He pointed out that previous generations of players were judged on all aspects of their game, not just their batting ability. He said, “We respected players like Inzamam-ul-Haq for his batting, but we also looked at his fielding and other aspects of his game. This helped people to assess a player properly. Right now, someone can come in, face a few balls, show his hitting ability and then disappear without showing the other side of his cricket.”Manjrekar further argued that young players should also experience pressure situations on the field, including dealing with mistakes and learning from them.“We’re not expecting to see all 3 dimensions of a player. But the more I think about it, it all makes sense, and you’re right, Suryavanshi, you want to see him on the field and see what happens and also be under pressure. If he’s a great batsman but has a bit of a liability in the field, I’d like to see him exploited. This is also something that we have experienced as fielders when we drop a catch in times of tension, which is frustrating to bat and cool down. You don’t want one of the highest levels of the game to be that easy,” he said.The former Indian batsman also said that international cricket needs well-rounded cricketers rather than specialists who contribute in just one area. According to him, the Royals may be inadvertently limiting Suryavanshi’s development by using him only as an impact player.“Definitely (is playing him as an influencer hindering his development as a fielder). And that’s an issue that will remain. India won the T20 World Cup despite the influencer player rule, despite a player like Shivam Dubey not bowling at all, but still did well in the T20 World Cup. So things are happening. But I believe a cricketer, not just anyone, will just come and tuck, tuck, tuck, then a Will take a break and enjoy life. I just wanted to test every player a little more, not just if he is a good bowler, bowls his 4 overs, I would like to see him in the field as well,” Manjrekar concluded.