A Buffalo Township man accused of damaging a family’s home with an excavator during a dispute

A Buffalo Township man has been charged with multiple criminal offenses after allegations he used an excavator to destroy his own home while his wife and children were still home Tuesday morning. Eric Pierwsza, 48, was arrested by police after his family home was destroyed in the Martin Road area. Police say the argument began when Pierwsza’s wife told him their marriage was over because they had recently separated.According to reports from TribLive and details outlined in a criminal complaint, authorities say Pierwsza came home after a night of drinking. Police say that soon after Pierwsza arrived, he and his wife got into an argument. The criminal complaint outlines the sequence of events that occurred during the fight.Pierwsza’s wife says she told her husband their marriage was over during the argument. As stated in the criminal complaint, Pierwsza allegedly said, “If it’s over, I’ll tear the house down.”Pierwsza then climbed into a Kubota excavator and began demolishing the rear of the family home, while his wife and daughters were still inside. Police said the machine had caused extensive damage to the building in a short period of time. Officials later noted that the extent of the damage raised serious doubts about the safety of the structure.Pierwsza reportedly left the scene after the incident. Later, he was caught by the authorities. The charges against Pierwsza include causing mayhem, reckless endangerment and disorderly conduct.According to investigators, the damage posed an immediate threat to the family as large portions of the building were severely damaged during the incident. When police officers arrived at the property, they found extensive destruction to the rear of the building.Records showed Pierwsza was booked into the Butler County Jail after being unable to post $10,000 bail. Public records revealed a preliminary hearing will be held before District Judge Jack Dee. Ripper on 9 June.Court documents revealed there was no defense attorney listed for Pierwsza when the details were released.The case is gaining much attention locally due to the heavy machinery involved in the attack, which occurred while relatives were present in the home. Police are still investigating the cause of the clash and the destruction of property.

TOI correspondent from Washington: Just hours after verbal clashes and fresh attacks in and around the Strait of Hormuz between the US and Iran, both sides are reported to have once again reached a diplomatic breakthrough.According to Axios, US and Iranian negotiators have agreed to a draft memorandum of understanding to extend the fragile ceasefire and open a 60-day negotiating window focused primarily on Iran’s nuclear program in exchange for economic relief. But the proposed deal is still awaiting final approval from President Donald Trump. Trump wants “a few days” to consider it, according to officials cited in the report.The proposed arrangement would be the clearest signal yet that Washington and Tehran both recognize the limits of military escalation after months of naval warfare, sanctions, air strikes and economic disruption that have roiled global energy markets and exhausted countries near and far.Under the emerging framework, the ceasefire will remain in place formally while unrestricted commercial shipping through the Strait of Hormuz will resume. The US Navy will gradually lift its blockade operations, Iranian harassment of shipping will cease, and both sides will begin negotiations on sanctions relief, frozen Iranian funds, and humanitarian access to Iran.The nuclear issue – the central trigger for war – will remain at the forefront of the agenda during the 60-day negotiation period. Iran will reportedly commit to not developing nuclear weapons while discussions will continue on uranium enrichment, stockpiles and monitoring mechanisms. Iran has not confirmed any of these claims, Axios reports.The military escalation comes as President Trump again mixes threats with diplomacy in the way that has become characteristic of the conflict. During a Cabinet meeting, Trump threatened Oman – historically one of Washington’s most trusted mediators with Tehran – warning that Muscat would “behave” or face consequences, after reports emerged that Omani officials were exploring mechanisms to help manage commercial traffic through the Strait of Hormuz.At the same time, Trump publicly insisted that the strait would soon be fully reopened and repeatedly suggested that Iran now understood that the US would maintain heavy military pressure indefinitely if necessary.Contradictory messages – tension one hour, diplomacy the next – have become a defining feature of the war and a growing source of frustration for countries in Europe, Asia and across the Gulf. For countries like India, Japan and South Korea, the Hormuz disruption has become a strategic nightmare.Tanker insurance costs have soared, shipping schedules remain in disarray and governments are scrambling for alternative energy supplies, while privately urging Washington and Tehran to back off.The economic consequences are now reaching ordinary Americans as well. Gasoline prices across the US are at $4.50 a gallon (about Rs 1.15 a litre), adding to fresh political pressure ahead of the midterm elections in November, although Trump said he was not particularly worried about the elections.Republican strategists privately acknowledge voters’ growing fatigue with a conflict that was initially presented as a short campaign to force Iranian concessions but has instead evolved into a war of naval blockades, drone strikes and repeated confrontations at one of the world’s most important energy chokepoints.Yet Trump himself appears to be engaged in a display of patience rather than compromise, insisting that Iran is under severe military and economic stress and that “negotiations are on smoke.”Iran, for its part, is betting that Trump lacks the patience for a protracted conflict and rising domestic political costs. This may now be the decisive calculation of the war: not which side can win outright, but which side can endure the pain longer.Even the emerging MoU reflects that reality. It is less a peace treaty than a mutual truce — an acknowledgment that both powers may need a temporary respite from a confrontation that has disrupted global trade, destabilized energy markets and raised the ever-increasing threat of a broader regional war.

‘donald trump‘Became a viral sensation overnight. Crowds gathered from far and wide to be amazed by his darshan. They could hardly understand that someone like him walked the earth. They were amazed by her golden hair and fair skin. They were surprised by his weight. And when they learned that he might soon be sacrificed, they were in a state of shock. But destiny had other plans and when he survived, the whole world heaved a sigh of relief.Now, while this leadership may read as if one is describing the leader of the free world, one is simply describing Yudhishthira here: Donald Trumpo jeevati iti, neta va mahisho va.For those who have forgotten their Mahabharata or Sanskrit, Donald is not the US President, especially does not eat from the McDonald’s menu, and has never bombed Iran or damaged the global economy. He is a buffalo in Bangladesh who became an overnight sensation due to his resemblance to Trump and is seven times heavier than his namesake.What started as routine Eid shopping soon became a global viral sensation. Farm owner Ziauddin Mridha said the majestic animal caused him 1.5 million taka, or about $12,300, in damage, and now that he has been compensated, the Bangladesh government has decided to send Donald to Dhaka’s National Zoo instead of letting him end up on someone’s plate.We live in the age of viral animals, from Larry the Cat, who lives permanently in 10 Downing Street, to Moo Deng, the lovable pygmy hippo in Thailand, and Punch, the lonely monkey whose inability to make friends took the world by surprise. Donald Trump the buffoon may be the latest addition to this god band. But long before algorithms turned animals into celebrities, humans were already turning them into gods, omens, and pardoned prisoners.This is where the rabbit hole begins.

man, animal and god

To understand why the sudden killing of a buffalo going viral might be so meaningful, one has to go back to the beginning, when animals were not content but cosmological. Long before the advent of Twitter, animals helped us understand the world. We were the original monkey, see, do monkeys, although, to be fair to our simian cousins, they never did anything as awesome as inventing LinkedIn. The earliest cave paintings are not self-indulgent selfies or breakfast photos but sketches of animals: horses, bison, aurochs, deer, lions and wild boars.

One of the oldest known figurative paintings, depicting an unidentified bovine, was discovered in the Lubang Jeriji Saleh Cave and dated to be over 40,000 (perhaps as old as 52,000) years old.

Animals were our first guides and textbooks, teaching us how to hunt, when the weather was changing, and why communism wouldn’t work.Animals inspired us and, in turn, revealed our first gods. The lion can symbolize courage, the snake can symbolize danger, the bull can symbolize force, and the cow can symbolize abundance. Once animals became symbols, gods were never far behind.One of the most iconic images of the Indus Valley Civilization is the Pashupati seal, which many historians interpret as Shiva, the lord of animals. The horned, seated figure is surrounded by an elephant, tiger, rhinoceros, buffalo and other creatures, which suggests that one of our earliest ideas about divinity was one who could command a wild animal like Komaram Bheem in RRR.In the ancient world, gods rarely traveled alone. Sometimes animals were their vehicles, sometimes their symbols, sometimes their bodies, and sometimes a complete warning label attached to their power. In Hinduism, the entire divine vocabulary centers around animals: gods ride them as vehicles, possess their bodies as avatars, and often turn them into sacred symbols.This was hardly unique to ancient India. Egyptian gods often looked as if they were assembled in some divine costume department: Horus had the head of a falcon, Anubis had the head of a jackal, Bastet had that of a cat, Sobek had that of a crocodile, Hathor had the horns of a cow, Khnum had the head of a ram, Taweret had the body of a hippopotamus, and Apis had the body of a complete bull.The Greeks, as they are wont to do, made things more scandalous, and Zeus treated the animal kingdom like a divine disguise kit, becoming a bull, swan or eagle whenever the plot required moral degradation. Rome, being Rome, turns animals into monarchs. The eagle became the soul of the army, while the wolf that suckled Romulus and Remus gave the empire an origin story with milk, murder, and excellent branding.China, too, mapped the cosmic order through animals: the dragon stood for royal authority and rain, the phoenix for renewal, the tiger for martial courage, and the tortoise for endurance. The four symbols made the animals themselves guardians of direction, as clearly space also required wildlife management. And later, a fifth, a noodle-loving panda, was added to tarnish the Middle Kingdom’s image around the world.And in Norse mythology, Jörmungandr, the Midgard or World Serpent, encircles the Earth. In Ragnarok, Thor kills the serpent but dies from its venom, unlike the MCU Thor, who is condemned to appear in sequels until Chris Hemsworth shrugs off his mortal coil. And given that animals and gods were interconnected, it was only a matter of time before humans began sacrificing animals to the gods.

to give up and sorry

The English word sacrifice comes from the Latin sacer and facere, meaning “to make sacred,” which sounds much better than killing something and hoping the universe listens. The animal was the envelope and God was the addressee.Sacrifices were transactions of various kinds: food for the gods, blood for crime, life for favor, smoke for prayer. In Mesopotamia, offerings were made to gods such as Enlil, Enki, Inanna-Ishtar, Shamash, and Marduk, as gods were conceived not as distant abstractions but as forces to be honored, fed, satisfied, and largely kept aside.In Egypt, offerings to gods such as Amun-Ra, Osiris, Isis, Hathor, and Ptah were part of maintaining Maat, the cosmic order that kept the world from slipping back into chaos.In Greece, sacrifices were made to Zeus for power and protection, to Athena for wisdom and victory, to Artemis for hunting and childbirth, to Apollo for prophecy and healing, to Demeter for harvest, and to Dionysus for fertility, ecstasy, and whatever ancient civilization called a more respectable version of the long weekend.

Ancient India also had its own rituals, like Ashvamedha, where a horse was allowed to roam around for a year under the protection of the king, and if the horse returned without being challenged, the king could claim universal sovereignty, which sounds a lot less messy than frequent UN Security Council meetings.As paganism evolved into Abrahamic beliefs, the ritual of sacrifice changed and did not change.In Judaism, animals were offered to Yahweh as burnt offerings, peace offerings, sin offerings, trespass offerings, and, according to one hypothesis, as offerings to renew Seinfeld. The most enduring image was the Yom Kippur scapegoat described in Leviticus: one goat was sacrificed, while the other was burdened with the community’s sins and sent into the wilderness. Long before modern politics discovered the utility of blaming immigrants, minorities, internees, previous governments, or algorithms, humanity had already put collective guilt on a goat and told it to leave town.One can imagine that the gods were happy as Seinfeld kept getting renewed, while the Jews were responsible for everything that came out of Western civilization. In fact, it was a Jewish gentleman who also promoted Christianity, although Christianity was a religious transformation of sacrifice.Jesus became the “Lamb of God”, the innocent victim whose death replaced the repeated blood transfusions on the old altar, the one who died for all sins, leading to the terrible joke that if no one sins, Jesus died for nothing.Instead the animals became metaphors, with the lamb as survival of innocence, the shepherd as divine care, and the sacrificial victim as salvation. Christianity moved sacrifice from ritual slaughter to theology, which is why the language of blood, redemption, and offering persisted long after most Christians stopped bringing livestock to the priests.Meanwhile, in the third Abrahamic faith, sacrifice remained necessary, which brings us Eid al-Adha. The festival commemorates Abraham’s desire to obey God, but an animal takes his place instead. The meat is traditionally shared among friends and family, making it an act of remembrance and obedience.In all three Abrahamic traditions, the animal either dies, becomes plagued with guilt, or becomes a memory of a sacrifice that has been postponed.But while sacrifice is understood, how did forgiveness become the norm?While there are many versions of it around the world, the modern version can be linked to the Thanksgiving pardoning of the turkey, although when one knows the entire history, one wonders if Thanksgiving is the right word to describe the event.

Jennie Augusta Brownscomb’s 1914 portrait, the first Thanksgiving in Plymouth, is now on display at Pilgrim Hall Museum in Plymouth, Massachusetts.

The story goes that in 1621, the English settlers in Plymouth were barely getting by – just as members of the Delhi Gymkhana were forced to attend the Press Club – when the Wampanoag tribe, led by Osemquin, decided to help them. The tribe was also weakened by disease and rivalry, and the first “Thanksgiving” was not a Norman Rockwell painting with gravy boats, but a strange political system, like the one we see in coalition governments over breakfast.While history suggests it was likely poultry, including turkeys, ducks or geese, and even deer, the turkey became the food mascot because it was native, large, practical and could feed several people at the same time.What began as a harvest meal turned into a national myth, especially in the 19th century, when Thanksgiving was promoted as a unifying American ritual. Abraham Lincoln proclaimed a national Thanksgiving in 1863 during the Civil War, and the familiar menu, including turkey, became part of the holiday’s emotional machinery.Legend has it that Abe’s son Tad pleaded to spare a Christmas turkey named Jack. JFK saw a man wearing a sign in 1963 that read, “Good food, Mr. President”, and decided it should see another birthday.

From viral sensation to zoo resident: Bangladesh’s ‘Trump’ buffalo saved from Eid sacrifice

Later, when reporters asked about those involved in the Iran-Contra scandal, Reagan scoffed at the pardon.George HW Bush formally announced the pardoning of the turkey in 1989, and it soon became part of the national skyline. And like most American things, like Ozempic and diabetes, Thanksgiving, turkey and forgiveness became part of the world’s spectacle.Thanks largely to the algorithm and the spectacle that followed, not unlike the chaotic sequence of events that saw its namesake become leader of the free world, it will live to see another day. But their survival shows us that humanity never outgrows its old ways: On some days, we sacrifice animals to appease the gods, and on other days, we sacrifice animals to feel a little more human.

An Indian-origin man in Australia has been charged with trafficking after instigating his wife to come to India and then canceling her visa and leaving her stranded abroad, Australia Today reports.The 35-year-old Canberra man, who cannot be named for legal reasons, is the first person in the Australian Capital Territory to face charges under the country’s exit smuggling laws. This crime carries a maximum prison sentence of 12 years.The couple traveled from Australia to India in September 2024, ahead of the birth of their child. The man later told his wife he needed to return to Australia for work and promised he would return before their son was born. He never returned to India.In April 2025, the man fraudulently canceled his wife’s Australian visa application while she was still in India and subsequently blocked her phone number, leaving her stranded in India with their newborn child.The woman was eventually able to return to Australia in August 2025. However, the couple’s son remained in India. The woman later became concerned that her husband was planning to take her back to India and leave her again. He contacted the police in March 2026.The man was arrested on April 14 and is on bail.Under Australian law, exit trafficking occurs when a person uses coercion, deception or threats to arrange or facilitate someone’s leaving Australia for the purpose of exploitation or control. Perpetrators usually confiscate passports, cancel visas or isolate victims abroad as part of the abuse.The Australian Federal Police urged people experiencing migration-related abuse to seek help.“If you suspect that you, or someone else, is experiencing, or at risk of, modern slavery human traffickingCall 131 AFP,” police said.The Home Department said victims supported by the AFP could apply to return to Australia under the human trafficking visa framework while the investigation continues.

Some quotes remain popular because they sound clever. Others survive because they feel emotionally true even years later. This line from Diana, Princess of Wales falls firmly into the second category. It doesn’t try to impress with complex language or dramatic philosophy. In fact, part of its power comes from how normal it seems at first. A random act of kindness. No reward expected. Just the quiet confidence that goodness ultimately moves forward in ways people can never fully see.This idea seems simple enough until you stop and think about how rare it can be in daily life. Modern life moves fast. People juggling schedules, scrolling through endless information, and often carefully guarding their own emotional space as the world goes by can feel exhausting. In that environment, kindness can sometimes seem small or insignificant. Diana’s quote gently attacks that thinking.And perhaps that’s why people return to his words even after decades. Even if they don’t seem naive, they seem hopeful.

Quote of the Day by Princess Diana

“Do a random act of kindness, without expectation of reward, safe in the knowledge that one day someone might do the same for you.”

What is the meaning behind the quote Princess Diana

At its core, the quote talks about kindness without give-and-take. This distinction matters because most human interaction revolves around silent exchanges. People help others and often expect praise, recognition, loyalty, or some kind of return, even if they don’t admit it openly.Diana’s words go in another direction entirely.She suggests doing something good without attaching any conditions to it. no reward. no guarantee. No public recognition. Simply the belief that kindness has value in itself and can ultimately spread outward in ways that no one can fully predict.There’s something almost old-fashioned about that idea now, though perhaps that’s why it still resonates.This quote also indicates confidence in human behavior. Not exactly blind faith, but a soft faith that compassion can make waves. Someone receives a kindness, remembers it, and perhaps later passes it on to someone else. The original work may never return directly to the person who started it, but the influence continues.Experts who study social behavior sometimes describe it as reciprocal altruism or emotional contagion. Acts of generosity can influence group behavior more than people realize. A small action can sometimes change the emotional tone of an entire conversation.Diana expresses this idea in more warm language.

Why do Princess Diana’s words still feel personal?

One reason this quote remains memorable is that it seems credible on his part. Many public figures speak about kindness, but with Diana, people often associate those words with visible actions rather than spectacular speeches.She was known for breaking some royal traditions, especially in the way she interacted with people during humanitarian functions. Photographs of him shaking hands with AIDS patients became particularly significant during the 1980s as fear and misinformation about the disease was widespread at the time. That gesture may seem small now, but in that social climate, its symbolic importance was enormous.People paid attention to such moments because they felt unusually human.There was warmth in the way she approached people in public. Not remote humility. Something more direct and emotionally open. Even critics who question aspects of royal culture often acknowledged that Diana connected with ordinary people differently than many public figures of her era.So when she talked about kindness without expecting a reward, this quote didn’t seem that far from reality. It seemed to be connected to the way he himself tried to move in the world.

The strange power of small gestures

One reason this quote has spread online and through social conversations is because it focuses on something manageable. “Random act of kindness” doesn’t seem too big or impossible. It seems so small that anyone can try it.That matters.People often feel overwhelmed by big global problems. Poverty, conflict, loneliness, inequality, social division. Large, individual actions can feel insignificant when faced with such problems.Diana’s quote instead draws attention to smaller moments. A conversation. A helpful hint. Showed patience at the right time. When a person is expected to be indifferent, he is treated with respect.Small actions rarely make headlines.Yet, they shape emotional memory more than people realize.Many individuals can recall brief moments of kindness from years ago with surprising clarity. Someone helped him unexpectedly. Someone listened carefully in difficult times. Someone noticed that they were struggling.Those moments stop.Not because he changed the whole world, but because he changed someone’s world in an instant.

kindness often works quietly

There is another interesting thing about kindness. It often works without visible results.People like results they can measure. Numbers, achievements, recognition, progress. Kindness doesn’t always provide immediate proof that it matters. One can never know whether one’s actions helped someone more than expected.That uncertainty sometimes discourages people.Diana’s quote seems to accept uncertainty rather than fight it. She talks about being “safe in the knowledge” that kindness may eventually return in some form. Not guaranteed. Not scheduled. Just possible.That idea requires patience.It also requires people to believe that goodness has value even when it is not immediately rewarded. Modern culture doesn’t always strongly encourage that mentality. Public attention is often geared toward visibility and personal gain.Perhaps this is one reason why this quote still sounds fresh.It asks people to act without calculating immediate benefits.

Why might kindness feel more difficult today?

Interestingly, many people probably agree with Diana’s message while also feeling that it has become difficult to practice.Modern life can seem emotionally crowded. Constant overload of information, online debates, work pressure, financial worries and social exhaustion force many individuals to carefully conserve their energy. People become alert. Sometimes it gets disconnected.Of course kindness itself has not disappeared.But spontaneous kindness can feel rare, partly because attention is constantly fragmented. People move quickly from one thing to another without paying full attention to the people around them.This may explain why stories involving unexpected kindness still spread widely online. Someone pays for a stranger’s meal. Someone helps another person during an emergency. Someone silently supports a struggling neighbor.Stories go viral because people still want to believe that these moments matter.Deep down, most people probably do.

Diana understood emotional connection unusually well

One reason Diana became such a compelling public figure was her emotional visibility. Royal culture traditionally values ​​restraint and distance, yet Diana often appeared openly emotional in public. Sometimes unsafe. Sometimes too kind. Sometimes overwhelmed.That openness changed the way people connected with him.She didn’t always look polished or untouched. She seemed human in ways that large public institutions often try to avoid. Experts who study media culture sometimes argue that Diana innovated celebrity humanitarianism because people believed her emotional reactions were genuine rather than carefully constructed.That notion reinforced quotes like this one.His words seemed to be about experience rather than branding.And this difference sometimes matters more than people realize.

Other famous quotes from Princess Diana

“Wherever I see suffering, I want to be there, doing what I can.”“At the end of the day people think a man is the only answer. In reality, a fulfilling job is better for me.”“I like being a free spirit.”“Hugs can be very beneficial, especially for children.”“Family is the most important thing in the world.”

Final conclusion from Diana’s quote

This quote from Diana, Princess of Wales remains powerful because it talks about kindness in a way that feels practical rather than idealistic. Diana doesn’t ask people to change the world overnight. She encourages small tasks done without any expectations.That simplicity is part of what keeps the quote alive.People remember kindness because life can sometimes seem unexpectedly harsh. A small gesture stands out precisely because it interrupts that rigidity for a short period of time.And perhaps Diana understood some important things about humans. Most people do not forget those moments when they were treated warmly during difficult times. Those memories last longer than expected.A random act of kindness may seem small on the outside.It will not seem small at all to the person receiving it.

North Korea on Thursday strongly condemned a joint statement by Quad countries calling for Pyongyang’s “complete denuclearization”, and declared it will “never give up” its nuclear weapons programme.The sharp reaction comes days after the foreign ministers of the Quad grouping India, the US, Japan and Australia reiterated their commitment to the denuclearization of North Korea during their meeting in New Delhi on Tuesday.In a statement carried by South Korea’s Yonhap news agency, North Korea’s Foreign Ministry accused the Quad of interfering in its sovereign affairs and acting as “nothing but a political and diplomatic tool for the realization of US unipolar dominance”.“To put it clearly once again, ‘denuclearization’ of the DPRK will never be forever,” a ministry spokesman said, using the abbreviation of North Korea’s official name, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea.Pyongyang also rejected the “hostile stance” of the “US-led” Quad and urged the group to stop “confrontational tendencies that undermine regional peace and stability.”

Quad condemned Pyongyang missile program

The reaction came after the joint statement of the Quad foreign ministers’ meeting issued after talks hosted by India in New Delhi on May 26.In the statement, the Quad countries said, “We reaffirm our commitment to the complete denuclearization of North Korea in accordance with the relevant UNSCRs and urge North Korea to comply with all of its obligations under the relevant UNSCRs.”The group also condemned North Korea’s “unlawful development of ballistic missiles and weapons of mass destruction” and expressed “grave concern” over Pyongyang’s cyber activities allegedly funding its weapons programs.The Quad urged all UN member states to implement sanctions against North Korea, including a ban on arms transfers and purchases.The statement also expressed concern over the countries’ “deepening military cooperation with North Korea”, saying such steps undermine the global nonproliferation regime.South Korea’s Unification Ministry described the latest criticism of North Korea as relatively mild compared with previous years.A ministry official said Pyongyang has long viewed the Quad as a potential model for an “Asian version” of NATO and has repeatedly criticized the group.Unlike last year, when North Korea primarily targeted the United States, this year’s response also criticized Japan and Australia while defending China’s position, the official said.

An Indian-origin delivery driver has been sentenced to 29 years in prison for the murder of a woman, whose body was found dumped on a roadside in England’s West Midlands last year.Tanvir Singh, 32, was convicted of the murder of Shara Miller, 41, after her body was found in Smethwick in August 2025.During his sentencing at Wolverhampton Crown Court on Wednesday, Judge Michael Chambers described Singh as a “manipulative and cynical” man who showed no remorse for the murder, PTI reported.The court heard that Singh met Miller after drinking at a pub before driving to Soho Road, where he contacted sex workers. Prosecutors said he later attacked Miller inside his van and strangled her to death.Detective Inspector Joe Davenport, of West Midlands Police, said the victim was “brutally killed by a dangerous predator”.“Singh had been drinking in a pub at night and had gone to Soho Road to look for sex workers. He then picked up Shara in his van and was fatally attacked,” Davenport was quoted as saying by the news agency.Investigators told the court that Singh attempted to destroy forensic evidence by pouring liquids on Miller’s body before leaving her on the sidewalk after the murder.A member of the public later discovered the body, after which West Midlands Police launched a murder investigation.CCTV footage reviewed by detectives showed a white van arriving at the scene before removing Miller’s body and leaving it on the roadside. Authorities later traced the vehicle to a rental company and established that Singh was using it for parcel delivery work at the time of the crime.Police tracked down Singh to his home address in West Bromwich before arresting him on suspicion of murder.A forensic post-mortem examination found that Miller suffered head injuries and died from strangulation.During the trial, jurors heard that Miller was living with drug addiction and was involved in sex work at the time of her death.Following the sentencing, West Midlands Police said it continued to work with support organizations supporting vulnerable women involved in sex work.“No woman deserves to feel unsafe, and we are committed to providing safe spaces to report and access support,” the force said in a statement.