Bhopal: A four-month-old baby girl died in Satna, allegedly suffering from malnutrition, while her twin brother remains in intensive care, exposing lapses in rural health surveillance after the siblings were treated by a quack for 15 days.Supriya alias Priyanshi and Naitik of Pathra village of Majhgawan were born on December 21, 2025 with a weight of 2 kg and less.Despite being high risk, he was never enrolled in a nutrition rehabilitation center.After suffering from vomiting, fever and diarrhea for two weeks, he was taken to a quack doctor in Jugulpur instead of the hospital.

The quack treated him for about 15 days.Both of them were brought to Majhgawan Health Center on April 21 severely malnourished – Naitik weighed 2.93 kg and dehydrated, while Supriya weighed 2.86 kg.Both were referred to Satna District Hospital where they were kept in the Pediatric ICU.The next day, when the girl’s condition deteriorated, both of them were referred to the Medical College of Rewa. The girl died soon after referral, while the boy is undergoing treatment.Officials said the infants were given cow and goat milk because their mothers were too weak to breastfeed. There was a lack of guidance on child nutrition in the family. This was his fourth delivery; One child has already died.A joint health and WCD report flagged several failings in the case.Although registered on a nutrition tracker and given vaccination at birth, the twins were lost to follow-up. Home visits were not made regularly.Field staff failed to ensure timely referral as children remained ill with quacks for 15 days. Mandatory NRC entry for low birth weight was abandoned.The report held the supervisor and ANM responsible for poor monitoring and confirmed action against the Anganwadi worker.Block Medical Officer Dr. Rupesh Soni had lodged an FIR against quack Premlal Anuragi of Jugulpur on April 22. Raids on his clinic found that he ran the clinic without a license, used banned drugs and improperly disposed of medical waste. Medicines were confiscated and the clinic was sealed. There have been repeated cases of malnutrition in Majhgawan, raising concerns over health care and nutrition awareness at the grassroots level.

Laura Loomer accused Candace Owens of receiving money from the Southern Poverty Law Center, sparking widespread online debate. The claims come as the nonprofit faces allegations of fraud and funding extremist informants. Social media users promoted the allegations without verified evidence. Meanwhile, officials including Kash Patel have outlined serious allegations against the SPLC, which the organization has rejected.

A new controversy has erupted as Laura Loomer has accused Candace Owens of being paid off by the Southern Poverty Law Center. The charge comes as the nonprofit faces serious allegations that it funded extremist informants. Loomer’s sharp statement quickly spread across the Internet, sparking heated reactions and speculation about hidden political allegiances.The story grew when social media users shared unverified claims and screenshots that they believed showed the connection. Some also wondered whether other conservatives might also join in. Despite viral momentum, no confirmed evidence has confirmed these allegations. But the situation has put both Owens and the nonprofit under a harsh spotlight, turning it into a larger debate about credibility, funding and influence in political discourse.

Laura Loomer’s allegation links Candace Owens to SPLC as investigation sparks debate

Laura Loomer accused Candace Owens of taking money from SPLC. She said, “Was the SPLC paying Candace Owens $500,000 a year to plagiarize David Duke?”Some other social media users pointed to alleged ties between Owens and the SPLC. One wrote, “How much money is Candace Owens taking from SPLC. I was wondering how she was getting away with that on YouTube. Now it all makes sense.”Another wrote, “So when will it be made public that Nick Fuentes is on the SPLC’s payroll? Or Dan Blizerian, or Ian Carroll, or Candace Owens?” A third wrote, “Does the SPLC have a thing for Candace Owens? Hmm.”After which the matter escalated further Kash Patel Addressed serious allegations against the Southern Poverty Law Center. He said, “In a large, sweeping indictment, the Southern Poverty Law Center is accused of fraud and using the banking system to perpetrate that fraud. I just want to talk about a few brief things here. The Southern Poverty Law Center itself advertises for a period of at least a decade to raise money to dismantle violent extremist groups. He reportedly used his donor network to raise funds to dismantle violent extremist groups.Acting Attorney General Todd Blanch also referred to charges that include fraud and money laundering. However, the SPLC has denied wrongdoing and said its whistleblower program was designed to monitor extremist activity, not support it.The clash of claims and counterclaims and online speculation continues but the story points to a bigger problem. In today’s fast-paced digital environment, allegations can spread before the facts are fully established, leaving public opinion in limbo.

great singer’s daughter Anuradha PaudwalSinger-artist Kavita Paudwal is creating her own niche by being associated with devotional music. After launching Kirtan Club, she is now taking the format forward across India with an ambitious plan of 52 shows per year – blending devotion with a high-energy, community-driven experience. The Yatra will begin in Mumbai on May 3 at 6:30 pm from Ajivasan Hall, Juhu.With over two decades of stage experience and training under Pandit Jiyalal Vasant Suresh WadkarPoetry brings both a heritage and a deep, living connection with the hymns. In an exclusive conversation with ETimes, she talks about Kirtan Club, her journey and growing up Anuradha Paudwal, and the enduring inspiration of Asha Bhosle.

Your show ‘Kirtan Club’ seems to be a very unique experience. Tell us about it. Is it a mix of classical and western?

No, it is classical music with some elements of western music. It differs in the sense that, as the name suggests, it is more traditional. These are the songs that people sing a lot during festivals—that’s the main part of it.When we say “club,” we refer to that happy, free state of mind. The idea is to sing the same traditional songs but without any restrictions – very open, very inclusive. These are songs that have been sung by generations. Everyone sings, everyone listens. We are trying to create a platform where everyone can sing and dance together.Besides, we are also very conscious about maintaining purity. It’s like a family gathering – people of all ages, someone playing guitar, someone playing drums, someone adding something new – but it still retains a certain sacredness. There is no alcohol etc. there. It is a place of joy, familiarity and togetherness.

Can spectators also participate?

Absolutely. This is not a performance in the usual sense. It is like a satsang. No one just sits back and watches – everyone participates.If one person sings “Ganpati Bappa Morya”, it is not the same as when everyone sings together. That collective energy is what we want. It’s interactive, immersive and very community-driven.We also plan to share stories about pilgrimages, festivals and traditions across India. On the same day, different festivals are celebrated in different parts of the country, each with its own songs and language.For example, Diwali has its own language and context, Makar Sankranti has its own language and context – but the essence is celebration. So we will have Krishna bhajans, Radha bhajans, Shiv mantras, mantras, Ganpati songs. We are also bringing multiple languages ​​– Gujarati Garba, Punjabi Bhajan, and more. It’s all very lively and festive.

What kind of experience do you want people to take back?

I want people to feel warm and happy. During those 90 minutes or two hours they should not think about anything else. They should just sing, dance and be present.Today people feel lonely. When you come into such an environment, you feel a sense of belonging. And when you are happy you don’t judge anyone. That’s the feeling I want people to take back.It is by invitation, but also open. The capacity of the venue is around 150 people, so we have to limit it. It is first come, first served. If people come around 4:30-5 pm, they are welcome.

How did your musical journey begin?

It started in my childhood. We used to gather every day for Aarti. During festivals, especially those 10 days, we used to wait eagerly—it would go on till 2-3 in the morning.That was my upbringing. A family that eats together, lives together, prays together, sings together – that’s how we grew up. Those are my earliest memories of kirtan.I started as a child actor. I sang for composers like Bappi Lahiri and Nadeem-Shravan. My father, Arun Paudwal, was an arranger with Bappi Da, so we were always around music. I was also taking training under Suresh ji.As a child, I got a chance to sing with Rahul Roy and Pooja Bhatt for Mahesh Bhatt’s film Junoon. I didn’t realize it was a big deal—I recorded the song and forgot about it. Months later, I found out that it was used in the film.

How did your career progress after that?

There was a gap because I was still in school. Later, in college, I did an album that became quite popular during the indie pop phase. After that I started doing live shows and playback singing.I also got offers to host reality shows like Antakshari and Sa Re Ga Ma, but I refused a show because it was clashing with my B.Com exams.After all, I worked with composers like AR Rahman. Then I got a chance to go to America.

How did it shape you?

My mother Anuradha Paudwal encouraged me. He said that once you grow up you should work and look for opportunities.I initially went for unpaid internships, even worked with the United Nations. Then I got a job as a producer and writer in a TV channel. I was already writing scripts for devotional shows in India, so it came naturally.I later completed my master’s degree at NYU. After that, I had the option to stay or come back and I decided to come back. I was very happy to be back.

Did being away affect your career in playback singing?

Yes it did. When I came back the industry had changed. Reality shows had become popular and many new singers had already become popular.If you disappear even for a few days today, people will notice. I was away for 4-5 years. People assumed I was still abroad. So yes, from Bollywood’s point of view, it made a difference.At that time, I had been gone for years. Even now, people sometimes say to me, “You were in America, right?” I say, “No, I’ve been here 15 years.”But overall, music and culture have always been a part of who I am.

Did you struggle to establish your identity, especially being Anuradha Paudwal’s daughter?

It is definitely a challenge. There are a lot of expectations when you come from a musical family. People recognize you, they respect you—but they also compare you.There is pressure. People may initially appreciate you because of your background, but that doesn’t last. If your work is good, they accept you. Otherwise, they wouldn’t do it.In fact, I think it’s more pressure than privilege. Because you have to constantly prove that you’re not just someone’s daughter – you’re your own artist. And that journey is not easy.

Does coming from a musical family make things easier in the industry?

Not necessary. This may help you get entry, but after that everything depends on your work.People may treat you with respect, but they won’t give you a job until you prove yourself. This applies everywhere—not just movies.Even in business or medicine, children grow up in the same environment, so they naturally gravitate towards it. But when you enter the real world, you still have to prove yourself.

What kind of parent was Anuradha Paudwal?

When we were little, she was quite strict – just like most parents of that generation. My father was even stricter. Parenting in those days meant first and foremost discipline, even though there was a lot of love involved.He did not express love the way people do today—like going out often or making big gestures—but he showed it in his own way. For example, she would make cakes herself, decorate them, add icing – that was her way of expressing her affection.We were not allowed to do everything freely. Sometimes school trips were refused, outings were banned. This was a normal thing for kids growing up in the 80s and 90s. There were rules – you had to study, you had to follow discipline.

What was it like growing up around his music?

A lot of my learning was completely unconscious. There is a difference between sitting down and learning something and being around it constantly.I used to listen to her riyaaz early in the morning – even in my sleep, her voice would reach me. It has a deep impact on you.As I grew up, I started to understand her artistry – how technically strong she is, how beautifully she enunciates certain lines, how precise her singing is. That appreciation came much later.

What values ​​did they instill in you while growing up?

She was a very strong and positive person. At that time, things were very different. Today, it is common for 17-year-olds to go abroad to study, but back then it was rare – especially for girls.My father was not around at that time, so she was raising me as a single parent. For him to take this decision – to send me to another country alone for 4-5 years – was incredibly courageous.She told me, “If you go and live independently, you’ll figure out what you want to do in life.” This was a big decision for a mother at that time.Because of that, I gained a level of confidence that I don’t think I would have gained otherwise. For this I will always be very grateful to him.In our family, it was always important that the child study, take up a sport and learn an art. For us, music was naturally that art because it was part of our everyday lives.There was a strong foundation of discipline, structure and values. But there was also a lot of positivity. He always maintained a very strong mentality.

What did you learn from great personalities like Asha Bhosle?

Asha Bhosle is a great inspiration. He had every reason to limit himself. She could have easily said, ‘I’m classically trained, I won’t sing certain types of songs.’ But he never did that. Whatever he sang – whether it was classical-based or something completely different – ​​he sang it beautifully. That kind of openness is very rare.I have met him, but from a distance. I said hello to him. My father Arun Paudwal was a sound arranger and had worked closely with people like Kishore Kumar, Lata ji and Asha ji. At the time, the industry was small – there were a lot of good musicians, but not very many – so everyone knew everyone else.One of the biggest things to learn from his life is that whatever happens in your personal life should not affect your performance. In fact, sometimes challenges make your performance even stronger. If someone says, ‘My condition is not good, how can I perform?’ – So you just look at his journey. This is very inspiring.She was singing even at the age of 92. That kind of passion and commitment is incredible. It’s very, very inspiring. In interviews, she used to say that she enjoys cooking for her family. Imagine – a legend of his stature finding happiness in something so simple. This is real greatness. Those people were like that.Artists like Asha ji, Lata Mangeshkar Or Mohammed Rafi never spoke publicly about his struggles or used him for sympathy. He never took advantage of difficult circumstances. Whatever challenges he faced, he focused on his art and through it reached incredible heights. Many people today highlight their struggles, but that generation did not. For me, the biggest learning is- just focus on your art and let your work speak.

Are you planning to return to playback singing?

Right now, I’m more excited about Kirtan Club because it’s deeply connected to who I am.Everything I’ve learned – my upbringing, my travels, my experiences – comes together here. For me, it’s not just about performance; It’s about creating a place where people feel happy and connected.If people go back happy even for those two hours, then that is enough for me.

The US$81 billion Warner-Paramount mega merger has received shareholder approval, sending a deal that could transform Hollywood and the broader media landscape nearing the finish line.According to preliminary vote counts Thursday, an overwhelming majority of Warner Bros. Discovery shareholders voted in favor of selling the entire business to Paramount for $31 a share, the company said. The value of this deal including debt is about $ 111 billion.Skydance-owned Paramount wants to buy Warner’s entire stake. That means cult-favorite titles like HBO Max, “Harry Potter” and even CNN may soon find themselves under the same roof as CBS, “Top Gun” and the Paramount+ streaming service. The green signal from the company’s shareholders increases the chances of this becoming a reality.But the deal still faces regulatory reviews, including from the US Justice Department. Warner said it expects to close the deal sometime in the third fiscal quarter.Paramount’s search for Warner hasn’t been easy so far. And while Warner’s board now supports the Paramount merger, it was not always eager to enter into this particular marriage.Late last year, Warner turned down Paramount’s offer to make a $72 billion studio and streaming deal with Netflix. Paramount, meanwhile, went straight to shareholders with a hostile bid to take over the entire company, including the cable business, which Netflix did not want.The three companies battled publicly for months over who had the better offer. Warner’s board repeatedly supported Netflix’s bid. But ultimately, Paramount offered more money and Netflix abruptly dropped out of the race rather than prolong the fight.That corporate drama may be over now, but the implications are still there. Thousands of actors, directors, writers and other industry professionals have expressed “categorical opposition” to the deal in a letter, arguing that further consolidation would lead to job losses and fewer choices for filmmakers and moviegoers.Some MLAs are also ringing alarm bells.“What’s at stake is clearly not just a corporate deal, but who controls the news, who controls entertainment, who controls storytelling,” Democratic Senator Cory Booker said at a “Spotlight” hearing on the merger in Washington last week. “It’s about the concentration and consolidation of cultural power.”The merger would bring together two of Hollywood’s five remaining legacy studios. It will join the two major streaming platforms – Paramount+ and HBO Max – and the two big names in America’s TV news landscape – CBS and CNN – as well as other brands and entertainment networks.Company executives argue this will be good news for consumers, saying they will have access to a larger content library, especially if HBO Max and Paramount+ become a streaming service. And Paramount CEO David Ellison has tried to reassure filmmakers with a 45-day theatrical window guarantee and a goal of releasing 30 films a year between Paramount and Warner, which he has said will remain a stand-alone operation under a combined company.“I love cinema and I love film,” Ellison said at CinemaCon last week. “You can count on our full commitment.”But the new owner will also want to cut costs. Regulatory filings have already indicated that this will include layoffs and shrinking some overlapping operations. And critics are skeptical about the consumer benefits — warning of higher prices that could arise when it comes to streaming, and potentially less variety in content down the road.Then there is the news. Since coming under Skydance ownership less than a year ago, Paramount-owned CBS has already seen significant editorial changes, most notably with the installation of Free Press founder Bari Weiss as editor-in-chief of CBS News. If the Warner acquisition goes through, many are expecting similar changes at CNN, which has long drawn the ire of President Donald Trump.Other questions of political influence have piled up. The Justice Department and the company’s leadership have said politics will play no role in the regulatory process — but Trump himself has spoken publicly several times about Warner’s future, despite what he once suggested would be his personal role. Trump also has a close relationship with the Ellison family, particularly with billionaire Oracle founder Larry Ellison, who is putting billions of dollars on the table to support his son’s company’s bid.Meanwhile, according to regulatory filings, Paramount has secured money from several sovereign investment funds – including Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund as well as funds from the United Arab Emirates and Qatar. But such investors will not have voting rights in a future Paramount-Warner combo, the filing said. Paramount has not publicly specified how much they are contributing.Other countries, including European regulators, are considering the deal – and states may also try to challenge it. California Attorney General Rob Bonta has been particularly vocal about the transaction, and said his state is investigating.

Hulk Hogan. Image via: AP

Hulk HoganHogan, whose real name was Terry Bollea, spoke in detail about the most difficult period of his life in his final recorded interview, which was released posthumously in the Netflix documentary Hulk Hogan: Real American. Hogan died in July 2025 at the age of 71 from an acute myocardial infarction, commonly known as a heart attack. The four-part series, completed before his death, follows his life and career and focuses closely on 2009, when he returned to wrestling while battling severe pain, heavy fentanyl use, and the aftereffects of his divorce.

Return to wrestling and drug use levels

Hogan’s narrative focuses on his decision to return to wrestling with Total Nonstop Action Wrestling (TNA), at a time when his body was under stress from years in the ring. He described taking fentanyl in multiple forms at the same time to manage pain from repeated surgeries. “Taking 80 milligrams of fentanyl at two in the morning, stuffing them under my gums…” He said, before detailing the extensive routine: “I had two 300-milligram patches of fentanyl on my legs and they gave me six 1500-milligram fentanyl lollipops to eat.” He recalled a pharmacist’s reaction when he picked up his prescription: “I went into the pharmacy, she said, ‘You should be dead. We’ve never seen a human being take that much fentanyl.'” In the same interview, Hogan said doctors told him straight out that the level he was taking was higher than any he’d ever seen, adding, “I just had so much in my body.”

Injuries and day-to-day situation

The physical conditions behind that dependence run through the chain. Hogan points to multiple back surgeries that left him in constant pain and unable to function normally. “I had to sleep on a chair, and if I moved my finger like that, my whole back would go into spasms and twists,” he said, describing how even small movements would cause severe pain. Eric Bischoff, who worked closely with Hogan and arranged for his move to TNA, described what he looked like during filming and appearances: “I would literally have to go to his hotel and help him get out of bed and get in the shower so he could get ready to go shoot.”

Jeremy Borash, who was involved in the production at the time, said that Hogan was initially expected to appear regularly on screen, but “it became clear very quickly that he was not ready to do that.”

Divorce, Finance and Withdrawal Decision

The timing of Hogan’s return is directly tied to his high-profile divorce from Linda Hogan after 24 years of marriage. He said he had performed “extremely well” after giving them “70 percent” of his net worth. “I gave everything I had to get rid of him,” he said, adding that he was “devastated.”

Hulk Hogan and Linda Hogan. (Image: via Getty Images)

Bischoff, who negotiated the TNA deal, explained the situation surrounding that decision: “Hulk was reluctant to go, but he needed the money.” He also described the broader circumstances Hogan was dealing with at the time: “Your wife is divorcing you, your doctor is giving you a handful of pills that will kill a horse, and you’re chasing it down with a quart of vodka a day.”

substance use beyond pain management

The documentary also addresses Hogan’s long-term issues with drug use beyond fentanyl.Friends and family spoke about his steroid use during the 1980s and 1990s, as well as his long-term alcohol abuse.Bischoff’s description of that period included both, describing a cycle where Hogan was dealing with prescription drugs along with heavy drinking.

Mental health and lowest points

Hogan also spoke openly about his mental state after his divorce, including a time when he contemplated suicide.“I went home, I started drinking and taking pills, and I just went down this rabbit hole for a few days,” he said. “The next thing I know, I’m sitting in front of my bathroom with a gun in my mouth and don’t know what I’m doing, you know?” Bischoff, reflecting on that period as someone who was in regular contact with him, said: “He was down, he was hurting.”

Family and later life

Following Hogan’s death, Linda Hogan, his ex-wife and mother of his two children, Brooke and Nick, shared a statement on Instagram reflecting on his passing. She said the “end result” of his loss was “shocking”, adding: “We spent every minute together for many years. I’ve known him since he was 28! … It’s so sad. I love you Hulkster. You were my man. The only man for me.” At the time of his death, Hogan was married to his third wife, Sky Daly, whom he married in 2023. He previously divorced Jennifer McDaniel in 2021.

final account

The series brings together Hogan’s own accounts with those who worked closely with him during that period, showing how injury, medication, financial pressures and personal stress all existed together during his final years in and around wrestling.

veteran actor Anupam Kher He has never shied away from speaking about his humble beginnings, and his recent revelations about selling his Mumbai apartment reflect the same philosophy. The actor who once sold his property, which he later bought Alia BhattNow she has opened up about why she deliberately decided not to own a house at one point in her life.Recalling his initial struggles during an appearance on Zindagi with Richa, Anupam shared that he had reached Mumbai with just Rs 37 in his pocket. Despite building a successful career over the years, he said that his decisions were never driven solely by financial goals.

‘It was a conscious decision, not a compulsion’

Opening up about selling his house almost a decade ago, Anupam revealed that the move was deliberate and rooted in a desire for simplicity rather than necessity.Referring to his wife, he said, “Kiran and I moved to a different place, and it took us four years to find it. Then she became an MP and moved to Chandigarh. At one point I wondered why we were trying so hard for a house. So we just started living simply.” Kirron Kher.He said living in a rented space feels more grounded and less complicated, allowing him to focus on what really matters – his art. He reiterated, “My goal is not just money. I want to be the best actor I can be.”

A mother’s dream came true

While he chose simplicity for himself, Anupam made sure to fulfill his mother’s wish of buying a house in Shimla. He told that he had always dreamed of a simple house, but he went one step further and bought a huge property for them.Interestingly, despite all this grandeur, she prefers a simple lifestyle and comes home mainly during summers.