The internet is once again talking about Clavicular, although this time it has nothing to do with her workout routine or viral lookmaxing content. The 20-year-old influencer, whose real name is Braden Peters, is the center of an intense debate after he looked very different during a recent livestream after he decided to stop taking testosterone and other substances.What started as a conversation about physical changes quickly turned into a larger discussion about health, fertility, and the immense pressures that come with online beauty culture. Some viewers mocked her new look, while others praised her for making a decision that could have long-term benefits beyond social media approval.

Testosterone selection of claviculars gives rise to serious lookmaxing debate

Over the years, Clavicular became one of the most recognized figures in the Looksmaxing community, a corner of the Internet dedicated to maximizing physical attractiveness. His content often included extreme workouts, physical transformations, and experiments to look better.But that picture began to change earlier this year. The influencer was hospitalized in April after serious health concerns and was then questioned about his lifestyle which affected his online persona.Reflecting on the incident, he told followers:“Just got home. That was hard.He continued:“All substances are just a coping mechanism for feeling neurotic in public, but obviously it’s not a real solution. “The worst part of tonight was my face coming down from the life-support mask.Clavicular soon made it clear that he wanted to move away from substance abuse completely.“I’m not going to take any other substances for some time, hopefully forever.”This statement was a major turning point for a creationist whose public image had long been associated with chemical enhancement and physical conditioning.

Clavicular’s transformation causes mixed reactions on the web

Clavicular’s appearance on a livestream in late May drew immediate comments from viewers about the difference in her body. Social media users posted side-by-side photos of what he looks like now and before shots from the height of his transformation journey.Some of the reactions were brutal. One viral comment joked: “From Superman to Clark Kent in 28 days.” Others speculated that being off testosterone may have affected his muscular look. There were also a number of commentators who speculated that fertility issues may have been involved in his decision, but Clavicular has not publicly confirmed this as a primary factor.Not everyone joined in the criticism. Many supporters said the conversation itself points to a troubling aspect of Internet fitness culture. He added: “Ridiculousness to someone for looking more natural after using performance enhancing drugs only sets unrealistic expectations.”But beneath the memes and commentary, Clavicular’s recent transformation has sparked an important conversation about health, body image, and the personal toll of pursuing perfection online. For many observers that interaction may be more meaningful than any change in appearance.

Questions about running back Josh Jacobs and impact tackle Ash Kash intensified this week after the Green Bay Packers running back was arrested following a domestic disturbance investigation. The case remains active, but attention has already shifted to a cryptic social media post shared by Kash just a day before news of the arrest became public. What once looked like a high-profile offseason affair is now under a far more serious spotlight, with both the NFL and the Packers monitoring developments closely as legal questions continue to grow surrounding one of Green Bay’s top offensive players.

What did Ash Kash’s post mean after Josh Jacobs’ arrest?

Kash and Jacobs had been publicly linked for months. Fans first linked the two when Jacobs posted a beach video on Snapchat earlier this year showing him hanging out with a woman while on vacation. Speculation ran rampant on the internet when Kash later uploaded swimsuit photos and eventually confirmed that she was in St. Barts with the Packers star.That relationship timeline is now being reconsidered for a different reason.On May 22, Kash posted onAccording to law enforcement records, the 28-year-old man faces five domestic abuse charges, including assault, disorderly conduct, criminal damage to property, strangulation and suffocation and menacing a victim. Investigators have not publicly identified the alleged victim, and police say the case will continue.After the news spread, the Packers reacted cautiously.“We are aware of the matter involving Josh Jacobs,” a Packers spokesperson said. “As this is an ongoing legal situation, we will withhold further comment.”NFL spokesman Brian McCarthy said “We are aware of the report and have been in contact with the club.”The timing couldn’t be worse for Green Bay. Organized team activities began Tuesday, and Jacobs entered the offseason expected to remain the focal point of the Packers’ rushing attack. He followed up a strong 2024 campaign with another productive season last year, tallying 929 rushing yards and 13 touchdowns. Before arriving in Green Bay, Jacobs built one of the league’s better resumes with the Raiders, including a 2022 season where he led the NFL with 1,653 rushing yards and earned All-Pro honors.Now, football discussions seem secondary.Even without formal league discipline, the NFL’s personal conduct policy could put Jacobs under heavy scrutiny if the allegations move forward. Teams rarely ignore cases that attract public attention at this level, especially when allegations of domestic violence are involved. For the Packers, the uncertainty extends beyond the courtroom and to the future of the player they expect to find offense again this season.

Adin Ross has decided he will not attend the upcoming UFC White House event after hearing rumors that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu would be there. The popular streamer recently shared the update during the Kick livestream and said that he would love to stay at home and watch the fight with his father. Although reports of Netanyahu attending the event are still unconfirmed, the news is already drawing strong reactions online as preparations continue for the historic UFC show outside the White House.The event, also known as UFC Freedom 250, is scheduled to take place on June 16, 2026, at the White House grounds in Washington, DC. This card is part of the celebrations commemorating the 250th anniversary of the United States of America. The date also falls on President Donald Trump’s 80th birthday, making the event even bigger politically and publicly.During his livestream, Aiden Ross addressed fans directly, asking if he would be joining the card after receiving the first invitation. Ross made it clear that he had no plans to leave.“I’m not leaving. I told you guys I’m not going,” Ross said on stream. “Brother, I would prefer not to go. I would rather watch it at home with my father.”Reports about Benjamin Netanyahu possibly attending a UFC event first surfaced earlier this week via Fight TV. The outlet claimed that Netanyahu was interested in watching Cyril Gane face Alex Pereira from cageside. However, neither the White House nor UFC officials have officially confirmed those reports so far.

Adin Ross reacts to UFC building White House cage as Donald Trump and Dana White prepare for historic event

Despite questions over the attendance of guests, work is progressing rapidly at the White House ahead of the event. On Wednesday, workers were seen building the frame of the UFC cage on the South Lawn. Crews were also preparing staging areas and large domed structures for fans and production teams. President Donald Trump has already described UFC Freedom 250 as the “biggest event” in UFC history. According to BBC report, organizing this event may cost around $60 million.UFC President Dana White also shared new information earlier this month. Speaking to the BBC, White said that around 4,300 people would have been sitting on the South Lawn during the fight. Most of those seats are expected to go to members of the military.Meanwhile, approximately 85,000 free viewing tickets are expected to be available to fans at nearby Ellipse Park. UFC officials have reportedly confirmed that there will be no regular public ticket sales for the event.While talking to reporters, Trump also talked about the public’s demand for tickets.“I’ve never seen anyone want anything as much as people want those tickets,” Trump said.There are still a few weeks left for the event, but the politics, celebrity appearances and buzz about the huge White House setup are already drawing major attention on the card. Meanwhile, Aiden Ross has made it clear that he would prefer to stay away from the scene and watch the fight from home instead.

New Delhi: Ten days after the President issued an ordinance to increase the number of judges in the Supreme Court to 38, the SC collegium led by CJI Surya Kant on Wednesday recommended the Central government to appoint four HC chief justices – Sheel Nagu, Shri Chandrashekhar, Sanjeev Sachdeva, Arun Palli – and senior lawyer V Mohana as SC judges.With the appointment, Mohana will become the second woman after Justice Indu Malhotra to be appointed as an SC judge directly from the bar. The recommendations were finalized after a stormy preliminary discussion that lasted till after midnight at the CJI’s residence on May 22.However, the names were finalized on Wednesday by the collegium comprising CJI Kant and Justices Vikram Nath, JK Maheshwari, BV Nagarathna and MM Sundaresh after removing those names on which there were major differences of opinion. Upon appointment of these five as judges, the strength of the Supreme Court will increase from the present 32 to 37, leaving only one vacancy.Punjab and Haryana HC Chief Justice Nagu was part of the three-member in-house investigation committee constituted by then CJI Sanjiv Khanna for the discovery of a huge amount of cash in a half-burnt state at the residence of then Delhi HC judge Yashwant Verma in March last year. Justice Verma has resigned from the post of judge of Allahabad HC.Justice Nagu was appointed as a judge of MP HC in May 2011 and then as CJ of Punjab and Haryana HC on July 9, 2024. As an SC judge, his tenure will be three and a half years and he is scheduled to retire on December 31, 2029.Mohana is a first generation lawyer and became an advocate on record in 1996. He was designated as senior counsel by the SC in April 2015. Hailing from Coimbatore, she practiced law for over 37 years after obtaining her law degree in 1988.Bombay HC Chief Justice Chandrashekhar will have less than four years’ tenure in the SC and will retire on May 24, 2030. He was part of the Judges Inquiry Committee appointed by the Speaker of the Lok Sabha which was probing the alleged misconduct of Justice Yashwant Verma. MP HC Chief Justice Sachdeva’s tenure on appointment to the SC will be three and a half years. Chief Justice Palli of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh HC will have a tenure of three years and four months upon his appointment as an SC judge.

Former batsman Aakash Chopra has asked the selectors to be patient with Vaibhav Suryavanshi and not include him in the national team right now. Suryavanshi continues to make headlines Sensational inning of 97 runs on 29 balls in the eliminator Against SRH at Mullanpur on Wednesday, May 28.

SRH vs RR: highlighted | Achievement:

This means that Suryavanshi has scored 680 runs this season at an average of 45.33 and a strike-rate of 242.86. His knock on Wednesday forced people to talk like this Sachin Tendulkar and others shouting. Michael Vaughan was one of them, and he said India needed to pick him.

However, Chopra said that everyone needs to proceed with caution. The former batsman said that although his performances need attention, Suryavanshi should not come into the Indian team at the expense of Abhishek Sharma and Sanju Samson, who have done well to cement their places.

“We are still 2 years away from the next World Cup. There will still be time. Yes, it’s exciting. It’s something you can’t possibly ignore because IPL This is India’s best T20 tournament. So if someone is just breaking records, breaking records, you have to take it seriously, and this kid is special. It doesn’t have any message. But then you don’t make changes just for the sake of making changes because someone else did it well,” Chopra said.

“It is very easy for someone to go out; you have to fail in that exam. If someone is already a topper, how can you change the topper because you think someone else will actually get higher grades? I mean, he is the topper.”

‘Suryavanshi is not Indian cricket, he is a part of it’

Samson and Abhishek also performed well in the IPL this season, scoring 477 runs and 563 runs respectively. Chopra said that if Suryavanshi is promoted early, a weak patch for him will mean there will be pressure on the selectors to pick the new player on the block.

“You are talking about Abhishek Sharma and Sanju Samson. You are not replacing them now because if you do that, I can give you in writing in two or three years, and Vaibhav Suryavanshi is going through a bad phase, you are going to follow the same principle.”

“The next kid in town, you would want to step him up to this level. So Ajit Agarkar, RP Singh, Pragyan Ojha will face a lot of scrutiny and pressure, but they need to do what is right for Indian cricket, and represent Indian cricket.

Chopra said, “He is not Indian cricket. I mean he is a part of Indian cricket and I think none of the selectors have hidden that fact and they will do the right thing, but it should not happen tomorrow. It may take time. He is 20 years ahead of him, so there is no hurry.”

Right after the IPL, Suryavanshi will be seen in India A colors as the team tours Sri Lanka for a tri-series.

ipl 2026 | ipl schedule | ipl points table | ipl player stats | purple cap | orange cap | ipl video | cricket news | live score

– ends

New Delhi: In a significant step towards India building its own stealth 5th generation fighter jet, the Defense Ministry on Wednesday issued a request for proposal (RFP) to three shortlisted private players for the development and production of the Advanced Medium Combat Aircraft (AMCA), which once developed will take on the US F35 Lightning II and Russian Su-57 stealth fighters. The budget for the AMCA prototype phase is Rs 15,000 crore.The AMCA will be a medium-weight, multi-role, twin-engine stealth combat aircraft that will be designed and developed based on operational requirements. Indian Air Force (IAF).For the first time, Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) will not be part of a major fighter jet programme, as the defense PSU is already associated with the 4.5-generation Tejas fighter program and has two big orders for Tejas pending with it from the Indian Air Force.The shortlisted bidders include Tata Advanced Systems Ltd, Bharat Forge in an arrangement with Larsen & Toubro and Bharat Earth Movers Ltd in collaboration with Bharat Electronics Ltd.After the three companies give their responses to the RFP, the selection process for the project is likely to be completed in 4 to 5 months. As per the RFP, the bidding process will begin on June 11 and interested bidders will have to submit their final presentations by the end of next month. Bids will be opened on 28th July.The selected private defense flagship unit will work with the Aeronautical Development Agency (ADA), which operates under the Defense Ministry, to develop five prototypes of the aircraft. IAF is emphasizing on AMCA project considering its long term requirement.The AMCA will be produced under the design and expertise of ADA of DRDO. Under the RFP, bidders will be required to support flight test and type certification activities for AMCA. While the first AMCA prototype is likely to be completed by early 2027, the first flight of the multi-role fighter will take place between 2028-29. Its serial production will begin in the mid-2030s.Once the prototype is approved and the Cabinet Committee on Security gives its nod, the AMCA will be constructed at the upcoming integration and flight test complex in Andhra Pradesh, the foundation stone of which was laid by Defense Minister Rajnath Singh and CM Chandrababu Naidu a few days ago.Featuring super-cruise, internal weapons bays and advanced AI, the AMCA is expected to have an operational ceiling of 55,000 feet and carry 1,500 kg of weapons in its bays, while a further 5,500 kg externally.On May 27, 2025, the Defense Minister approved the execution model of the AMCA program involving private companies. About 20 days later, expressions of interest (EOI) were invited from private firms for the development of AMCA.

Candace Owens and Blake Neff’s latest social media confrontation quickly gained attention after the conservative commentator challenged Neff to prove a major claim related to it. charlie kirk and his wife Erica Kirk. The exchange began after Owens responded to an article published by The Bulwark, which discussed public reactions to the idea of ​​her potentially running for president in the future. Owens shared the article on X and claimed that President Donald Trump’s attempt to publicly embarrass her “had the opposite desired effect.” The article included comments from people who said they would consider supporting Owens if she ever ran for president.That post later caught the attention of political commentator Blake Neff, who responded, writing, “You should run. I think the whole country would benefit from learning more about who you really are.”Rather than address the comment directly, Owens shifted the conversation to an old controversy involving Charlie Kirk and the leadership of Turning Point USA. He challenged Neff to show proof that Charlie Kirk had officially chosen Erica Kirk as his successor.Owens wrote on

Candace Owens Revisits Charlie Kirk and Erica Kirk’s Inheritance Claims During Blake Neff Exchange

This is not the first time Candace Owens has publicly questioned Blake Neff on the same topic. In April, Neff posted on X that there was “no doubt” as to who would ultimately be Charlie Kirk’s successor at TPUSA. Owens immediately pushed back and asked her to provide evidence that Charlie had publicly named Erica Kirk as her replacement.After this the disagreements became personal and acrimonious.In a response, Blake Neff wrote, “Candace, we didn’t bother playing this because we know psychopathic predators like you don’t care what is true or false and normal evidentiary logic has no effect on you.”Neff also claimed that he no longer believed that “any good-faith negotiation” was possible with Owens. He later compared him to “a maniac who brandishes knives and yells at people on the subway.”Owens fired back shortly thereafter and mocked Neff’s comments. He wrote, “Please just say April Fools’, brother. This is so stupid it hurts, but you have a few hours left to claim it was a joke.”Social media users divided back and forth. Some users defended Owens and questioned why Neff would not release the alleged video if it existed. Others criticized Owens and accused him of creating unnecessary drama online.Erica Kirk has also faced criticism online since stepping into a larger leadership role associated with TPUSA after rumors of Charlie Kirk’s death and succession discussions circulated online. Public figures including Candace Owens, Jennifer Welch, and Jason Whitlock have all publicly questioned their positions within the organization.

New Delhi: The Election Commission As directed by the Supreme Court, the list of deleted voters will be forwarded as part of the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) in 13 states – primarily those classified as ‘Others’, as distinct from Absent, Transferred, Dead, Duplicate (ASDD) voters and thus, excluded from the rolls on the basis of ‘doubtful’ citizenship as well as the decision, during which they are in their mapping with the rolls from the previous SIR. Could not explain the logical inconsistencies – to the competent authority under the Citizenship Act, 1955, to investigate his citizenship.Election Commission officials welcomed the decision, saying that the SIR and all its processes, including seeking further clarification from voters on the basis of logical anomalies – mismatch with father’s name, gender mismatch, being above 45 years of age but never enrolled, being one of more than six children of the same parent, age difference of less than 15 years or more than 50 years with the mapped parent and those of the mapped grandparents. including a difference of less than 40 years – and eliminating those who fail to explain the discrepancies. Validated by SC. Those challenging the SIR had previously called these logical inconsistencies an exercise in disenfranchisement.Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar said, “The Election Commission was, is and will always be with the voters.”According to EC data from a dozen states covered in the second round of SIR, around 6.5 crore ASDD voters were removed. More than 12.7 lakh people were excluded from the list and classified as ‘others’, who sources said are basically “suspected illegal immigrants”. Another 63.2 lakh were removed through Form 7 and decision; These include more than 27 lakh people who were removed from the Bengal list after their appeals were rejected by the authorities.The SC’s direction to the EC to hand over ‘doubtful’ citizenship cases under the Citizenship Act to the competent authority was already in the SIR order. The order directed Electoral Registration Officers (EROs) and Assistant EROs to “forward cases of suspected foreign nationals to the ‘competent authority’ under the Citizenship Act, 1955”. Sources said the competent authority is the Foreigner Registration Office (FRO) or Foreigner Regional Registration Office (FRRO), and the ERO/SDM can refer ‘suspicious’ cases to them for verification. If the citizenship is verified, the FRO/FRRO can refer the case back to the EC authorities who will include the person in the list. Otherwise, the FRO/FRRO may order the suspect to be sent to a custody or holding centre.

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Wednesday agreed to examine the validity of CBSE’s recent policy mandating three languages ​​for Class 9, two of which should be Indian languages, which parents termed a sure recipe for chaos and confusion in the absence of trained teachers, requiring textbooks and denying students a choice.Several lawyers, including Mukul Rohatgi, Kapil Sibal and Shraddha Deshmukh, made repeated requests to stay the implementation of the policy, which came into effect from July 1. But a bench comprising CJI Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and Vipul M Pancholi rejected the request and said, “The objective (of the three-language policy) may be salutary, but we understand the difficulty faced by the students in the absence of infrastructure and teaching support.“The SC did not agree with the argument that the three-language scheme impacts federalism, but said it could be examined on the basis of rationality in view of infrastructure constraints.The bench considered a batch of petitions filed by parents and teachers from the National Capital Region and Chennai, seeking a comprehensive affidavit dealing with all the issues raised by the petitioners related to the implementation of the policy, and said it would devote a day to its decision in the second week of July.“There is a ray of hope because there are no examinations right now,” the CJI said, but he also recognized the importance of the pleas about the hardship and inconvenience faced by students in the absence of trained teachers and textbooks in Indian languages. SC issued notice to Education Ministry, CBSE and NCERT.Additional SG Aishwarya Bhati said the policy has been formulated after much deliberation and the court should wait for the response of students after its implementation before deciding on its validity.Sibal said the emphasis on the two native languages ​​denied students the opportunity to make an informed choice and raised issues of federalism.Justice Bagchi immediately responded and said that there is no issue of federalism as more and more languages ​​have been added to the Eighth Schedule by designating them as national languages. “But it could be an issue of unfairness when trained teachers and books are not available in schools,” he said.The main petition, filed through advocate Deshmukh by 17 parents and two teachers of children studying in CBSE-affiliated schools in Delhi, Noida, Gurgaon and Chennai, said the new policy is contrary to the CBSE’s April 9 notification which clearly assured that the third language “will not be implemented at the Class IX level till the academic session 2029-30”.However, the change in the policy of three languages, two of which should be Indian – once the session for 2026-27 begins on May 15, allocation of languages ​​and timetable is finalized – will cause irreversible harm to thousands of Class IX students and take away the livelihood of many teachers skilled in teaching foreign languages, as they will have to make way for teachers who can teach regional languages, the plea said.It said the unavailability of textbooks and teaching material and the ad-hoc arrangement by CBSE asking students to learn the basics of another Indian language from class six textbooks have increased the problems faced by students and teachers.“Making a compulsory subject mandatory without textbooks, trained teachers or an evaluation framework does not amount to quality education; it is a constitutional violation,” the petition said. The petition has requested the Supreme Court to stop CBSE from making such agreements on quality education.