File photo: Rahul Gandhi

New Delhi: The BJP on Saturday stepped up its attack on Congress leader Rahul Gandhi by posting a series of allegations regarding his foreign trips over the past 22 years, claiming there was a huge mismatch between his declared income and expenditure on foreign trips.In a series of posts on Twitter, the BJP claimed that Rahul made “54 traceable foreign trips” to destinations including London, New York, Italy, Germany, Qatar, Vietnam, Cambodia, Maldives and Dubai, while also describing it as a “secret Oman trip”.The ruling party alleged that the total estimated cost of these trips was around Rs 60 crore, which included first class travel, private charter, five-star hotels, entry expenses and security arrangements.The BJP further claimed that the former Congress president’s declared income in the last decade was around Rs 11 crore.The party said a Southeast Asia trip in 2015 reportedly cost Rs 4.5 crore, which it claimed was “5.2 times” its annual declared income for that year.‘Who paid for your globetrotting?’, BJP further questioned Gandhi.

BJP raised questions on FCRA, tax and disclosures

In a series of detailed posts, the BJP questioned the source of funds behind Rahul’s foreign trip and alleged possible violation of the Foreign Contribution Regulation Act (FCRA) and income tax laws.The party claimed that no public records exist showing approval from the Union Home Ministry under Section 6 of the FCRA, which mandates MPs and political functionaries to seek prior permission before accepting foreign hospitality.BJP said in one of its posts, “Foreign sources footing the bill for an Indian opposition leader at a sensitive time? This is a serious violation of the FCRA.”The party also alleged that there was no reflection of travel expenses in the Congress MP’s income tax returns, Lokpal declarations or asset disclosures, questioning the absence of bank statements, foreign exchange records and expenditure details.The BJP further cited a CRPF communication dated September 10, 2025, alleging that many of Rahul’s foreign trips were carried out without disclosure of mandatory security protocols. The party has linked the issue to Gandhi’s recent visit to Oman earlier this month.

BJP leaders demanded clarification

On Friday, Union Minister Kiren Rijiju had described the allegations as “very serious” and urged the leader of the opposition in the Lok Sabha to disclose details of his foreign trips to the concerned authorities.“My request to Rahul Gandhi and the Congress party is to please follow the rules and provide the requisite information to the authorities,” Rijiju told reporters.He said MPs are required to inform the home and external affairs ministries as well as the Lok Sabha or Rajya Sabha secretariat about foreign tours, especially when foreign hospitality is involved.Rijiju also cited Section 6 of the FCRA Act, which said there are provisions for punishment if foreign hospitality is accepted without informing the authorities.

Congress rejected the allegations

Earlier, Congress had rejected BJP’s allegations as politically motivated. Congress leader Jairam Ramesh said the saffron party was trying to divert attention from the economic and foreign policy issues facing the country.Meanwhile, Congress shared an AI-generated video of PM Modi and raised questions on his foreign travel expenses.Another Congress leader Manickam Tagore accused the BJP of running a “humiliating campaign” instead of addressing unemployment, inflation and border concerns.

Russian President Vladimir Putin will visit China on May 19 for a two-day visit, the Kremlin announced on Saturday, soon after US President Donald Trump’s high-profile visit to Beijing ended.According to a Kremlin statement, Putin will hold talks with Chinese President Xi Jinping on ways to “further strengthen the comprehensive partnership and strategic cooperation” between Moscow and Beijing.The two leaders are also expected to exchange views on “key international and regional issues” and sign a joint declaration at the end of the talks.Putin is also scheduled to meet Chinese Premier Li Kiang to discuss economic and trade cooperation between the two countries.

This visit is after Trump’s visit to Beijing

The Kremlin’s announcement came just a day after Trump concluded the first visit to China by a sitting US president in nearly a decade. The visit was dominated by discussions on Taiwan, trade relations and the ongoing Iran conflict.Taiwan emerged as one of the most sensitive issues during Trump’s meetings with Xi. The Chinese leader reportedly warned that mishandling the Taiwan issue could lead Washington and Beijing to conflict. Trump later said aboard Air Force One that he had not yet decided whether to move forward with a major US arms package to Taiwan after hearing Xi’s objections.Trump also said he and Xi discussed Iran and the Strait of Hormuz, with the US president claiming that Chinese leaders agreed that Iran should not have nuclear weapons and that the strategic waterway should remain open.

China-Russia relations in focus

China has maintained close ties with Russia since Moscow launched a military invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. While Beijing has repeatedly called for peace talks, it has refrained from condemning Russia’s actions and continues to describe itself as a neutral party.China has also denied Western accusations that it is providing Russia with arms or military equipment for the Ukraine conflict. Instead, Beijing has accused Western countries of prolonging the war by continuing to arm Ukraine.China has become Russia’s major economic partner in recent years, especially after Western sanctions isolated Moscow from many global markets. Beijing remains one of the biggest buyers of Russian fossil fuels, helping keep Russia’s economy afloat amid sanctions pressure.Trump’s visit to China saw both Washington and Beijing talk about building more “constructive” and stable relations, although major differences over Taiwan, trade and geopolitical tensions remain unresolved.

New Delhi: Delhi-based businessman and husband of Congress leader Priyanka Gandhi, robert vadraDelhi’s Rouse Avenue Court granted bail on Saturday. Enforcement DirectorateThe money laundering case is related to the controversial Shikohpur land deal of Gurugram.The court granted him relief on a personal bond of Rs 50,000 with one surety and fixed the next hearing in the case for July 10.The case pertains to alleged irregularities in a land transaction in Shikohpur village in Haryana and is being investigated by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).Speaking to reporters after getting bail, Vadra expressed his faith in the judiciary and raised questions on the functioning of the agency.“I believe in the judicial system of this country. I know that the ED is being managed by the government and the ED will continue to run on the instructions of the government. So, this is not fair on the part of the ED. But I believe in the judicial system of the country. I am here, I have nothing to hide. So, I will always be here and answer all the questions. Whatever formalities there are, I will complete them. So, it is all good… If we are winning the elections, if we “Doing well and people, I still want my family, by default I have to deal with it. I have the ability to cope and I have nothing to hide.”The case pertains to a 2008 land transaction in which Vadra’s company, Skylight Hospitality Pvt Ltd, purchased about 3.5 acres of land in Gurugram’s Shikohpur village from Omkareshwar Properties for about Rs 7.5 crore. The land was later sold to real estate giant DLF for a much higher amount after the mutation process and grant of commercial license became the subject of investigation.The Haryana government had earlier ordered a probe into the deal, focusing on possible irregularities in land licensing and financial gains arising from the transaction. Later the ED initiated a money laundering investigation on the basis of the crime registered in the case.Vadra, husband of Congress MP Priyanka Gandhi Vadra, has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing and said the allegations against him are politically motivated.

CSK lost against LSG by 7 wickets (Image: IPL/BCCI)

Chennai Super Kings batting coach michael hussey He admitted that the five-time champions now have no margin for error after their defeat to Lucknow Supergiants left their IPL 2026 playoff hopes hanging in the balance.CSK suffered a huge blow on Friday when LSG chased down 188 runs with ease thanks to a blistering inning of 90 runs in 38 balls. Michelle Marsh On a live Ikana Stadium surface. After this defeat, Chennai is left with 12 points from 13 matches, which means that to qualify for the playoffs, it will now have to win both the remaining league games, as well as depend on other results.Despite the difficult situation, Hussey remained optimistic and said that the team would treat each remaining match as a knockout match.“Well, I mean, I really like this time of the tournament because it feels like every game is like a final, you know, and we are in that position now,” Hussey said, adding that CSK now need to win both of their remaining games as well as rely on some other results to go their way.“We have to win our last two matches. I mean, I haven’t studied the table that closely. Yes, there are a lot of teams competing for probably the last few spots in the top four,” he said.“This is where (the tournament stage) the pressure is really on everyone, not just on us, but on all the other teams as well. And you can see some strange things happening. So we still have a chance… we still believe we can get through it,” he said during the post-match press conference.Speaking during the post-match presentation after the match, Gaikwad remained calm despite the setback and insisted that the qualification scenario is “simple” for his team to move forward.“Okay, the first challenge is facing Chennai. It’s a long flight. After that, just make sure that we come back and improve on what areas we need to improve and yes, try to adapt and assess the situations as quickly as possible and it is a simple calculation for us. No matter how many games we play, we win every game. So I guess nothing is simple. I mean, it’s simple, nothing complicated. It’s very easy for us here. Nothing to worry about. Just make sure we have a good day. “Whoever has a good day, count it and hope we change things,” Gaikwad said.

When the Aura bells start ringing in the city, you just know it Tom Cruise. The stylish actor had stepped out of his helicopter and landed at a London helipad earlier this week. Recently, soon after the announcement of the production of the blockbuster film’s threequel, ‘Top Gun 3’, the 63-year-old star was seen all in black as rain covered the sky.

Tom Cruise steps out in all black in London

There was excitement on social media apps after the box-office hit ‘Top Gun: Maverick’ was confirmed to be getting a sequel. However, according to People Magazine, the ‘Jerry Maguire’ actor has been hopping through intense movies and was spotted riding to the United Kingdom on May 14, 2026. Clad in a black outfit, the actor wore a collared black jacket and black slacks with subtle shades. He was seen greeting the airport staff and holding his umbrella even during light drizzle.

Tom Cruise returns to ‘Top Gun’ franchise

Earlier this year, it was revealed that Tom Cruise would be taking to the skies once again during a presentation at CinemaCon. However, according to The Guardian, no other returning cast members have been confirmed for the action drama. “We’re thinking and talking about a lot of different stories and what we can do and what’s possible,” he told an Australian show Today last year. “It took me 35 years to figure out Top Gun: Maverick. So, there’s all these things we’re working on, we’re discussing Days of Thunder and Top Gun: Maverick.”

Tom Cruise signs another film?

While whispers are growing about Tom Cruise’s next film, he is reportedly in talks on another spy film titled ‘Doppelganger’. Jeff Snyder’s entertainment newspaper, The InSnyder, claimed that the actor spoke to the writer Anish Chaganti.

Galileo Galilei (Image: Wikipedia)

People often assume that old quotes survive because they sound wise. Sometimes they survive because they seem uncomfortably accurate.Citation: “There are people who reason well, but they far outnumber those who reason poorly.” This line of Galileo Galilei seems to be one of those lines.This doesn’t sound poetic. It’s not even warm or comfortable. If anything, there’s a slight sense of frustration in the sentence, almost like someone who has spent years watching intelligent conversations drown out noise.And honestly, many people today probably understand that sentiment immediately.The strange thing is that Galileo lived centuries before smartphones, social media debates, viral misinformation and endless online debates. Yet this quote somehow fits modern life almost perfectly. Every day, people confidently debate topics they barely understand. Rumors spread faster than facts. Emotional reactions constantly override careful thinking.Galileo may not have predicted the Internet, but he clearly understood human behavior.That part never changes much.

Quote of the Day by Galileo Galilei

“There are people who argue well, but they far outnumber those who argue poorly.”

Why does this quote from Galileo suddenly feel like it’s everywhere online?

In recent years, this line has begun to circulate more frequently online, perhaps because people feel mentally exhausted by the sheer volume of bad arguments surrounding them on a daily basis.Open almost any social media platform, and patterns are immediately visible.People react even before reading it completely. Headlines become opinions. Short clips replace the reference. Anger spreads faster than patience. Confidence is always mistaken for intelligence. Sometimes the loudest person in the room knows the least, yet dominates the conversation because certainty feels persuasive.Galileo’s quote sums them all up with great simplicity.He is essentially saying that thoughtful logic exists, but irrational thinking numerically overwhelms it. Not because good thinkers disappear completely. Simply because emotional thinking often spreads more naturally among larger groups.That observation seems harsh. This also sounds familiar.

Galileo understood something uncomfortable about human nature

Galileo Galilei spent much of his life challenging widely accepted beliefs about the universe. That experience probably shaped the way he viewed public argument.Galileo supported the idea that the Earth revolved around the Sun, which was fiercely opposed by many powerful institutions during his lifetime. For many people at that time, evidence mattered less than tradition, authority, and emotional certainty.That struggle changed his life permanently.He eventually faced trial by the Roman Inquisition and remained under house arrest for years. Imagine experiencing this personally: carefully presenting evidence while vast groups reject it because the conclusions seem uncomfortable or threatening.After going through this, his quote suddenly seems less pejorative and more observational.Galileo saw firsthand how poorly people can reason when pride, fear, ideology, or social pressure are involved.

This line seems strangely personal now

What makes this quote powerful today is that people no longer have to deal with bad logic occasionally. They face it constantly.A person can wake up, check their phone for five minutes, and see misinformation, emotional outcry, conspiracy theories, manipulated statistics, and outright self-indulgent nonsense even before breakfast. Over time, this creates fatigue. Many people feel mentally exhausted, not because the information is there, but because it requires constant effort to separate good logic from bad logic.Galileo’s quote captures that weariness almost perfectly.This sentence sounds less like philosophy and more like someone’s silent admission: “Yes, this has always been a problem.”

Why is it really hard to reason well?

Most people believe that arguments happen naturally. Galileo seems to disagree.Good reasoning requires patience. It demands evidence, self-control, and a willingness to question personal assumptions. Humans struggle with this more than they usually admit. People quickly become emotionally attached to ideas. Once this happens, changing perspective feels uncomfortable because it involves identity.This is where bad logic often begins.One stops to ask, “Is this true?” Instead they begin to ask, “How do I defend what I already believe?”They are completely different mental processes. Galileo seems to be deeply aware of that distinction.

The Internet rewards emotions over logic

One reason this quote seems unusually modern is that online culture often rewards emotional reaction rather than thoughtful analysis.Fast responses perform well online. Anger also performs well. Careful nuances usually do not occur.People who share emotional certainty attract attention faster than individuals who express uncertainty or complexity. Algorithms reward participation, not intellectual discipline. This creates an environment where bad arguments spread faster because emotionally satisfying explanations spread faster than complex truths.Galileo clearly lived centuries before algorithms came into existence, yet his observations still land squarely inside modern digital culture.Maybe that’s why young audiences keep searching for this quote again and again.

Galileo was not alone in attacking the intelligence system.

This quote is interesting because Galileo does not simply divide people into “smart” and “stupid.” The issue itself is one of logic.A highly educated person can still reason badly emotionally. History proves this time and again. Intelligent people sometimes defend irrational beliefs because ego, politics, fear, loyalty, or pride distort their thinking. Meanwhile, ordinary people without formal education can reason carefully because they remain curious, patient, and open-minded.Galileo seems to be more interested in intellectual honesty than in raw intelligence. That distinction matters.A person can remember vast amounts of information even when approaching questions emotionally rather than rationally. Good argument requires humility, which many people struggle to practice consistently.

Why does a crowd often make an argument worse?

Hidden within Galileo’s words is another inconvenient truth: groups do not become intelligent simply because they are large.People often assume that the majority opinion is the truth. History repeatedly shows otherwise.At one time the entire society believed in scientifically wrong ideas for centuries. Public panic, conspiratorial movements, propaganda campaigns, and moral hysteria all show how irrational group thinking can yield under pressure.Galileo experienced that reality personally.He observed that institutions and large groups reject evidence because accepting it threatens existing beliefs. That experience likely shaped his understanding of how emotionally fragile rational thinking can become when fear or power enter the equation.

This quote seems almost sarcastic

What makes this line memorable is its tone. Galileo looks tired.Not dramatic. Not furious. Just quietly know that most of the time illogical thinking far outnumbers careful reasoning. That understated disappointment gives the quote personality. The reader can almost imagine someone saying this after losing patience during a meaningless argument.And honestly, a lot of people today can probably relate to that mood. Especially online.The Internet has created endless opportunities for debate, while simultaneously narrowing attention spans and rewarding oversimplification. Discussions often devolve into tribal shouting rather than genuine curiosity. People defend “their side” emotionally rather than openly examining the facts.Galileo’s statement fits that environment almost exactly.

Why do people keep sharing this quote even after centuries?

Some historical quotations survive primarily because schools continue to teach them. It survives because it still feels emotionally useful.Readers now encounter bad logic constantly in daily life. At work. Online. Politically. Socially. Even in normal conversation. Galileo’s words provide a strange reassurance as they remind people that this problem is not entirely new.Man has always struggled with rational thinking.Technology changed. Human psychology mostly did not do this.That continuity probably explains why the quote keeps returning online every few months. People read it and immediately recognize that there is something true in it.

Other famous quotes from Galileo Galilei

Why do Galileo’s observations still matter?

The uncomfortable thing about this quote is that it denies easy optimism.Galileo is not saying that everyone eventually becomes rational through education or progress. He seems to recognize that flawed reasoning is deeply human. Emotional thinking comes naturally. Reasoning carefully requires effort, discipline, and a willingness to temporarily feel uncertainty.Many people object to that inconvenience.Yet despite the pessimistic edge of the quote, there is still some strange hope within it. Galileo acknowledges that some people argue well. Thoughtful thinking exists even when surrounded by noise. Curiosity still exists. Evidence still matters. Rational people still continue to ask hard questions despite the public confusion around them.Maybe this is enough. Or maybe it always has been.