votes, only to push the same Dalit community into the most miserable condition is the hallmark of this Congress government.”DK Shivkumar will take oath as CM today64-year-old Congress leader DK Shivakumar will take oath as the Chief Minister of Karnataka today. The swearing-in ceremony will take place at around 4 pm in the Glass House of Lok Bhavan, where Governor Thaawarchand Gehlot will administer the oath of office and secrecy.A group of ministers along with Shivakumar are expected to take oath in the first phase of new cabinet formation.Shivakumar was elected Congress Legislature Party leader last week, days after outgoing Chief Minister Siddaramaiah stepped down following instructions from the party high command.

Source link

More Trump tariffs? Amid trade deal talks, US names India in Section 301 findings; proposes additional duties

More Trump tariffs? Amid trade deal talks, US names India in Section 301 findings; proposes additional duties

Amid the ongoing talks on India-US trade deal, the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) has named India among the countries with unfair trade practices. Based on these findings, USTR has proposed imposing additional tariffs of 10% to 12.5% ​​on imports from the affected countries.USTR released the results of 60 investigations conducted under Section 301, in which India has been included among 54 economies that, according to its assessment, do not have adequate measures in place to restrict or effectively prevent the import of goods allegedly produced using forced labor. The development comes as senior trade officials from the US and India are engaged in three-day discussions in New Delhi with an aim to take forward a proposed bilateral trade agreement.Read this also ‘US-India trade talks now on comma and full stop’: Piyush Goyal

What has USTR said?

In a notification, USTR said countries that already implement restrictions on imports involving forced labor, have committed to introducing and enforcing such measures under reciprocal trade arrangements, or operate a partial framework that restricts the entry of certain goods produced through forced labor will face an additional tariff of 10%.For countries that do not meet these criteria, the proposed additional duty has been set at 12.5%. USTR has also suggested a separate mechanism for textiles and apparel that would allow a specified quantity of imports from selected economies to enter the US market at a reduced Section 301 tariff rate.The agency further indicated that it intends to pursue responsible trade actions based on the findings of these investigations.“The failure of our most important trading partners to address the import of goods made with forced labor is unacceptable. This creates a dynamic where American workers are forced to compete globally on an uneven playing field,” said Ambassador Jamieson Greer.According to USTR, the following 54 economies have failed to establish and effectively enforce restrictions on the import of goods produced with forced labor:Algeria; Angola; Argentina; Australia; Bahamas; Bahrain; Bangladesh; Brazil; Cambodia; Chile; China, People’s Republic; Colombia; Costa Rica; Dominican Republic; Egypt; El Salvador; Guatemala; Guyana; Honduras; Hong Kong, China; India; Iraq; Israel; Japan; Jordan; Kazakhstan; Kuwait; Libya; Malaysia; Morocco; New Zealand; Nicaragua; Nigeria; Norway; Oman; Peru; Philippines; Qatar; Russia; Saudi Arabia; Singapore; South Africa; South Korea; Sri Lanka; Switzerland; Taiwan; Thailand; Trinidad and Tobago; Turkiye; United Arab Emirates; United Kingdom; Uruguay; Venezuela; And Vietnam.These six economies have failed to effectively enforce bans on imports of goods produced with forced labour: Canada; Ecuador, European Union; Indonesia; Mexico; And Pakistan.

What is Section 301?

Section 301 is a provision of the US Trade Act of 1974 that gives the USTR the authority to investigate the trade practices, policies, and actions of foreign governments. Its purpose is to determine whether such measures are unfair, discriminatory, or impose an undue burden on U.S. trade and commercial interests.The provision gives the US administration the authority to take corrective action if the investigation concludes that a country has engaged in practices deemed harmful to US commerce. Such measures may include imposing higher tariffs, imposing trade restrictions, or adopting other measures designed to address identified concerns.

Source link

‘Economic fury’ on Iran: US seizes Tehran’s largest crypto network amid peace talks

'Economic fury' on Iran: US seizes Tehran's largest crypto network amid peace talks

After unleashing ‘epic fury’ on Iran, the United States has launched another front to increase its pressure on the country. The United States on Tuesday sanctioned Iran’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, Nobitex, and several of its senior executives, accusing the platform of helping the Iranian government and sanctioned entities circumvent Western sanctions. The move, named ‘Economic Fury’, is part of the Trump administration’s efforts to increase economic pressure on Tehran amid the ongoing conflict between the US, Iran and Israel.According to the US Treasury Department, Nobitex processed more than half of Iran’s digital asset revenues last year and played a key role in the country’s sanctions evasion network. Treasury officials alleged that the exchange helped move assets and money out of Iran after the start of U.S. combat operations, allowing the regime to protect its funds despite Internet blackouts.Those sanctioned include Amir Hossein Raad, chairman and co-founder of Nobitex, the exchange’s chief executive officer, and brothers Syed Mohammed Ali Aghmir Mohammed Ali and Syed Mohammed Aghmir Mohammed Ali.

Iranian entities under sanctions

Several Iranian crypto exchanges and officials have been sanctioned by the US:Nobitex: Iran’s largest digital asset exchange, handling more than 50% of the country’s crypto flows in 2025. The US alleges that it facilitated transactions linked to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), helped it evade sanctions, and enabled regime insiders to access international crypto markets.Amir Hussain Raad: Chairman, co-founder and former CEO of Nobitex. The US says he helped restore the exchange’s operations after a major hack in June 2025 and sanctioned him for his leadership role in the company.Syed Mohammad Ali Aghmeer Mohammad Ali: Co-founder of Nobitex and member of the influential Kharrazi family. The US sanctioned him for allegedly supporting the exchange.Syed Mohammad Agmir Mohammad Ali: Co-founder and Head of Blockchain at Nobitex. He was approved for his senior role at the exchange.Syed Ali Khoi: Current CEO and former Product and Marketing Director of Nobitex. The US sanctioned him as a senior official of the company.Valeex: Iran’s second-largest crypto exchange is expected to account for about 12% of the country’s digital asset flows in 2025. The US alleges that it facilitated transactions involving the IRGC.Bitpin: An Iranian crypto exchange that received approximately 10% of Iran’s crypto flows in 2025. US officials say it processed transactions linked to the IRGC, while some investors are allegedly linked to sanctions-evasion efforts.Ramzinex: The Tehran-based crypto exchange was founded in 2018. It has processed more than $2.45 billion in transactions and has been accused by the US of handling transactions involving the IRGC and a government-backed financial institution, as well as facilitating sanctions evasion.

Why has the US imposed sanctions on Iranian crypto firms?

The sanctions were imposed following an investigation that identified Nobitex as a key hub in a parallel financial system used to process millions of dollars for Iran’s central bank and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). The report also found that the exchange continued to operate during a government-imposed internet shutdown, facilitating transactions worth millions of dollars.In a statement, Treasury Secretary Scott Besant said, “While Iran’s economy remains in rapid decline, the regime has chosen to co-opt digital asset technologies for its own corrupt agenda, including evading sanctions and moving funds out of the country.”The Treasury Department said that Nobitex had provided “significant support” to the Iranian government and facilitated a “significant number” of digital transactions involving both the IRGC and Iran’s central bank.“After the start of U.S. combat operations in Iran, Nobitex played a role in moving assets and funds out of Iran to protect the regime’s assets despite Internet blackouts,” the department said.US officials have repeatedly argued that Iran relies heavily on cryptocurrencies and other digital assets to avoid sanctions. Speaking at the Reagan National Economic Forum earlier this month, Besant said, “We have seized almost a billion dollars of their cryptocurrency.”The latest sanctions are part of a broader economic pressure campaign against Iran. The administration has also imposed secondary sanctions on countries doing business with individuals, companies and vessels under Iranian control, including both allies and rivals. Banks have also been warned about handling Iranian funds.Meanwhile, Tehran has halted communications with mediators regarding a possible extension of the ceasefire in the conflict with the US and Israel. However, US President Donald Trump disputed the report and said discussions were ongoing.

Source link