It was a memorable night at the Shaheed Veer Narayan Singh International Stadium in Raipur on Sunday, May 10, as the Indian Premier League played out one of its first real low-scoring thrillers of the season. Bhuvneshwar Kumar, who hit his first IPL six in 10 years, proved to be a hero for the defending champions as they needed him most, performing well with both bat and ball.

RCB had lagged behind in the playoff race this season after losing two consecutive games against Delhi Capitals and Gujarat Titans. In dire need of breaking that sequence, RCB found a savior in Bhuvneshwar Kumar, who took three wickets for them in the powerplay.

IPLRCB vs MI: highlighted | Achievement:

An exceptional opening spell helped RCB restrict Mumbai Indians to 28/3 at the end of three overs. He later made a comeback in the death overs to dismiss Tilak Verma, Mumbai’s best batsman that night, when he looked set to provide a big finish for MI in the first innings of the match.

Bhuvneshwar might have thought that his four-over quick spell, where he recorded figures of 4/24, was enough to win the game for RCB. However, the seam bowler found himself in trouble once again, this time in 19.4 overs, with RCB needing 11 runs to win off the last three balls.

Hearts pounding and doubt creeping in, Bhuvneshwar hit a wide yorker from Raj Angad Bawa. The ball caught the meat of the bat and bounced over the deep point fielder for his first IPL six in the last 10 years.

OG IPL fans will remember the time when Bhuvneshwar Kumar was known as a pinch hitter. In the 2016 season of the IPL, during SRH’s title-winning campaign, Bhuvneshwar also scored 43 runs at a strike-rate of 160.

But over the years, those capabilities had diminished. And perhaps no one would have believed on Sunday that Bhuvi could do something like this for the defending champions.

With the stage set for a thrill on the last ball after Bhuvneshwar’s six, RCB’s tail-enders ensured they did not spoil the game. Two runs were needed to win, but Bhuvneshwar and Rasikh Salam had the presence of mind to run hard between the wickets, hit a big dive and save the dying match for RCB.

MI keeper Ryan Rickelton, who ran madly up to the stumps and smashed the wickets, threw the ball away in frustration, knowing full well that it had not reached him in time.

It was a clear indictment of Mumbai Indians this season, where they found themselves trailing the competition due to small but costly mistakes throughout the campaign.

Krunal showed his inner Maxwell

The target was expected to be easily achieved after a good performance by the bowlers, but it turned out to be a nightmare for RCB, who lost their talisman Virat Kohli for a duck on the very first ball, his second in a row this season.

When Deepak Chahar created a ruckus in the powerplay and removed Devdutt Padikkal with a sensational delivery in the off-stump channel, alarm bells rang.

The pressure mounted on RCB, as it had in the last two matches, as Corbyn Bosch made the best of the surface up and down the field and troubled the RCB batsmen a lot. Many of those balls hit the batsmen, which shows how unfavorable Bosch’s spell had become.

This is where RCB got the aggressive Krunal Pandya. After the dismissal of Rajat Patidar, Krunal handled the RCB innings very carefully. He controlled Bosch’s aggressive spell and cut the ball loose in the ninth over of the match.

As others struggled around him, Krunal’s well-thought-out counter-attacks kept RCB in the game. Towards the end of his innings, Krunal was struggling with cramps and was jumping up and down after almost every ball.

But that didn’t stop him from really coming alive in the latter stages of his innings. More importantly, he played almost 50 balls on a surface where most batsmen were struggling and still managed to score 74 runs, once again playing a vital innings for RCB, as he did in their title-winning season last year.

The match changed in the 18th over, when Krunal was caught by Naman Dheer at midwicket while trying to hit a six off Allah Ghazanfar. The fielder bounded between his legs and threw the ball towards Tilak Verma near the boundary line. Tilak, perhaps thinking that Naman Dheer had crossed the boundary cushion, did not attempt a relay catch, which brought great relief to RCB.

Krunal took full advantage of that gift of life and hit Ghazanfar with two powerful blows on the next three balls. However, he was not successful in lasting till the end, as he lost his wicket while attempting to hit the third six of the over on the last ball of the same over.

When Tilak completed the high catch the RCB dugout sank, almost believing that the fate of the game was sealed. But see later, after a big relief, those two extra sixes probably won the match for RCB.

Evergreen Bhuvneshwar Kumar

Bhuvneshwar Kumar was named Player of the Match for his special spell of 4/24 and the match-winning six that tilted the game in RCB’s favour. In an era where almost every batsman is desperate to hit a six, it was only fitting that a low-scoring thriller was decided by a man who had not hit a six for a decade.

Bhuvi’s series of deceptions, where he looked to mix his trademark outswing with a deceptive knuckle ball, helped RCB take control of the match very early in the contest.

Bhuvneshwar destroyed the MI team by taking the wickets of Ryan Rickelton, Rohit Sharma and Suryakumar Yadav in the powerplay. Later, he returned to clean bowl the aggressive Tilak Verma as well.

After that four-wicket spell, Bhuvneshwar Kumar now holds the record for most wickets in IPL 2026 after 11 matches. With 21 wickets to his name, one wonders why this player cannot be given a farewell T20I for India. Bhuvi has not played for the national team for almost four years, and it would perhaps be a fitting farewell for one of the special servants of Indian cricket.

ipl 2026 | ipl schedule | ipl points table | ipl player stats | purple cap | orange cap | ipl video | cricket news | live score

– ends

Israeli forces had set up a temporary base using an old airstrip in the Iraqi desert during the war against Iran, two security officials told AFP on Sunday, confirming a Wall Street Journal report.At the start of the war, which was sparked by joint US-Israeli strikes on Iran on February 28, troops were found in the Najaf desert in the southwest of the country and clashed with Iraqi forces, killing one soldier and wounding two others. “Israeli forces established a base in an abandoned airstrip built by Saddam Hussein in the Najaf desert,” the security official said.“There are no troops there anymore, but they may have left equipment,” he said, adding that the Israeli operation was “in coordination with the US”. It was not clear how long the forces had been there or what their mission was.Iraq was involved in the Middle East war from the beginning, with the US and Israel accused of targeting Iran-backed armed groups, resulting in hundreds of attacks on US interests in Iraq and throughout the Gulf region. News of foreign troops in the desert emerged early in the war after a shepherd reported military activity. On Saturday, the Wall Street Journal reported that “Israel set up a secret military base in the Iraqi desert to support its air campaign against Iran”, citing people familiar with the matter, including US officials. The report said that “Israel built this installation with the knowledge of the US, which housed special forces and served as a logistics hub.” The Israeli military has not yet commented.Following the WSJ report, an Iraqi spokesman cited a statement issued on March 5. At the time, Qais al-Mohammadwi, Iraq’s deputy commander of joint operations, told state media that Iraq had protested to the US-led anti-jihadist coalition deployed in the country about the airstrike in Najaf. He said that after receiving reports of “individuals or movement in the Najaf desert”, Iraq’s military sent a force to investigate. The soldiers came under heavy aerial fire, in which one soldier was killed and two others were injured. Additional forces later searched the area, but “found nothing”, Mohammadavi said. “No foreign troops were authorized to be at that location.” Another security official said that “there are indications that an Israeli technical team was involved in the operation.” agencies

US President Donald Trump’s “Gold Card” visa scheme is struggling to attract the wealthy foreigners it was designed to attract, with several immigration lawyers warning clients to stay away from the program over legal and financial concerns.According to a report in the Washington Post, lawyers advising ultra-wealthy clients say that ongoing litigation, tax complications and uncertainty around Visa’s legal status make the plan too risky to recommend. The visa was unveiled by Trump in June last year and formally launched through an executive order in September. It costs between $1 million and $2 million, with a $15,000 application fee. The administration has also promoted it as a $5 million pathway to wealthy investors.Even lawyers with close ties to the Trump family have distanced themselves from the event. Michael Wildes, the immigration attorney who represents first lady Melania Trump, her parents, Kushner family members and multiple Miss Universe winners, said he will refuse to take clients seeking gold cards.“It would be unethical for me to retain them,” Wildes told the Washington Post.The biggest issue for many lawyers is that the visa has not been approved by Congress, meaning a future administration could potentially revoke it. Rosanna Berardi, another immigration lawyer, said the uncertainty alone was enough to discourage clients from applying.“As immigration counsel, our obligation is always to protect the interests of our clients,” he told the Post.He added: “And we believe it is not appropriate to recommend a program with such significant legal uncertainty and financial risk, even when clients express a desire to proceed.”A handful of applicants are still undergoing testing. Immigration lawyer Mona Shah said she currently has two clients from Nigeria and Pakistan, who are in different stages of the application process. However, he said he warned them both that the program could amount to “false advertising” and would ultimately go nowhere. According to Shah, his clients were prepared to lose money if the scheme failed.US government data show that interest in the program is well below the administration’s ambitious projections. A petition filed last week in a Department of Homeland Security (DHS) court revealed that only 338 people had submitted requests for the Trump Gold Card, while just 165 applicants had paid the $15,000 processing fee.This contrasts with earlier claims by Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, who had previously predicted that the program would generate more than $100 billion by issuing 80,000 gold cards. Lutnick also claimed in March that 1,000 Gold Cards had already been issued before the program officially launched.The DHS filing further states that Gold Card applicants will not be ranked ahead of EB-1 or EB-2 visa applicants, categories reserved for highly skilled and exceptional workers.

Stanley Baldwin (Image: Wikipedia)

Some quotes still resonate decades after they were uttered because they deal with ideas that transcend generations. One such statement was made by the former British Prime Minister Stanley Baldwin, who once said, “I would rather trust a woman’s instinct than a man’s reason”. Although the quote is short and simple, it has remained relevant because it spurs conversations about intuition, emotional intelligence, decision-making and the historical treatment of women’s views in society.The quote may surprise you at first glance, especially considering the era in which Baldwin lived and reigned. Politics in the early twentieth century was a male-dominated enterprise, and public leadership was associated with logic, authority and rational decision-making. Yet Baldwin’s statement seems to recognise something else, the value of instinct, perception and emotional understanding.The quote has been interpreted in various ways over the years. For some readers, it is a praise of women’s intuition and emotional insight. Others see it more as a general meditation on how instinct can sometimes prevail where cold reasoning cannot. But whether or not this is a correct interpretation, the statement is still true today, as current discussions on leadership, emotional intelligence, and decision-making are starting to consider the importance of empathy and intuition, in addition to logic.

Quote of the day by Stanley Baldwin

“I would rather trust a woman’s instinct than a man’s reason”

What is the meaning of the quote by Stanley Baldwin

The quote contrasts two concepts that are often considered to be opposed: instinct and reason. Reason is generally equated with logic, calculation, analysis and rational thought. Instinct, on the other hand, is intuition, emotional awareness, gut feeling and immediate understanding.When Stanley Baldwin said he would trust a woman’s instinct over a man’s reason, he might not have been entirely dismissing logic. Instead, the statement appears to suggest that sometimes pure reasoning can never give us the insight that instinct and emotional perception can.Human decisions are rarely just logical. In personal and professional situations, people often work on emotional judgment, life experience, observation and intuition. Today, many psychologists argue that intuition is not irrational at all. Instead, it can be said to reflect the brain’s capacity to rapidly process patterns and experiences without conscious analysis.That’s one reason the quote still resonates today. It challenges the idea that logical thinking is always the best way to be.

Who was Stanley Baldwin

Stanley Baldwin was one of Britain’s most important political figures during the early twentieth century. Born in 1867, he served as the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom three times in the 1920s and 1930s.Baldwin’s time in office was one of political uncertainty, economic difficulties, labour unrest and increasing international tension before the Second World War. He was known for his quiet way of speaking, measured political method and his ability to reach ordinary people.Unlike many of his contemporaries in politics, Baldwin often pushed for moderation and public understanding rather than dramatic rhetoric. His speeches were often more about social concerns and human behaviour than mere political strategy.The quote about trusting a woman’s instinct reflects his broader interest in human judgment and character. Although society during his time remained deeply shaped by traditional gender roles, Baldwin’s statement appears to recognise qualities often overlooked in public leadership discussions of that era.

Why intuition has become an important topic in modern psychology

Modern psychology has greatly changed the way in which people understand intuition. “Previous generations often considered instinct to be emotional or unreliable. Today, many researchers believe that intuition plays an important part in human decision-making.Psychologists say that intuition is the result of a great many experiences and observations, and of subconscious pattern-recognition. So, a lot of times, people make quick decisions based on information that their brain has already processed without them even knowing it.This is especially common in fast-paced fields such as medicine, emergency response, sports, business and leadership. Experienced professionals often rely on “gut feelings” which are actually correct because their brains can identify patterns developed over the years.Stanley Baldwin’s quote is startling in its modernity in that it reflects an increasing awareness that emotional insight and intuition should not be automatically overlooked in preference to cold logic alone.

The historical view of women’s intuition

For centuries, in many societies, there has been the idea of “women’s intuition.” Women have traditionally been described as being more perceptive of emotions, more empathetic and socially aware than men. Some of these assumptions were based on stereotypes, but current research suggests that emotional intelligence and social sensitivity are indeed human strengths.Those who study emotional intelligence often find that empathy, active listening, and emotional awareness are major contributors to successful relationships and leadership. These qualities are now well respected in the workplace, education, healthcare and management.Baldwin’s quote seems to recognise these strengths. It emphasises the importance of intuition and emotional perception, as opposed to just analytical reasoning.Nevertheless, the quote is still being debated, as the attitude of gender roles among modern readers is different from that of previous generations. Some consider the statement a respectful appreciation of emotional intelligence. Others believe intuition and reason should not be divided by gender at all.

Why emotional intelligence matters in leadership today

There is no place where emotional intelligence is discussed more as a quality of leadership than in the modern workplace and in politics. People don’t just judge leaders on their technical skills or strategic thinking. Today, good leadership is largely a matter of communication, empathy, adaptability, and emotional awareness.Organisational psychology research has shown that emotionally intelligent leaders are more likely to develop better teams, to resolve conflict better, and to create healthier workplace cultures.This is the same balance suggested by the quote from Baldwin. Logic is important. But understanding people emotionally is just as important. Human emotions, social dynamics, trust and communication all influence decision-making, and instinct and empathy are useful.Today, many companies are actively training managers in emotional intelligence, as workplaces are increasingly recognising that technical ability alone isn’t enough for successful leadership.

Why people continue to share quotes about instinct and intuition

Intuition quotes are still in fashion, as there are times when human beings feel that instinct is very strong. Many people can remember situations where a feeling, an impression, or an emotional perception later proved to be true.Science continues to study intuition because it occupies a fascinating space between emotion and cognition. Pure logic is not always correct, nor is intuition. Both are usually involved in human decision-making.That’s one reason Baldwin’s quote is memorable. It resonates with a universal human experience: the tension between rational analysis and instinctive understanding.The quote also lives on because it is brief and emotionally charged. Assumptions in statements that challenge often go on for generations because they are subject to interpretation and debate.

How society’s view of intelligence has evolved

Traditionally, intelligence was measured by academic ability, logic and analytic reason. Emotional understanding was paid much less attention to.But in the last few decades, psychologists and educators have broadened the very definition of intelligence. Now, emotional intelligence, social intelligence, adaptability, empathy and communication are considered critical dimensions of human capability.This broader notion of intelligence offers some explanation as to why the quote by Baldwin remains so relevant today. It recognises that wisdom may not be logical, but emotional perception and instinctual understanding.Modern leadership gurus often say that the best decision makers are analytical thinkers, but also empathetic and intuitive. Pure reasoning without emotional awareness sometimes can miss important human realities.

Intuition in everyday life

In ordinary life, instinct plays a far greater part than many people realise. People often use intuition to judge trust, relationships, opportunities or risks. Often, parents, teachers, doctors, and leaders make decisions based on emotional understanding and their own judgment.Emotional perception is especially important in relationships. People are constantly reading tone, body language, expressions and social signals, often without consciously analysing them. This is a very handy skill to have in a complex social world.Baldwin’s quote expresses this truth we all know, and readers can relate to it. Many decisions are not purely calculative, but a mixture of experience, empathy and instinct.

The quote’s relevance in modern conversations about gender

Today’s conversations about gender are more complex and nuanced. Baldwin’s words can be interpreted in different ways depending on the cultural outlook and personal convictions of contemporary readers.Others see the quote as recognising women’s emotional intelligence at a time when women’s contribution to public life was often underestimated. Intuition and reason are human qualities, not gender specific, some people say.The quote continues to be controversial, no matter how you interpret it, because it touches on age-old questions about how people make decisions and how societies value different kinds of intelligence.It also shows how public conversations around gender have changed over time. Comments that once seemed out of place now spark wider conversations about equality, leadership styles and emotional intelligence.

Why the quote still resonates generations later

What gives Baldwin’s statement its timelessness is the emotional and philosophical profundity. It doesn’t just compare men and women. It is a reflection of a larger truth about human judgment itself.Throughout history, civilisations have tended to overvalue logic and undervalue emotional insight. However, people seldom work on reason alone. Emotional understanding is the basis for relationships, for leadership, for morality, for creativity, for communication.The quote is relevant to the present day because modern society is finding out that empathy and emotional intelligence are becoming important in personal and professional life.In a world of data, analytics, competition and technology, people are still searching for a balance of rational thought and human instinct. In a single, remarkably simple sentence, Baldwin captures that balance.

A reminder that wisdom is not built on logic alone

Finally, the quote of Stanley Baldwin encapsulates an essential idea: human understanding is more complex than pure reasoning. Logic may account for facts and systems but intuition often helps people understand emotions, relationships and human behaviour.The quote does not exclude reason. But it suggests that emotional awareness and instinct can sometimes sense truths that analysis cannot fully understand.That’s why, decades later, the statement still comes up in conversations about leadership, psychology, relationships and human behaviour. It reminds us that wisdom usually comes from a balance of head and heart.Finally, the quote of Stanley Baldwin captures an essential idea: human understanding is more complex than pure reasoning. Logic can explain facts and systems, but intuition often helps people to understand emotions, relationships and human behaviour.The quote doesn’t exclude reason. But it does suggest that instinct and emotional awareness can sometimes sense truths that analysis can’t quite grasp.That is why the statement still finds its way into conversations about leadership, psychology, relationships and human behaviour, decades later. It serves as a reminder that wisdom often comes from balancing intellect and emotional understanding.In a world where decisions impact systems and people, perhaps that balance is more important than ever today. In today’s world, where decisions increasingly affect both systems and people, that balance may matter more than ever.