Suriya has made a strong comeback at the box office with ‘Karuppu’ directed by RJ Balaji. Co-starring Trisha Krishnan, the mythological action drama has opened with excellent numbers and strong viewership across all markets.The film has made excellent earnings in its first weekend. There was a significant increase in the collection on both Saturday and Sunday.

‘Karuppu’ crosses Rs 120.75 crore worldwide

According to Sacknilk, ‘Karuppu’ has made a net collection of Rs 68 crore in India within three days. The film’s earnings in India have reached Rs 78.75 crore. Overseas markets have added Rs 42 crore to the total.With these figures, the worldwide collection of the film stands at Rs 120.75 crore after the opening weekend. Crossing the Rs 100 crore mark in just three days is a big milestone.

Big increase seen in day-wise collections of ‘Karuppu’

Karuppu opened with a net collection of Rs 15.50 crore in India on Friday. The film recorded an occupancy rate of 46.9 percent on the first day.Saturday brought a surge. The film earned Rs 24.15 crore, while the occupancy increased to 56.8 percent. The highest ever demonstration in a single day took place on Sunday. Karuppu collected Rs 28.35 crore, and occupancy rose to 64.3 per cent.

mythology of divine justice

‘Karuppu’ stars Suriya as Saravanan, a lawyer who turns out to be the human incarnation of the deity Karuppusamy. The story follows a hapless father and daughter who are robbed and entangled in the corrupt legal system.

Audience reactions range from praise to criticism

The film has received mixed but largely positive response from the audience.A netizen wrote, “”Karuppu Sammy Roers – Suriya peak performance and Sai Abhyankar magic! Suriya gives a career best performance as Karuppu Sammy with unmatched intensity and emotion. Sai Abhyankar creates pure magic with the music and background score, taking every scene to another level. A complete collective and emotional theatrical experience. 10/10!”Another viewer wrote, “A film of two halves. It feels like there are two films in one here. The first half was charming and emotional with a moral story, the ending of this half was quite heartbreaking… but this heartbreak couldn’t be followed up. The second part was complete nonsense, fodder for violence and loud noises for the masses. “Really disappointing after a solid start.”Disclaimer: The box office numbers and data in this article are compiled from public and industry sources. Unless explicitly noted, all figures are approximate, representing a fair representation of the film’s box office performance. These totals may change as official studio data is updated or additional international market reports are finalized. This data is provided by us for informational and entertainment purposes only.

The poignant choice Princess Diana once made for her sons made people look at her differently

While Princess Diana will always be known for her compassion and empathy in helping those in need around the world, according to people close to her, one of her most important characteristics was her maternal instincts. Once again, in an interview, Princess Diana’s butler revealed how much she loved her two sons. The interview dealt with a difficult but generous choice Princess Diana reportedly made when raising her sons while part of the British royal family.The comments were made amid discussion about the highly rated Netflix show, The Crown. The Crown has received criticism over its portrayal of the private lives of the British royal family. Those opposed to the series have argued that the show portrays Princess Diana as someone who fostered discord between Prince Charles and his two children. However, people who worked closely with Princess Diana have refuted this claim.Princess Diana always put her boys above everything elseAccording to reports, Princess Diana always thought about the welfare and future of her boys more than her own feelings. Former members of the royal family said Prince William and Prince Harry were Diana’s world.According to publicly available sources, Diana knew that her sons would have important responsibilities within the institution of the monarchy in the years to come. Speaking in his comments, which were widely covered by the media in Britain during 2022, Diana’s former butler, Paul Burrell, said he knew she wanted her children to spend some time with the entire royal family, including Queen Elizabeth II and other cousins, so they could learn about their traditions and duties in the future.According to butler Burrell, Diana loved her boys, but she knew they were family, too. Many people find these comments meaningful because this approach represents a balance between maternal feelings and responsibility. It is known that Diana was a mother who ensured that her children lived a simple and royal life. She took her sons with her for picnics, amusement parks, fast food and other activities among regular people. These details can be found in the book, Battle of Brothers, written by Robert Lacey, a royal historian.Princess Diana revolutionized parenting style in the royal householdPrincess Diana’s parenting style was considered progressive compared to other members of the royal family who came before her. Historians say that the royal children were cared for by their nannies and other members of the palace staff rather than their parents. However, Diana was able to change this perception.She hugged her sons in public, participated in their school activities, and encouraged open expression of emotions. It is believed to have contributed significantly to creating a more sympathetic view of the British monarchy. Many child development studies have emphasized the need for emotional connection between parents and their offspring. American Psychological Association States that emotional support and communication from parents play a vital role in building a child’s resilience and psychological strength.It has been suggested by various royal experts that Princess Diana had an underlying understanding of this concept long before it was discussed publicly in parenting forums. As reported by various royal correspondents, Diana was determined to hold hands with her sons and shower them with affection.

When Diana held back for William and Harry, it revealed her deeper instincts as a mother

The popular perception of Princess Diana is that of a loving mother.Even today, Diana remains one of the most beloved members of the royal family. Partly this is because many remember him for being kind and emotionally honest, as well as his relationship with William and Harry.Photos and videos of Diana with her boys have been widely shared online. These include photos of him joking around with her during holidays, consoling her at various events, or even supporting her during royal duties. Diana has always been considered one of the most beloved members of the royal family. This is largely due to his honesty and authenticity as a person.Although living the royal lifestyle meant being under constant scrutiny, Diana reportedly made sacrifices by allowing her sons to mature in a family environment. In the eyes of most royal fans, this story is not just one of sacrifice. It also includes elements of faith, devotion and maternal intuition to secure a better future for their offspring.

New Delhi: The External Affairs Ministry on Sunday expressed deep concern following the Iranian attacks targeting the Barakat nuclear facility in the United Arab Emirates, terming the attack as a “dangerous escalation” amid rising tensions in the Gulf.“India is deeply concerned by the attack targeting the Barakat nuclear facility in the UAE. Such actions are unacceptable and represent a dangerous escalation. We call for immediate restraint and a return to dialogue and diplomacy,” the Ministry of External Affairs said in a statement.Also read: Drone attack causes fire at nuclear plant in UAEThe reaction came after a fire broke out at the Barakah Nuclear Power Plant in Abu Dhabi following a drone strike. Emirati officials said the attack hit an electrical generator outside the plant’s inner perimeter, although there were no injuries or radiological leakage. Officials confirmed that security systems were intact and all units were operating normally.The attack has raised concerns over the fragile armistice between Iran, Israel and the United States, with diplomatic efforts also appearing strained. The UAE accused those behind the attack of carrying out an “unprovoked terrorist attack” and warned that it would not tolerate threats to its sovereignty.The UAE Foreign Ministry said, “These attacks are a dangerous escalation, an unacceptable act of aggression and a direct threat to the country’s security.”The International Atomic Energy Agency said the strike caused a fire near the facility after emergency diesel generators were supplying power to a reactor. The UN nuclear watchdog urged “maximum military restraint” around nuclear sites and said it was closely monitoring developments.The UAE Defense Ministry said three drones had entered its airspace from the western border with Saudi Arabia, with two being intercepted before reaching their targets. Authorities have not officially blamed any countries, although the UAE has previously accused Iran and allied groups of targeting energy infrastructure in the Gulf during the current conflict.The $20 billion Baraka plant, built with South Korean aid and scheduled to become operational in 2020, is the Arab world’s only nuclear power station and supplies about a quarter of the UAE’s electricity needs.The latest attack comes as the rhetoric between Tehran, Washington and Tel Aviv continues to escalate. US President Donald Trump warned Iran that “time is running out”, while Iranian officials insisted their forces were ready, despite diplomatic channels remaining open.

Dubai: A drone attack caused a fire at a nuclear power plant in the United Arab Emirates, Abu Dhabi officials said on Sunday, at a time when progress in efforts to end the US-Israel war with Iran and restart shipping in the Gulf appears to have stalled.Emirati officials said they were investigating the source of the attack and that the UAE had the full right to respond to such “terrorist attacks”. The UAE has previously accused Iran of attacking its energy targets, which it has said escalated the conflict in the region.The Abu Dhabi media office said the drone hit an electrical generator outside the inner perimeter of the Barakah nuclear power plant. It said radiological protection levels remained unaffected and no one was injured.The International Atomic Energy Agency said emergency diesel generators were providing power to “Unit 3” of the plant, and called for “maximum military restraint” near any nuclear power plant, adding that it was monitoring the situation closely. Barakah is the Arab world’s first and only nuclear power station.The UAE Defense Ministry said two other drones had been “successfully” dealt with, and that the drones were launched from the “western border”. It was not described in detail. agenciesUAE calls for unprovoked terrorist attack on N-reactorA statement from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said the UAE “condemns in the strongest terms the unprovoked terrorist attack” and “will not tolerate any threat to its security and sovereignty under any circumstances”. “These attacks are a dangerous escalation, an unacceptable act of aggression and a direct threat to the country’s security,” it said.During the war, which began with US and Israeli strikes against Iran on February 28, Iran has repeatedly targeted the United Arab Emirates and other Gulf countries that host US military bases, attacking sites that include civilian and energy infrastructure.The UAE hosts air defenses and personnel from Israel, which sparked a war with the US on February 28 by attacking Iran. Meanwhile, Iranian state television aired segments with news anchors holding rifles in an effort to prepare the public for war.The UAE Defense Ministry said three drones came across its western border with Saudi Arabia, with the other two being intercepted. It was being investigated who had launched them.The $20 billion Barakah Nuclear Power Plant was built by the UAE with help from South Korea and went online in 2020. It is the only nuclear power plant in the Arab world and can provide a quarter of the energy needs in the UAE. The UAE nuclear regulator said on Friday that the fire did not affect the safety of the plant and that “all units are operating normally.” The IAEA, the UN nuclear watchdog, said the attack caused a fire in an electrical generator and that a reactor was being powered by an emergency diesel generator.

Phil and Penny Knight’s $2 billion donation to OHSU’s Knight Cancer Institute is an example of legacy-changing philanthropy that moves beyond spontaneous “lightning strikes.”

Philanthropy, especially what we see on a large scale, is often seen as a lightning bolt in which a wealthy philanthropist suddenly throws an incredible amount of money at a problem somewhere far away. Of course, this is taken care of, the zodiac has an effect on us, and life goes back to normal. However, legacy-changing philanthropy doesn’t always work this way. What happens when a philanthropist focuses on a single area for ten years?In August 2025, OHSU surprised the world by setting a new benchmark in American philanthropy. Phil and Penny Knight donated $2 billion To the Knight Cancer Institute. It was the largest donation ever given to an American university or academic medical center. The statistics make the story impressive, but the crux of the story is the strategy behind it.This certainly wasn’t a spontaneous act of generosity from the Nike co-founder. Ultimately, this becomes another step in a long process thought out over the past several years. The Knights’ dedication to the organization chosen for this task made them more than mere “check-writers.” Instead, they become partners in the noble cause of revolutionizing the way we diagnose and health care provision. This is because this kind of long-term dedication inspires trust, which government funding can never provide.The power behind a decade of challengesTo understand the meaning behind such a large donation, one needs to delve deeper into what is known as the “challenge culture” established by the Knights of OHSU in 2013. His challenge was to donate $500 million, but only after he managed to raise the same amount of money in 24 months. Thus, a massive mobilization campaign began, in which a thousand people collected a total of $1 billion.It becomes clear from article title The lasting legacy of the Knight Cancer Challenge: Celebrating a decade of cancer research, care, prevention, This particular challenge became a milestone in terms of organizational capabilities. The institute has proven itself capable of implementing initiatives on a large scale without compromising on any of the promises made regarding early detection of cancer. In other words, the donation was received by an organization that had been successful for ten years and had all the necessary infrastructure in place. Rather than sowing seeds on virgin soil, donations were directed toward a mature institution ready to translate investments into patient outcomes.

This significant gift, the largest for a U.S. academic medical center, is the culmination of a decade-long strategic commitment that demonstrates how sustained dedication and proven organizational capability can revolutionize health care delivery and patient outcomes. Image Credit: Instagram/@OHSU Knight Cancer Institute

A machine, no monumentThe historical background presented above is important to understand the essence of philanthropy. You do not donate anything, rather you earn. The Knights did not invest in marketing, but in decades of work, data and achievements. As a result, the institution can ensure high-quality services and efficient management, allowing it to expand the existing system rather than investing in a yet-to-be-proven idea.Rather than focusing on the concept of moonshots, this partnership puts its emphasis on the patient’s lived experience. Rather than being used to support a long-term endowment fund, as is often the case with traditional medical gifts, the money will seek to immediately make a difference through architecture. This gives the hospital the ability to think boldly about becoming more than just a place that treats disease.Ultimately, the Knight Foundation’s legacy at OHSU is a testament to the importance of having roots in one’s place. Having firmly established itself in its native state, Oregon, it has proven the importance of commitment more than sporadic philanthropy any day. A commitment that endures long enough to make a dream come true builds more than a better hospital; It creates a legacy of life itself.

Ancient stone walls, built for strength and protection, vary dramatically in scale. While most function as cities or military fortifications, the Great Wall of China dwarfs all others, spanning 21,000 km.

When we consider the monuments of the past that have become landmarks within our scenery, few images come to mind more vividly than those of massive stone walls looming across the horizon. Such constructions were designed to make an absolute statement in terms of strength, protection and eternity. When we imagine such ancient odds in competition with each other, we forget that we are dealing with two different leagues.When we talk about cities and even entire military fortifications in Europe, Asia and parts of the Middle East, all surrounded by massive stone walls, there is one particular engineering project from East Asia that stands out because of its scale – literally feeling like an achievement of planetary proportions. There is nothing else like it in the world because of its length.The scale divide: continental walls vs. city wallsThe numbers can help us appreciate the magnitude of these achievements only in terms of scale. Almost all long walls that survived throughout time served as city or military fortress circuits. These were designed to protect either a local area of ​​people or an important hill position.According to an official survey documented by UNESCO World Heritage ConferenceThe true giants of history are classified not only by their height, but also by the total length of their surviving masonry. When we apply this standard, the gap between the top two places is so large that it is almost impossible to imagine. Here’s how the five most important living wall systems on the planet compare.1. the great wall of chinaThe Great Wall of China extends across the entire northern region of China and can be considered the most prominent ancient structure for defense. Most people think of just one section of the Great Wall – constructed during the Ming Dynasty – but in fact, there are moats, hills and walls built in different eras. The exact length of the wall, officially measured in China, is equal to 21,196 km.2. Kumbhalgarh Fort WallLocated in the Mewar Fort in Rajasthan, India, this wall is often affectionately called the Great Wall of India. It represents the pinnacle of Rajput military architecture. While it is clearly the runner-up on the world scale, its length is approximately 36 kilometers. This is a huge feat for a fortress, yet it is less than one percent of the length of the top slot.3. diyarbakir wallsThis basalt circuit in Türkiye is one of the most important surviving fortified lines in the Near East. Extending approximately 5.8 kilometres, the walls stood during the Roman, Byzantine and Ottoman eras, serving as a dark, impressive reminder of the city’s strategic value for thousands of years.4. the stone wallsOften referred to as the European Great Wall, this 5.5 kilometer long limestone barrier in Croatia was built to protect the salt pans of the Republic of Ragusa. It is an amazing example of how a relatively small community can muster enough resources to wall off an entire peninsula to protect its “white gold”.

Modern measurement techniques, including satellite imagery, have revealed its true, immense length, highlighting its unique position among global defensive structures. Image Credit: Wikimedia Commons

5. the walls of avilaThe list includes the most complete medieval circuit of Spain. These walls, approximately 2.5 kilometers long, have 88 semi-circular towers and are so well preserved that they look like a movie set. They represent the standard for a fully fortified medieval European city.Why do modern measurement maps keep changing?If you think the Great Wall has “grown” in length since you were in school, you’re not entirely wrong. The way we measure these ancient giants has evolved significantly with technology. A comprehensive study conducted by the UNESCO World Heritage Convention regarding the Great Wall of China shows that for centuries, we counted only the standing stone sections.Today, researchers use aerial photography and satellite imagery to identify buried sections and natural barriers that were officially part of the defense line. This is why the officially recognized numbers have increased from thousands to hundreds of thousands.Furthermore, an article in National Geographic This explains why wall rankings can be defined differently. While some scholars choose to count only the continuous length of the walls, others consider the total length of the branches. By the same logic, a fort like Kumbhalgarh can be considered as the second longest continuous wall in the world, while it is much shorter than the Great Wall complex of China.In short, these walls represent much more than a pile of rocks. They stand as a testament to the resilience of the human spirit. Whether they were built to protect a Spanish city or to mark the perimeter of an entire empire, they symbolize the idea that when people chose to build permanent structures, they changed not only the scenery but also the maps.

Elina Svitolina scripted one of the most emotional wins of her career after winning the 2026 Italian Open title in Rome, and no one looked prouder than her husband Gael Monfils. Moments after Svitolina’s stunning win, Monfils shared an emotional tribute on social media that instantly resonated with tennis fans around the world.

On Saturday, Svitolina defeated Coco Gauff in a thrilling three-set final, winning 6-4, 6-7(3), 6-2 and reclaiming the clay-court title after an eight-year wait. Monfils also praised Svitolina’s resilience and strength during her comeback journey after motherhood, saying that she continues to inspire her every day.

“Eight years. Eight years to get back on top of the Masters 1000. What a season, what a week, what a player. But above all, what a woman. An incredible mother to Skye, an extraordinary athlete, a soul like no other,” Monfils wrote.

“I’m so proud of you, my love. Of your strength, of your peace, of everything you quietly carry day after day. You inspire me every day. Enjoy it, soak it all in. You deserve every second of it. I love you,” Monfils said.

Svitolina’s victory in Rome marked a notable milestone in her career. After becoming a mother in 2022 and battling injuries in recent seasons, the Ukrainian has fully re-established herself among the top players on the WTA Tour. She also captured her first WTA 1000 title after giving birth to my daughter Ending an eight-year wait between their Rome crowns.

How did Svitolina beat Gauff?

Against Gauff, Svitolina started aggressively, using her movement and defensive skills to frustrate Gauff in long rallies before winning the opening set 6–4.

Gauff made a strong comeback in the second set and forced a tiebreak, where the American player raised her level and took the match to the deciding set. However, Svitolina completely dominated the third set with her consistency from the baseline and her ability to absorb pressure before counterattacking at the right time.

The title was historically significant for Svitolina. She became the Italian Open champion three times, having previously won the tournament in 2017 and 2018.

Her performance in Rome was exceptional, as she defeated top names including Elena Rybakina, Iga Swiatek and Gauff on her way to the title. In doing so, Svitolina became the oldest player to defeat three top-five opponents in a single WTA 1000 event since 1990, surpassing Serena Williams’ previous record.

– ends