Florida man fools elderly woman into giving him $600,000 in gold through ‘Phantom Hacker’ scheme

Florida man fools elderly woman into giving him $600,000 in gold through 'Phantom Hacker' scheme

A Florida man has been arrested in Arizona after allegedly traveling to collect hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of gold from an elderly woman implicated in the so-called “Phantom Hacker” fraud scheme.Gary Christopher, 59, of Port St. Lucie, Florida, was taken into custody on April 10 after he allegedly arrived at the victim’s Phoenix-area home to take approximately $600,000 worth of gold bullion. He has been charged with conspiracy to commit money laundering and made his first appearance in federal court on April 13.Christopher worked as a courier in a major scam targeting an elderly woman. Fraudsters contacted her, pretending to have stolen her identity and falsely claiming she needed to secure her money.One of the scammers even impersonated a former US Attorney and instructed him to convert his savings into gold and hand it over for “safekeeping”. Over time, more than $400,000 in assets were transferred before the victim realized she had been defrauded.Christopher’s role came in the final stages of planning. Prosecutors say he traveled to Arizona on April 9 to pick up additional deliveries of gold from the woman. However, law enforcement officials were already monitoring the situation and stopped him when he arrived at the property.Investigators later found evidence that Christopher was given detailed instructions on how to collect the gold and transfer it to other members of the group.Authorities say the case is part of a growing trend of “phantom hacker” scams, where criminals impersonate government officials or technical support agents to trick victims, often elderly people, into handing over money or valuables. Typically, genuine government agencies will never ask people to withdraw cash, buy gold, or hand over valuables to a courier sent to their home.The investigation into Christopher continues as authorities continue to locate other suspects involved in the scheme.

Source link

What is Joe Rogan doing in the White House? Trump invites podcaster and calls him ‘liberal’

What is Joe Rogan doing in the White House? Trump invites podcaster and calls him 'liberal'

Joe Rogan’s appearance at the White House with Donald Trump has raised eyebrows, after the MAGA podcast host joined the president during the signing of an executive order focused on psychedelic drug research for mental health treatments.Rogan was in the Oval Office right behind POTUS on Saturday when Trump signed a measure aimed at accelerating research and regulatory approval for certain psychedelic-based treatments, particularly those being studied for conditions such as depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder in veterans.“Today’s order will ensure that people suffering from debilitating symptoms finally have the chance to reclaim their lives and live happier lives,” Trump said.The order directs the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to accelerate its review process for treatments that are already in advanced clinical trials. This also includes drugs, such as psychedelics, which are being studied for mental health care.Trump talked about ibogaine, a psychedelic substance used in some countries for PTSD treatment, and said the administration would explore expanding access through the Right to Try Act, which allows terminally ill patients access to experimental treatments that are still under review.Joe Rogan has previously criticized Trump on foreign policy decisions and said the initiative began after he shared information about psychedelic treatments with the president.“I sent him that information. The text message that came back: ‘Sounds great. Do you want FDA approval? Let’s do it.’ Really that quickly,” Rogan said at the White House.Rogan also explained how the discussion began through his podcast, where psychedelic therapy has often been a topic.Also present at the event were FDA Commissioner Martin Macri, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and CMS Administrator Mehmet Oz.“Under this new program in this administration, drugs can be approved in a matter of weeks, not a year or more, if they align with our national priorities,” Macri said.During the event, Trump also joked while responding to the discussion about mental health treatment.“can I have some please?” He said, “I’ll do whatever it takes… I don’t need to be sad. If you’re busy enough, maybe this will work, that’s what I do.”Rogan’s appearance comes as he has also been openly critical of Trump’s foreign policy, including recent military actions in Iran. Despite this, Trump described him as “a little more liberal”, but said he still respected him.Trump said, “We all respect Joe. He’s a little more liberal than me and that’s OK.”

Source link

British man pleads guilty in US hacking case that stole more than $8 million in virtual currency. world News

UK man pleads guilty in US hacking case involving theft of more than $8 million in virtual currency
Tyler Buchanan admitted to targeting 12 companies using SMS phishing to steal more than $8 million in virtual currency.

A British man has pleaded guilty in the United States for his role in a cybercrime scheme that targeted at least 12 companies and stole at least $8 million in virtual currency. US Department of Justice (DOJ).Tyler Buchanan, 24, of Dundee, Scotland, admitted being part of a group that targeted companies and individuals through text message scams known as SMS phishing.Officials said the group sent hundreds of fake messages to employees, prompting them to click on links and enter sensitive information such as login details. These details were used to access company systems and steal confidential data.According to the DOJ, the group carried out the attacks between September 2021 and April 2023, targeting sectors including technology, telecommunications and virtual currency firms.“The conspirators created a phishing kit that captured login credentials entered into fraudulent phishing websites by victim company employees,” the DOJ said. It said the stolen information was shared through online channels controlled by Buchanan and his associates.Investigators also found evidence at Buchanan’s home in Scotland. A digital device contained files containing cryptocurrency access details, including victims’ names and addresses, as well as seed phrases used to control digital assets.Authorities said the scheme resulted in the theft of at least $8 million worth of cryptocurrency from victims across the United States.Buchanan pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit wire fraud and aggravated identity theft. He is in US federal custody through April 2025.He is scheduled to be sentenced on Aug. 21 and could face up to 22 years in prison.This case is part of a wider investigation into the cyber crime network. The DOJ said Buchanan was associated with a group engaged in similar activities, with other individuals also charged.The FBI continues its investigation, while several co-accused individuals face ongoing legal proceedings in the US.

Source link

Indian-origin politician calls out racism against Indian-Australians: ‘We can overcome this hatred…’

Indian-origin politician calls out racism against Indian-Australians: 'We can overcome this hatred...'

An Indian-origin leader in Melbourne has condemned politicians’ silence on racism targeting Indian Australians, saying the issue is one of dignity, safety and equal respect.Melbourne’s Deputy Lord Mayor and Liberal Party politician Roshenna Campbell said there were clear differences in how different communities were treated when they faced abuse.He said in an interview with Australia Today: “When other communities are targeted, we see politicians protesting against it. Why is it that there is silence among politicians when Indian Australians face racism? I am horrified by racist comments targeting the Indian Australian community. We can overcome this hatred only by standing with Indian Australians. Every politician must see this hatred and racism for what it is. It’s not just about representation. It is about dignity, safety and the right of every community to feel seen and respected. “The response to racism is up to all of us as Australians.”Campbell made this comment in an interview, where he stressed that racism against Indian Australians should not be ignored or treated differently.He said that when a community is targeted, political leaders have a responsibility to respond proactively and argued that unity is important to overcome hatred.Campbell currently serves as the Deputy Lord Mayor of Melbourne and is also a member of the Liberal Party. She previously contested a federal election and has a background as a barrister.Coming from an immigrant family of Indian origin, she has often spoken about representation and inclusion in Australian public life. His comments add to the ongoing debate about political responses to racism, multiculturalism and discrimination in Australia.He said that the responsibility to combat racism does not lie with one group alone, but with the entire society.

Source link

Kash Patel’s ‘erratic’ habits raise concerns as FBI director’s late-night drinking delays meetings: Report

Kash Patel's 'erratic' habits raise concerns as FBI director's late-night drinking delays meetings: Report

Concerns are increasing within the FBI regarding the director Kash PatelColleagues allege that the Indian-origin agency chief engaged in heavy drinking and unexplained absences, which affected his leadership.According to several current and former FBI officials, Patel’s behavior has caused concern within the Bureau and across all parts of the US government. Some have described his tenure as irregular, pointing to incidents where his actions created confusion and disrupted normal operations.One such episode occurred on April 10, when Patel struggled to log into internal systems and thought he was locked out. He thought he was fired from his job and panicked and contacted his colleagues. This situation caused concern within the FBI and calls to the White House and members of Congress regarding who was leading the agency. It was later discovered that the problem was a technical error.According to a report cited by The Atlantic, more than two dozen people, including FBI employees and others familiar with his work, told reporters that Patel was “erratic, suspicious of others and quick to jump to conclusions before he had the necessary evidence.” Several officers said his drinking had repeatedly been a matter of concern. She alleged that he appeared intoxicated on several occasions, including at private venues in Washington and on trips to Las Vegas. Some said meetings and briefings were delayed due to alcohol-related late nights.On more than one occasion, members of his security detail reportedly struggled to wake him up. In one instance, a request for “breach equipment” was made after failing to respond from behind closed doors.Officials have also expressed concern about their availability at critical moments. Some said they were worried about how he would respond in the event of a major security threat. Patel’s response to the death of MAGA commentator Charlie Kirk also faced backlash. One officer said, “This is the thing that keeps me up at night.”Patel’s presence has also been questioned. Sources cited by The Atlantic say he is often absent from FBI headquarters, causing delays in decision making. In some cases, this slowed down investigations and frustrated agents.His handling of sensitive matters has also drawn criticism. He publicly announced that the FBI had detained a “person of interest” in a high-profile shooting, but the person was later released as the investigation continued.Additionally, Patel has the strong support of US President Donald Trump and some in the GOP administration.Patel has denied the allegations. In a statement quoted by him, the FBI said: “Print it, it’s all lies, I’ll see you in court – bring your checkbook.”

Source link

Protests begin after claims of attack on Epsom Church, police find no evidence

एप्सम चर्च पर हमले के दावे के बाद विरोध प्रदर्शन शुरू, पुलिस को कोई सबूत नहीं मिला

Protests begin after claims of attack on Epsom Church, police find no evidence

Police investigating an alleged attack near a church in Epsom have said no evidence has yet been found to support the claim, even as the incident sparked protests and widespread speculation online.Surrey Police said inquiries were ongoing and urged the public not to share unverified information, Sky News reported.The investigation began after a young woman reported being followed while leaving a venue in Epsom late on Saturday night. The alleged incident was reported to have taken place between 2am and 4am near a church on Ashley Road.The report quickly gained popularity on social media, leading to speculation about those allegedly involved. However, officials said extensive inquiries have so far failed to prove the claim.Police have reviewed CCTV footage, conducted door-to-door inquiries and conducted forensic searches in the area. Detective Inspector Sarah Graham said that despite “extensive and detailed” efforts, no evidence had emerged to confirm the alleged attack.He also warned against misinformation circulating online, including claims linking the incident to asylum seekers or migrants, saying such speculation was unfounded and unhelpful to the investigation.The lack of official details sparked protests in the city earlier this week, with demonstrators gathering in the city center demanding greater transparency. Some roads were blocked for some time as police monitored the situation.Surrey Police have increased patrols in the area to reassure residents and maintain public order. Officials reiterated that the investigation is ongoing and all aspects of the investigation are being examined.Officials and community leaders have appealed for calm and urged people to trust verified updates and avoid spreading rumors during the sensitive investigation.

Source link

Lebanese people returning to ‘uninhabitable’ areas as ceasefire with Israel mostly holds

Lebanese people returning to 'uninhabitable' areas as ceasefire with Israel mostly holds

People uprooted by the war in Lebanon began returning to devastated towns and neighborhoods on Friday, with many finding their homes destroyed or uninhabitable and hesitant to live there for fear of a ceasefire. Hezbollah And Israel can settle down.US President Trump said on Friday that the US has banned Israel from carrying out further bombings in Lebanon, a day after announcing a 10-day ceasefire. In a social media post, Trump said, “Israel will no longer bomb Lebanon.”

Watch

ON CAM: Israeli flag torn down as IDF troops leave Lebanon; Hezbollah flags were raised amid the celebrations

“They are banned from doing this by the United States, enough!!!” He said. The agreement between Lebanon and Israel has raised optimism that the parallel war between the US and Iran could be ending.While Trump says Lebanon and Israel will work toward a long-term agreement, the ceasefire leaves big questions. In particular, it does not demand Israel withdraw troops occupying parts of the south, where Israel’s Defense Minister said Israeli troops would continue to demolish houses he claimed were being used by Hezbollah. Iran-backed Hezbollah, which acts independently of the Lebanese state, has said it retains the “right to protest.”Late Friday, at least one person was killed in an Israeli strike in southern Lebanon, the Lebanese Health Ministry said. The Israeli military said it was investigating the report.In Beirut’s Hezbollah-controlled southern suburbs, hills of debris stood where apartment blocks once stood and the smell of death hung in the air. Ali Hamza said they found their homes intact, but people are still afraid to return.“It is impossible to live in these conditions, and with these smells. “Despite the difficulty of displacement, full return is now difficult.” He had collected school books from home: “We lost everything; we don’t want his school year to be ruined.” In Qasmiyeh, southern Lebanon, cars were driving on a temporary crossing over the Litani River that was hastily built after the ceasefire came into effect at midnight local time (2100 GMT). Israel destroyed all bridges over the Litani during the war, also blowing up a bridge at Qasmiyeh on Thursday.Hezbollah on Friday expressed a “cautious commitment” to the ceasefire, but said it must ensure that all Israeli hostilities stop and limit Israeli forces’ “freedom of movement” in Lebanon.reuters

Source link

Is Netanyahu surprised by Trump’s post on Lebanon? The report claims that Israel sought clarification from America

Is Netanyahu surprised by Trump's post on Lebanon? The report claims that Israel sought clarification from America

US President Donald Trump stunned Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu by announcing that Israel is “prohibited” from carrying out further airstrikes in Lebanon, while Iran has announced it is reopening the Strait of Hormuz to commercial shipping amid a fragile regional truce, according to inputs from Axios.Trump’s comments caused immediate confusion in Israel and raised new questions over US policy toward the 10-day ceasefire between Israel and Lebanon. At the same time, Tehran’s decision to reopen one of the world’s most important oil shipping lanes signaled potential movement in broader US-Iran diplomacy.

Watch

Arab nations affected by sudden attack, Lebanon ceasefire under pressure. Description

“Israel will no longer bomb Lebanon. They are banned from doing so by the United States, enough!!!” Trump said on Friday.Axios reported that Netanyahu and his advisers were surprised by the statement, particularly because the armistice terms released Thursday by the U.S. State Department explicitly preserved Israel’s right to self-defense against “planned, imminent or ongoing attacks.”According to Axios, Israeli officials contacted the White House to seek clarification after learning of Trump’s comments through media reports. Aides, including Israeli Ambassador to Washington Yechiel Leiter, reportedly scrambled to determine whether Washington had changed its position.After Axios asked for comment, a US official said: “The presidential ceasefire agreement between Lebanon and Israel clearly states that Israel will not conduct any offensive military operations against Lebanese targets, but reserves its right to self-defense against planned, imminent or ongoing attacks.”Trump later reiterated his stance in an interview with Axios, saying, “Israel has to stop. They can’t keep blowing up buildings. I will not allow that.”Despite the ceasefire, military activity continued. Lebanese state media reported that an Israeli drone strike killed a motorcyclist in the southern city of Kunin shortly after Trump’s statement. Separately, an Israeli source said Hezbollah had violated the ceasefire by attacking Israeli forces.“Our forces acted in self-defense to eliminate the threat in accordance with the ceasefire agreement with the United States and Lebanon,” the Israeli source said.Meanwhile, Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi announced that commercial shipping through the Strait of Hormuz would resume during the Lebanon ceasefire.“In line with the ceasefire in Lebanon, the route through the Strait of Hormuz has been declared fully open for all commercial vessels for the remaining period of the ceasefire,” Araghchi said.However, a senior Iranian military official said military ships had been blocked from the waterway.Trump welcomed Iran’s announcement but said US pressure on Tehran would continue.“Thank you!” Trump posted, later adding: “The naval blockade will remain in full force and effect as it relates to Iran, only until our transaction with Iran is 100% completed.”He also wrote: “A great and wonderful day to the world!” And claimed that Iran had agreed that “the strait will no longer be used as a weapon against the world.”The Strait of Hormuz carries about a fifth of global oil shipments, and oil prices reportedly fell further following Iran’s announcement amid hopes of easing regional tensions.

voting

Should President Trump continue to pressure Tehran even as tensions ease?

In Israel, the military said wartime restrictions were being lifted to allow civilian movement and economic activity to resume, although Netanyahu warned that the campaign against Hezbollah was not over.“We are not done yet. We are planning to do some things to deal with the remaining rocket threat and the drone threat,” Netanyahu said.

Source link

With rising costs and travel concerns affecting overseas travel, Britons chose to stay in the UK. world News

Britons opt to stay in the UK as rising costs and travel concerns impact overseas travel
Rising costs and travel concerns are disrupting overseas holiday plans, so Britons are increasingly choosing staycations in the UK/Image: Getty Images

More people in Britain are choosing to holiday within the country this year, as rising fuel prices and concerns over international travel are disrupting plans for trips abroad, according to a report in the Financial Times.The change is already visible in the travel industry, with many holiday operators reporting an increase in domestic bookings over Easter as well as strong demand for the May half term and summer season.Search data supports this trend. Airbnb reported a 15 per cent year-on-year increase in searches for UK accommodation during the May bank holidays. Popular destinations included Northumberland, Pembrokeshire, Herefordshire, Gwynedd and Derbyshire, while Whitby in North Yorkshire emerged as the top choice during Easter, along with the Lake District and coastal areas of Dorset, Devon and Wales.Travel companies say that the nature of booking is also changing. Hannah Harrison, commercial director of Coaching Inn Group, told the Financial Times that demand has increased steadily since the spring. “We’re seeing an increase in bookings and people who are booking are spending more and staying longer,” he said.Holiday park operators are also reporting an increase. The Haven said bookings at its coastal sites had increased by 10 per cent compared to last year, while Sykes Holiday Cottages had seen an 18 per cent increase in visits over Easter. Butlin said its resorts were operating at full capacity, with an increase in last-minute bookings.Industry leaders suggest that uncertainty surrounding global events is influencing decisions. Matthew Price, chief executive of Away, told the Financial Times: “People don’t want to commit to flying.” He said rising household costs are also shaping behaviour, with travelers still looking for leisure but becoming more cautious about spending.Economic data reflects this change. Barclays reported that UK consumer spending on travel fell 3.3 percent in March compared with a year earlier, the first decline since 2021. Many travelers are delaying travel or opting for more affordable domestic holidays.At the same time, the demand for international travel has weakened. Data from Trivago shows that UK travelers’ searches for Middle East destinations have fallen by 48 percent, while interest in Turkey and Cyprus has fallen by more than a third, the Financial Times reports.For UK hospitality businesses, the increase in accommodation offers provides some relief. Operators are dealing with higher costs including energy bills, wage increases and rising business rates. Ian Dunstall, director of Upham Inns, told the Financial Times that strong domestic demand could help offset these pressures. “The demand for a stronger ban would be good compensation for us,” he said.However, challenges remain. Industry projections suggest the average hospitality property faces a 15 per cent increase in business rates this year, adding further pressure to the sector.Rising fuel prices are also a matter of concern. Petrol prices have climbed to almost £1.58 a litre, the highest level since 2022, raising questions about how much consumers can continue to spend.Adam Charity, managing director of the Coaching Inn Group, warned that financial pressures on families could limit growth. “My growing concern is about the actual cash available for people to spend,” he told the Financial Times.While domestic tourism is seeing renewed momentum, the sustainability of this trend will depend on how economic conditions evolve in the coming months.

Source link

What is so special about Iran’s uranium that America, China and Russia all want it?

What is so special about Iran's uranium that America, China and Russia all want it?

Iran’s rich uranium reserves have become the centerpiece of an increasingly complex global power competition, with the United States, China and Russia all seeking a role in determining its future, while Tehran says the material will not be handed over to anyone.What was once a technical issue within nuclear diplomacy has now become one of the most politically charged questions in international relations. For Washington, control over Iran’s uranium could mean blocking the path to any future nuclear weapons. For Moscow and Beijing, it provides influence on the shape of future Middle East agreements. For Iran, it represents sovereignty, strategic leverage, and national prestige.

Trump surrenders to Iran, deal sealed? US abandons $20 billion offer for Iran’s ‘nuclear dust’

The issue came back into the spotlight after US President Donald Trump claimed that Washington and Tehran were moving toward a deal under which Iran’s uranium would be recovered and eventually brought to the United States.Speaking to Reuters in a phone interview, Trump said the United States would work jointly with Iran to recover the stockpiles.Trump said, “We’re going to get through this together. We’re going to go leisurely with Iran and go down and start digging with big machinery.” “We’ll bring it back to the United States.”Trump said the material, which he described as “nuclear dust,” would be recovered “very soon.”Iran immediately rejected this suggestion.Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmail Baghai said, “Iran’s enriched uranium will not be transferred anywhere; transferring uranium to the United States is not an option for us.”The sharp contradiction in the talks brokered by Pakistan, reportedly with the support of Egypt and Türkiye, has exposed one of the central unresolved disputes.

Why does Iran’s uranium matter so much?

Uranium in its natural form cannot be used directly in nuclear weapons. It must first be enriched, a process that increases the concentration of the uranium-235 isotope.Low-enriched uranium is commonly used for civilian nuclear reactors. Highly enriched uranium could potentially be used in nuclear weapons.Western officials estimate that Iran has substantial reserves at several enrichment levels. According to US estimates cited in international reports, Iran has about 450 kilograms enriched to 60 percent purity, about 1,000 kilograms enriched to 20 percent and about 8,500 kilograms enriched to 3.6 percent.The 60 percent stockpile is particularly sensitive because it is considered only a small technological step up from weapons-grade enrichment of about 90 percent.This makes Iran’s uranium stockpile one of the most heavily monitored nuclear stockpiles in the world.Iran denies seeking nuclear weapons and says its nuclear activities are solely for peaceful civilian uses.

What is “nuclear dust”?

Trump’s use of the phrase “nuclear dust” is not a technical scientific term. This appears to be a political description of uranium material that they believe is buried, damaged or dispersed following earlier military attacks on Iranian nuclear infrastructure.The phrase probably refers to enriched uranium or uranium compounds stored inside damaged underground facilities, particularly near Isfahan, where parts of Iran’s nuclear program were reportedly affected during previous attacks.Experts say that uranium does not simply disappear after an attack. Depending on storage conditions, it may be recovered in containers, sealed chambers, buried debris, or damaged tunnels. That’s why Trump suggested digging with “big machinery.”In practical terms, “nuclear dust” means residual nuclear material that may still have strategic value even if the facilities around it have been destroyed.

Why does the United States want this?

For Washington, removing Iran’s uranium would be the most direct way to reduce Tehran’s ability to move rapidly toward a nuclear weapon.Trump has presented the issue as evidence that his administration can achieve a stronger arrangement than previous nuclear agreements.Trump also said Thursday that Iran had agreed to “a very, very powerful statement … that they will not have nuclear weapons.”If the uranium were transferred to the United States or neutralized under US-backed supervision, Trump could present it as a major diplomatic victory and a major security achievement.He also expressed confidence about the talks.He said, “I think the agreement will be reached very quickly. We are dealing very well with Iran.”

Why does Russia want a role?

Russia has publicly renewed its offer to host Iran’s enriched uranium under a future deal.The Kremlin said Moscow was ready to take possession of the materials, reviving an approach used in earlier diplomacy.“This proposal was put forward by President Putin in contact with both the United States and regional states. “The proposal still stands, but has not been acted upon,” Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said.Russia previously played a key role in the 2015 nuclear deal, when Iran shipped low-enriched uranium abroad as part of compliance measures.For Moscow, taking over the stockpile would restore influence in nuclear diplomacy, expand its Middle East relevance and position Russia as an indispensable mediator between Washington and Tehran.

Why is China interested?

China has also emerged as a potential player.China is prepared to take possession of Iranian uranium or melt it to low enrichment levels suitable for civilian use if both Washington and Tehran agree, the report said, citing diplomats familiar with Beijing’s thinking.China’s interest is strategic and economic.Beijing is Iran’s largest trading partner and the largest buyer of Iranian oil. There are strong incentives to prevent further conflict in the Gulf and to stabilize energy flows through the Strait of Hormuz.The Chinese role will also boost Beijing’s diplomatic standing and strengthen its image as a stable force in global crises.Trump is expected to visit Beijing for talks with the Chinese President Xi JinpingWhere Iran is expected to be on the agenda.

Why does Tehran refuse to give it up?

For Iran, the uranium issue is not just about nuclear science. It is closely related to politics, prestige and sovereignty.Iranian leaders have long portrayed enrichment capabilities as a symbol of technological progress and resistance to foreign pressure.Analysts say handing over the reserves to the United States would be politically difficult to defend domestically.“Iran’s attachment to uranium enrichment is deeply ideological,” Professor Ali Ansari told the Guardian. “It’s almost an obsession with national prestige.”Regardless of whether Tehran accepts inspections, a temporary limitation, or external monitoring, physically handing over the uranium could be viewed internally as a capitulation.This helps explain the immediate and obvious rejection of Trump’s claims.

Why would it be difficult to remove

Even if a political agreement is reached, physically removing the content can be one of the most difficult parts of any deal.Some of the uranium is believed to be stored in underground tunnels or damaged facilities near Isfahan.Military and nuclear experts have warned that any recovery mission would require excavation, safe transport, radiation precautions and international verification.One expert described the challenge clearly.“You basically have half a ton of weapons-grade uranium that you have to extract. And there are a million things that can go wrong.”This means that diplomatic success will be only the first step. Implementation may take weeks or months.

$20 billion report adds controversy

Fresh questions also emerged after Axios reported that the United States is considering releasing $20 billion of frozen Iranian assets if Tehran gives up its uranium stockpile.The report said Washington was previously prepared to release $6 billion for humanitarian purposes, while Iran had sought $27 billion.Trump strongly denied that the money was part of any arrangement.“This is a complete lie. No money is changing hands,” he said.He later posted on Truth Social: “No money is changing hands.”A White House spokesperson said the administration “will not negotiate through the press” and that the unnamed sources “don’t know what they’re talking about.”

what happens next

Negotiators are expected to continue talks in the coming days, but the uranium dispute remains a clear barometer of whether a comprehensive solution is truly possible.Washington wants a guarantee that Iran cannot move forward rapidly in the direction of making a bomb. Iran wants relief from sanctions, security assurances and recognition of its right to peaceful nuclear energy.Russia and China see an opportunity to shape the outcome.Whether Iran’s uranium is removed, diluted, stored abroad or kept under tight surveillance could determine whether diplomacy succeeds or collapses.For now, a stockpile of uranium has become the strategic prize that the United States, China and Russia all want, and an asset that Tehran has refused to surrender.

Source link