One vote, two Tirupattur: DMK flags postal ballot irregularities after High Court order (Image credit: ANI)

New Delhi: The Madras High Court has barred a TVK MLA from voting in the assembly floor test due to possible mix-up of postal votes between Tirupattur in Sivagangai district and Tirupattur district near Vellore, the DMK said on Tuesday.While TVK’s Seenivasa Sethupathi got 83,375 votes, DMK’s KR Periyakruppan got 83,374 votes in the election. Sethupathi was declared elected by a margin of only one vote.“If even one disputed vote is counted in favor of the DMK, the numbers will be tied, leading to a coin toss to decide the election,” DMK spokesperson Saravanan Annadurai told PTI.The court has directed the MLA not to vote until the writ petition reaches a conclusion.The fight between DMK and TVK continued till 1:30 am on the day of counting. Periakaruppan remained in the lead till the 16th round, but Sethupathi took the lead from the 17th round. At the end of EVM counting, he was ahead by 819 votes and secured 83,010 votes against Periyakruppan’s 82,191 votes.With the addition of postal ballots – 1,183 for Periakaruppan and 365 for Sethupathi – the final count was 83,374 for Periakaruppan and 83,375 for Sethupathi.District Election Officer K. Therefore the votes had to be counted through VVPAT.“As per ECI guidelines when the margin is one vote, we had to re-verify 306 rejected postal ballots,” the Collector said. After re-verification, no valid votes were found to change the margin.The Returning Officer decided not to order a recount, providing a written explanation for the decision.

Photo credit:

TEL AVIV: Israel sent Iron Dome anti-missile batteries and the personnel to operate them to the United Arab Emirates to defend the country during the Iran war, US Ambassador to the country Mike Huckabee said on Tuesday.Mike Huckabee’s comments underscore growing defense ties between Israel and the United Arab Emirates, countries that have long been suspicious of Iran because of the still-shaky ceasefire in the Iran war. However, the narrow Strait of Hormuz remains in Tehran’s grip and talks between the US and Iran appear to be at a standstill for the time being, increasing the risk of re-igniting conflict.Huckabee, a Baptist minister, former governor of Arkansas and one-time presidential candidate, made the remarks during an event in Tel Aviv, Israel.“I want to say a word of appreciation to the United Arab Emirates, a member of the first Abraham Accords,” Huckabee said at the Tel Aviv conference. “Just look at the benefits. Israel has sent Iron Dome batteries and personnel to help operate them.” he adds.The United Arab Emirates, a federation of seven sheikhdoms on the Arabian Peninsula, diplomatically recognized Israel in 2020.The UAE did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Huckabee’s acceptance.Huckabee said he was “very optimistic” that additional countries in the region would soon join the Abraham Accords, the 2020 diplomatic recognition deal that also included the Gulf Arab kingdom of Bahrain for formal ties with Israel.However, many Arab states are angered by Israel’s extensive military operations following Hamas’s 2023 attack on the country, including the leveling of the Gaza Strip and attacks by Iran’s allies across the wider Middle East. Israel now also controls territory in Lebanon and Syria.“The Gulf countries now understand they have to make a choice – is it more likely that they will be attacked by Iran or Israel?” Huckabee asked. “They see that Israel helped us and Iran attacked us. Israel is not trying to occupy your land, and is not sending missiles at you.”

Alfred Nobel (Image: Wikipedia)

Love, emotions and human relationships have always been some of the most complex aspects of life. For centuries, philosophers, scientists, writers and thinkers have tried to explain why people feel affection, attachment, trust or distance. Alfred Nobel made a very thoughtful comment on this point when he said, “A heart can no more be forced to love than the stomach can be forced to digest food by coaxing.”This quote may seem simple at first, but it speaks to a truth that is deeply human. Nobel compares emotional bonds to a physical, natural thing. You cannot tell the body to digest food just by words. You cannot make the human heart feel love through pressure, obligation, or force. Real feelings come naturally. They cannot be created by social expectation or persuasion.And this still rings true today. In modern relationships, friendships, workplaces, and even family structures, people still struggle with emotional expectations and the need for acceptance. Nobel’s words are a subtle reminder that some human experiences should not be controlled or demanded. They have to evolve naturally and honestly over time.

Today’s Quote by Alfred Nobel

“No more can a heart be forced to love than the stomach can be forced to digest food by persuasion.”

What is the hidden meaning in this statement of Alfred Nobel?

The beauty of the quote is its simplicity. Nobel makes a comparison that everyone can understand. Digestion is an automatic biological process. It cannot be done because someone says or argues that it should be done. Emotional attachment doesn’t happen because people want it to happen.The quote is about the difference between pressure felt from the outside and felt from the inside. Human emotions are very personal and often unpredictable. Love, trust and affection develop from shared experiences, understanding, care and emotional connection, not from obligation.Nobel’s words are also associated with an important psychological truth. Trying to pursue feelings often gets you resistance, not intimacy. No real emotional connection can develop under pressure in personal relationships or social settings.This observation remains relevant as many people struggle with expectations related to relationships, family approval, social obligations, and emotional conformity.

Beyond Who was Alfred Nobel? nobel prize

Today most people know Alfred Nobel as the founder of the Nobel Prize, one of the world’s most respected international awards. But Nobel’s own life was more complex than most people know.Alfred Nobel was a Swedish inventor, chemist, engineer, businessman and author born in 1833. During his lifetime, he held over 350 patents and became most famous for inventing dynamite, a safer way to handle nitroglycerin for industrial purposes such as mining and construction.Dynamite revolutionized engineering and infrastructure, but it also gained a reputation as a weapon of war and destruction. That double inheritance would later have a profound impact on Nobel’s life.In 1888, a French newspaper published an obituary on him, thinking that he had died (it was his brother, Ludwig Nobel, who had died). In his obituary he has been called a “merchant of death”. It is said that it had a deep impact on him when he read how the world would remember him.Many historians believe that this experience influenced Nobel’s decision to create a Nobel Prize in his will. He wanted his money to be used for achievements that would help mankind, be they science, literature, medicine or peace.

Why do Nobel quotes still connect with people today?

Modern society puts more pressure on relationships and emotional expectations. Sometimes social norms dictate that people should feel affection, loyalty, admiration, or emotional closeness.Nobel’s quote suggests the opposite. It knows that genuine feelings cannot be forced merely by social pressure.This message resonates strongly in today’s world, where relationships are increasingly defined by digital communications, public image, and external validation. Social media often shows idealized versions of love and emotional connection, which can create unrealistic expectations.Nobel’s words bring us back to focus on emotional honesty. True affection is not negotiable like a business deal. It comes naturally with trust, understanding and emotional compatibility.

Human emotions cannot always be rationalized

One reason the Nobel quote remains so powerful is that it recognizes the complexity of human emotions. People think you can control emotions with logic, but emotions don’t follow rules.For a long time, psychologists have studied how emotional attachment is created through a combination of biology, memory, environment, and personal experience. Emotional connection is more important than decision making.This reality is reflected in Nobel’s analogy of love and digestion. There are human processes that are natural and cannot be completely controlled by persuasion or reason.This is why forced relationships, emotional manipulation or social pressure often do not create real relationships.

The emotional cost of forced expectations

In many societies throughout history, personal relationships have been fraught with expectations. People were repeatedly advised to keep up appearances, regardless of how they were really feeling.People were sometimes expected to cling to relationships, beliefs, or social systems even if they were unhappy. Nobel’s quote gently refutes the notion that emotions cannot be forged through pressure.Modern psychology also knows the emotional effects of suppression of real feelings. Emotional dishonesty can also be a source of stress, anxiety, resentment, and emotional isolation.Healthy relationships are usually based on mutual understanding and voluntary emotional connection, not mere obligation.

Why does authenticity matter in relationships?

Nobel’s words also highlight the importance of honesty in human relationships. Real relationships generally emerge when people feel emotionally safe enough to speak their truth.Trust and emotional closeness are rarely sustainable in the long run when they are based on performance or expectation.These days, authenticity is more valuable than ever, as many people are tired of the constant pressure of social performance and digital presentation. For many, it is a competition for real emotional engagement in public image.Nobel’s quote reminds readers that emotions are still very human, and they cannot be completely controlled by social systems or persuasion.

Alfred Nobel’s life was full of contradictions

One reason Nobel is of historical interest is that his life was full of contradictions. He was a scientist whose inventions not only changed the face of industry, but also became associated with war. He acquired immense wealth but was said to suffer from loneliness and personal isolation.Nobel never married and traveled for business and scientific work for most of his life. Historians say that he was brilliant in intellect but restrained in emotions.His writings and personal letters reveal that he spent much time thinking about morality, relationships, and human nature. This quote, and others, reveal Nobel’s more contemplative and philosophical side, often influenced by his achievements in science.

Relationship between science and emotion

Nobel is remembered primarily for science and engineering, but his quote shows how deeply scientific thinkers can consider emotional life as well.Science is generally about understanding physical systems and what can be observed. But many great scientists have also investigated questions of meaning, emotion, morality, and human behavior.Nobel’s analogy between digestion and emotional attachment is an example of scientific thinking applied to human relationships. He states an emotional truth through an organic process.The reason the quote is so enduring is the combination of rational observation and emotional understanding.

Why do people still struggle with emotional control?

Despite advances in psychology and communication, humans still often attempt to control emotions through persuasion, pressure, or expectation.Parents may push their children into certain relationships or career choices. Social systems may promote emotional congruence. Public opinion can influence the way people express their personal feelings.But as Nobel’s quote shows, you can’t demand emotional authenticity merely by existing.This is still true today, as many people feel this tension between emotions and expectations.

Love as a natural human experience

One of the most enduring ideas in Nobel’s quote is that love is most effective when it is allowed to grow naturally.Healthy emotional attachments are typically formed over time through shared experiences, trust, vulnerability, and mutual caring. When you try to force or intensify emotional closeness, you usually only create instability.Literature, psychology and philosophy all reflect this viewpoint. Genuine human connection is something that emerges organically, not through control.Nobel expressed this truth in the simplest language possible. Perhaps that is why this quote has remained relevant across generations.

Other famous quotes from Alfred Nobel

How does Nobel’s legacy continue today?

Today, the name Nobel is known throughout the world because of the Nobel Prize, which is awarded annually for outstanding achievements in the fields of physics, chemistry, medicine, literature, peace and economic sciences.The awards recognize those whose work has greatly benefited mankind. Nobel’s decision to establish these prizes revolutionized global recognition of scientific, cultural and humanitarian achievements.The Nobel Prize is recognized around the world every year because it is a symbol of excellence, discovery, and worldwide influence.But even more than the awards, the Nobel Prizes themselves remain of interest because they show a more philosophical and humanitarian side of the inventor.

Why do simple quotes often leave the deepest impact?

Nobel’s quote is memorable in part because it expresses a complex emotional truth in the language of common human experience.People understand hunger, digestion, love and emotional despair. Nobel weaves these familiar experiences in a way that feels immediate and honest.Unlike abstract philosophy, it appears to be based on everyday life. It acknowledges what most people learn from experience: that you can’t always control your emotions with logic or persuasion.That simple insight is what gives the quote its lasting emotional impact.

The enduring relevance of Nobel’s words

More than a century after Alfred Nobel’s death, his words still resonate because human emotions have not fundamentally changed. People still want love, acceptance, emotional security, and real relationships.Many people struggle at the same time with the expectations placed on relationships by society, family, or personal pressure.Nobel’s quote subtly reminds the reader that real love cannot be ordered or bargained into existence. It must happen spontaneously, truthfully, willingly.That understanding remains deeply relevant today in every generation.

PM Modi and Arvind Kejriwal (R)

New Delhi: Aam Aadmi Party supremo Arvind Kejriwal Sharp questions were asked to the Prime Minister on Tuesday Narendra ModiThe “seven appeals” to citizens amid the ongoing conflict in West Asia say the country is “shocked” by the government’s message on the economy.Addressing a press conference, the AAP chief said India has gone through many crises since independence, including wars and economic recession, but such a widespread public appeal had never been made before.“Since 1950, the country has faced several crises, including wars with Pakistan and China and economic crises. Leaders like Lal Bahadur Shastri and Indira Gandhi had earlier appealed to people not to buy gold, but no government had made such a comprehensive ‘seven appeals’ to citizens.” The country is in shock,” Kejriwal said.The former Delhi chief minister said he had “three requests” from the Prime Minister after his recent remarks asking people to cut down on consumption and spending amid global economic uncertainty.He said, “I have three requests from the Prime Minister. He should tell the country what is the state of our economy today and what is expected to happen in the near future. There are a lot of rumors floating in the market today and this is not good for confidence in the economy.”Kejriwal linked the situation to the escalating Iran-US conflict and the broader West Asia crisis, but questioned why India’s response appeared more serious than that of other countries.He said, “We all know that this is happening because of the Iran-America war and the whole world is affected. But the government of any country has not made such an appeal to its citizens. This raises suspicion that perhaps the reason is something else.”The AAP leader also expressed concern that the middle class was being disproportionately burdened.Kejriwal said, “The middle class is very patriotic, but why is the entire burden being put on them only? The first sacrifice should have come from the government itself.”His comments come after PM Modi, speaking in Secunderabad on Sunday, urged citizens to change consumption habits in response to rising global economic pressures and disruptions caused by the West Asia conflict.The Prime Minister appealed to people to work from home wherever possible, reduce fuel consumption, avoid foreign travel for a year, buy indigenous products, cut down on the use of cooking oil, adopt natural farming and reduce gold purchases.Emphasizing the need to cut import dependence, PM Modi said every family should reduce consumption of edible oil and support natural farming to save foreign exchange and protect the environment.Highlighting India’s rising fertilizer import bill, the Prime Minister urged farmers to gradually reduce the use of chemical fertilizers.To deal with volatile fuel prices, PM Modi also called for greater use of metro systems and public transport, encouraged car-pooling, promoted railways to transport goods and pushed for widespread adoption of electric vehicles.The appeals come amid tensions in West Asia and a deepening global energy crisis caused by the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, a vital oil trade route in the Gulf region.

New Delhi: Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi on Tuesday launched a scathing attack on the Center after NTA’s decision to cancel the NEET-UG entrance exam, saying the hard work of students has been crushed by the “corrupt BJP regime”.“In a post on Twitter, Rahul hit out at the Centre, saying, “Amrit kaal has turned into poison kaal.”Rahul said, “NEET 2026 exam has been cancelled. The hard work, sacrifices and dreams of more than 22 lakh students have been crushed by this corrupt BJP regime. Some fathers took loans, some mothers sold their jewelery and lakhs of children stayed up all night studying.”“And in return they got paper leaks, government negligence and organized corruption in education,” he said. Congress The leader also termed the incident as a “crime against the future of the youth”.He said, “This is not just a failure – it is a crime against the future of the youth. Every time, paper mafias get away while honest students suffer the punishment. Now, lakhs of students will once again suffer the same mental stress, financial burden and uncertainty.”He said, “If one’s destiny is not decided by hard work but by money and connections, then what is the point of education? The Prime Minister’s so-called Amrit Kaal has become Poisson Kaal for the country.”comes after this National Testing Agency Canceled the NEET-UG 2026 exam held on May 3 and announced that the medical entrance exam will be re-conducted on new dates to be notified separately. The move came after allegations of a massive “estimate paper” leak that plunged the exam into a nationwide controversy.The government has also ordered a comprehensive Central Bureau of Investigation probe into alleged irregularities surrounding the examination, in which about 22.79 lakh students in India and abroad appeared.The development comes days after investigators uncovered evidence that a question set described by officials as a “guess paper” was circulated among candidates weeks before the exam and reportedly contained a large number of questions that closely resembled the actual NEET paper.“Based on the information examined by the NTA in coordination with the central agencies and the investigation findings shared by the law enforcement agencies, the National Testing Agency, with the approval of the Government of India, has decided to cancel the NEET-UG 2026 examination held on May 3, 2026 and re-conduct the examination on dates to be notified separately,” the agency posted on X.It said, “Combined with the inputs received by the NTA and the findings shared by the law enforcement agencies, it has been established that the current examination process cannot be allowed to persist. The dates of the re-conducted examination, along with the re-released admit card schedule, will be communicated through the official channels of the agency in the coming days.”

Nigerian-British man kidnaps son

British authorities have launched a search for a Nigerian-British man accused of kidnapping his five-year-old son from France to Nigeria after he was wrongly released from a London prison and may have fled to Britain within days.Ifedayo Adeyeye, 58, was released from London’s HMP Pentonville on April 21, despite being sentenced to an extra 12 months in prison the day before for repeatedly defying court orders to return his son, Lories, to his mother in France.According to court proceedings reported by Sky News, Adeyeye spent hours “loitering” in London after his release, reportedly enjoying dinner and drinks at a pub before traveling to Spain the next day. Police were reportedly informed about the jail disturbances only three days later, drawing sharp criticism from the court.Calling it a shocking state failure, High Court judge Mr Justice Hayden said prison authorities showed a “worrying lack of urgency”.The judge said, “If the police had been contacted immediately, perhaps, almost certainly, this could have been prevented. The public is entitled to expect much better than this.”

Kidnapping of a child during first night stay

The case centers on Lories N’Dozsé Adeyeye, a five-year-old boy born in France to Adeyeye and Claire N’Dozsé, a Cameroonian citizen.The couple met in Grenoble in 2020 and later separated. After DNA tests confirmed that Adeyeye was Loris’s biological father, a French court granted him supervised visitation rights, while full custody remained with the mother.The trouble began in July 2024 during Laurie’s first night staying with his father.Instead of returning the child, Adeyeye allegedly took her from France to England and then to Nigeria without the mother’s consent.When N’Djosse asked for answers, Adeyeye reportedly claimed that the child had gone on a “two-week vacation” with relatives. Investigators later discovered that he had secretly smuggled the lorries out of France.French authorities later issued an international arrest warrant against him on child kidnapping charges.UK court used rare powersThe case later took an extraordinary legal turn when the High Court of England ruled that it had the authority to order the return of the child, even though Laurie was outside Britain.Justice Hayden said the case was highly unusual because it involved three countries – France, Britain and Nigeria. The court also observed that Nigeria is not a signatory to the Hague Convention on International Child Abduction, complicating efforts to ensure the boy’s return.Despite this, the High Court exercised its “inherent jurisdiction” based on the Lories’ British nationality and ordered Adeyeye to return the child directly to France.After repeatedly ignoring court orders, Adeyeye was jailed for six months in January 2026 for contempt of court. While serving that sentence, he was found guilty of further breaches and on 20 April was sentenced to a further 12 months.However, prison officials reportedly failed to process the new sentence in time, resulting in his mistaken release the next morning.

Judge calls kidnapping an ‘act of cruelty’

Justice Hayden described Adeyeye as “arrogant and cunning”, “cold and calculating”, and said the kidnapping was “an act of cruelty that even this court rarely witnesses”.The judge said of Lauries, “He now finds himself in a foreign country, without his father or mother,” adding that the child’s entire world had been “taken away.”The judge also highlighted concerns raised during supervised visits to France before the abduction. Contact center staff reportedly described Adeyeye as aggressive, neglectful, and uninterested in understanding his son’s daily routine or emotional needs.

The suspect may have fled to Spain

During the latest hearing, the Metropolitan Police told the court that Adeyeye may have traveled to Spain on April 22, a day after his wrongful release. Spanish authorities have reportedly been alerted.The court heard that prison officials blamed a “communication failure” with the courts for the release, with Justice Hayden dismissing this claim as “completely baseless”.Lawyers representing Ms N’Jose accused British authorities of repeatedly failing the mother and child.His lawyer Chris Bryden said, “The state has failed him not only in securing the father’s release, but also by not notifying the Metropolitan Police immediately.”

Court removes anonymity to aid search

In a rare move, the High Court allowed the identification and images of both Adeyeye and Lawries to be published to help locate them.Family court proceedings involving children are usually kept confidential, but the judge ruled that transparency was justified in exceptional circumstances and in the public interest.Britain’s Justice Ministry said it was working with police to recapture Adeyeye and acknowledged growing concerns over the wrongful release of prisoners.Official figures show that 179 prisoners were wrongly released in England and Wales between April 2025 and March 2026.

New Delhi: Former Deputy Chief Minister Udhayanidhi Stalin on Tuesday reiterated his remarks calling for the “elimination” of Sanatan Dharma in the Tamil Nadu Assembly.During his address as Leader of the Opposition in the Tamil Nadu Assembly, Udhayanidhi said that the opposition “will not allow” any attempt to sideline the Tamil invocation song “Tamil Thai Vaazathu”.“Sanatan Dharma, which divides people, must be ended,” he said.Udhayanidhi was highlighting a specific grievance in relation to the recent swearing-in ceremony of the new government, alleging that the state anthem was pushed to third place in the sequence of events instead of being given traditional priority.“Such an incident, which happened during the swearing-in ceremony of your government, was a mistake and you should not allow it to happen again in this Assembly. We will not allow this,” he said.He further said that not only in the Assembly, but in any government program or event organized in Tamil Nadu, “Tamil Thai Vazhathu” should always be given primary place.The opposition leader said, “I request this government to ensure that this is never compromised. We must be very vigilant to protect our rights and traditions.”“In governance, DMK is the senior batch and we are ready to teach you,” he said in a light-hearted tone, referring to Chief Minister Vijay and Speaker Prabhakar. Vijay was also seen smiling during the comment.Udhayanidhi’s latest comment on Sanatan Dharma comes almost three years after his similar statement, which had sparked a major political storm across India. He had then said that Sanatan Dharma is against the idea of ​​social justice and it needs to be abolished.In the Tamil Nadu Assembly elections, Udhayanidhi’s Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam suffered a crushing defeat at the hands of Vijay’s Tamilaga Vetri Kazhagam. While the TVK won 108 seats in its first election, the DMK managed to secure only 59 seats.