Distances are visible in strong alliance!

In Tamil Nadu, where the Congress is fighting the elections under a long-standing alliance DMK Under the leadership of MK Stalin, the lack of this alliance is clearly visible.In the last elections, Rahul Gandhi and Stalin shared the stage, exuded cordiality and strengthened the alliance through visible coordination. This time that visual continuity was missing.Despite the high election stakes, both the leaders were not seen together in any joint rally. The absence sparked both political comment and opposition attacks.See complete coverage of 2026 assembly electionsTOI local editor Arun Ram calls it a clear missed opportunity: “DMK and Congress have failed to bring these two leaders together… I think if they had come together for at least a public rally, they would have given a strong message that the alliance is strong enough.”

Explanations from DMK circles, that aligning the schedules would have disrupted Stalin’s campaign by dozens of stops, have done little to offset the perception costs.This cost becomes more acute when compared with the presence of Aam Aadmi Party chief Arvind Kejriwal, who recently shared the stage with Stalin during a road show in Chennai. For viewers and voters, the scenes were telling: a leader with limited electoral stake in Tamil Nadu coming forward to signal unity, while the key face of the Congress remained absent from the joint platform.

perception takes risks

The difference in optics in Tamil Nadu is not evident alone. This comes against the backdrop of internal tensions within the alliance.A section of the state Congress leadership had earlier raised the issue of power-sharing by pushing the idea of ​​a coalition arrangement – ​​which the DMK has strongly opposed. While the central leadership moved to address these demands, the political signal had already been sent.In such a situation, ‘missing’ Rahul Gandhi has other meanings. In this case, the joint rally could have at least served as a visible assurance that differences, real or perceived, would not affect the alliance in the state.Arun Ram highlights this dynamic: “..given this background we have seen a section of Congress leaders demanding a share in power… There were rumors of some tension at least between Rahul Gandhi and MK Stalin.”The absence of a common platform allowed those rumors to gain momentum. Rival parties such as the All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (AIADMK) and the BJP increasingly escalated these perceptions, causing the alliance to become strained rather than cohesive.

BJP leader K Annamalai said, “Rahul Gandhi does not want to campaign with MK Stalin.” He wants to campaign separately. MK Stalin does not want to campaign with Rahul Gandhi; He wants to run a different campaign. In the last elections, the relationship between Rahul and Stalin was seen as one of deep personal cordiality. From giving sweets to calling each other “elder and younger brothers”, the plan was designed to instill a sense of unity among grassroots workers.However, this time, the frame was surprisingly blank, as both the leaders were working on parallel tracks during the election campaign.

‘MIA’ Rahul Gandhi

What we saw in Tamil Nadu during this assembly election is nothing new. A similar pattern of limited joint campaigning by Rahul Gandhi was seen in key states.Congress alliance in Bihar is led by RJD Tejashwi Yadav Questions have also been faced regarding coordination.Tejashwi’s high-frequency campaign, which often included multiple rallies a day, was not matched by Rahul Gandhi’s consistent joint presence. In the run-up to the 2025 elections, reports of a “postponed” joint Vote Rights Yatra with Tejashwi emerged, further lending credence to the idea that the two leaders struggled to coordinate their presence even when the stake was survival.The alliance with the National Conference (NC) in Jammu and Kashmir is equally fraught with visible gaps. With the 2024 elections and subsequent changes in local administration over the next two years, the chemistry between Omar Abdullah and Rahul Gandhi has fluctuated wildly.

Contradictions within the Indian faction

Meanwhile, Arvind Kejriwal’s decision to join the 2026 assembly campaign for Stalin and Mamata has also highlighted differences in the way coalition politics is conducted within the broader opposition.Leaders like Arvind Kejriwal have adopted a more proactive approach – campaigning in states, sharing platforms with regional allies, and strengthening the broader anti-BJP narrative even in areas where his party has limited direct stakes.

This approach is visible not only in Tamil Nadu but also in West Bengal, where Kejriwal is expected to campaign at the invitation of Mamata Banerjee.At the grassroots level, the alliance functions through coordination between workers of different parties. This coordination largely depends on leadership signals.

The price of not seeing each other

Under the leadership of Rahul Gandhi, the Congress has been successful in forming alliances that are both strategic and necessary on paper. But elections are not fought only on paper.They are fought on platforms, in images and through moments that signal unity to voters and confidence to workers.A single joint rally in Tamil Nadu could have strengthened the perception of a united alliance.Instead, his absence has repeatedly raised a question: Is the coalition as united on the ground as it is on paper?Tamil Nadu already went to polls in a single phase on Thursday, with over 84% turnout breaking all previous records. On May 4, when the results will be declared, the effectiveness of the Congress-DMK alliance will finally be judged not just by the optics, but by the electoral results on the ground.It remains to be seen whether the perceived difference in coordination between Rahul Gandhi and MK Stalin translates into votes.