Months after conservative commentator’s death charlie kirkA resurfaced video of him and Candace Owens has caused heated debate online. The clip, which recently went viral on social media, shows Kirk publicly defending Owens and praising his role in the conservative movement. Although the video was filmed years ago, its revival has received renewed attention due to the growing controversy surrounding Owens’ comments and actions following Kirk’s death.The viral clip comes at a time when emotions are still running high among Kirk’s supporters, political allies and critics. Many users saw the video as a reminder of the once strong professional relationship between the two. Others said the circumstances of its reappearance have deepened divisions within conservative circles.

Charlie Kirk’s support of Candace Owens is in the news again

In the resurfaced clip, Charlie Kirk expressed his strong support for Owens, and made clear that he sees him as an important ally. “We’re on Team Candace and I’m also, you know, I’m on Team Freedom,” she said in the interview.Owens later posted the clip on social media and reflected on Kirk’s support during a challenging time in his career. In her post, she wrote, “Charlie has always supported me, but especially after the Daily Wire controversy and the subsequent media shaming.The exchange quickly went viral online with thousands of reactions. Supporters praised the friendship and loyalty shown in the video, while others questioned the timing of its release. The conversation soon moved beyond the clip into a larger discussion about Kirk’s legacy and the tensions that arose after his death.

Candace Owens faces criticism over Charlie Kirk’s posthumous claims

The resurfaced footage also revived criticism of Owens over statements he made after Kirk’s death. Critics argue that his recent allegations involving Kirk’s family and leadership at Turning Point USA contradict with the supportive relationship shown in the older videos.Social media users were particularly vocal in the comments section. One commenter wrote, “And you repaid it by tarnishing his legacy, his family, and trying to destroy the organization he dedicated his life to. With such friends..” Another said, “It would have been nice if you returned the favor.”A third user posted, “Hey Candace, Charlie and Erica are one flesh. Attacking Erica is attacking Charlie. Bringing up old videos to justify your attack on his wife is disgusting. Charlie will choose his wife over you every day. Stop pretending he’ll side with you on this.”As the debate continues on online platforms, the resurfaced video has become more than a mere nostalgia for the previous alliance. Instead, it has developed into a flashpoint in the ongoing battle over loyalty, legacy and how Charlie Kirk should be remembered.

A controversial social media streamer has been removed from a flight after airline staff said her condition following facial surgery has raised concerns about whether she is fit to travel. Ronan Androgenic, a 25-year-old influencer based in Brisbane, Australia, shared a video on TikTok showing the moment he was asked to leave after boarding a Jetstar flight. According to Androgenic, he had undergone cosmetic surgery in Thailand five days ago and was trying to return home.The video immediately gained attention online. In the footage, Ronan Androgenic can be seen sitting on the plane with heavy bandages on his jaw and chin. He claimed that airline staff questioned his condition and ultimately decided he could not remain on the flight. Ronan Androgen told the audience that staff were worried because they did not have their medicines in their carry-on luggage. However, airline staff also pointed to his physical condition, saying that he looked unusually tired and unwell. Staff members said his reactions were slow and visible swelling around his face and eyes raised concerns about his health.

Ronan Androgynous disputes Jetstar’s decision after facial surgery in Thailand

During the exchange shown in the video, airline employees repeatedly told Ronan Androgenic that they were concerned about his ability to complete the flight safely. An employee said he seemed sleepy while answering questions. Another pointed to the swelling on his face and said he was not feeling well enough to travel.Ronan Androgenic strongly disagreed. He said he was only tired because he was preparing to sleep during the flight. He also said that a doctor had cleared him to fly after the procedure.According to the video, Ronan Androgenic argued that it is normal to rest before a long flight. He told staff he had to go home and felt he was being treated unfairly despite having medical clearance.As the discussion progressed, it became more heated. Airline staff told them that even if they had previously shown a document, crew members were still responsible for deciding whether a passenger was fit to fly at the time of boarding. Staff also said his behavior during the disagreement was becoming disruptive.Jetstar later responded to the incident in a statement to News.com.au. The airline said crew members are trained to assess passengers before departure and can deny travel if they feel someone is not healthy enough to fly safely. Jetstar also said that abusive language and aggressive behavior towards staff is not accepted.Ronan Androgenic is known for promoting “luxmaxing” online, which focuses on improving physical appearance through intensive self-improvement, cosmetic procedures and body modification. This trend has gained popularity on social media in recent years. Another creator associated with this trend, Clavicular, has also faced controversy in the past for online content that has attracted criticism.

QTCinderella has returned to the Internet after a deep personal loss, but instead of finding support, the popular Twitch star says she encountered something far more disturbing. The producer, who recently stepped away from social media while mourning the death of her longtime dog Swift, is now taking action against accounts she believes are profiting from harassment and misinformation.The streamer has announced a major change in the way it handles unauthorized clips of its content. After years of largely ignoring repost and commentary channels, she says some accounts have crossed a line by turning harmless moments of their broadcasts into fuel for targeted online attacks.

cutiecinderella legal action target clip accounts are expanding misleading narrative

In a lengthy statement shared on X, QTCinderella revealed that she plans to pursue DMCA takedowns against accounts that use her content in ways she deems malicious or intentionally misleading. The move marks a significant change for a creator who has rarely relied on legal tools to protect his content.Explaining his frustration, QT wrote:“It’s not something I’ve ever done,” he wrote. “But this is something I’m setting my limits on. Call me abusive or pathetic, whatever you want, in order to take legal action. My bullshit is over.”His comments immediately received support from fans and fellow creators, many of whom argued that content manipulation has become a growing problem on streaming platforms and social media. Supporters praised his decision to set clear boundaries and defend himself against coordinated hate campaigns.

QTCinderella controversy highlights wider creators’ concerns over clip farming

The problem is not just of one creator. Over the past year, social media platforms have been flooded with accounts reposting clips from streamers with sensationalist captions, misleading references or false claims to increase engagement.Many high-profile creators have expressed concern over this trend. Earlier this year, streamer Jasontheween spoke about possible legal action against an account linking him and Pokimane to a criminal case without evidence. The situation reportedly calmed down, the posts were removed, but it showed how quickly misinformation can spread online.The matter has also come to X. Platform officials recently admitted that some accounts are making profits and gaining visibility from reposts. In response, X has begun redirecting impressions and credits to the original creators instead of accounts that recycle content without adding original value.The message to QTCinderella is simple: criticism is part of the job, but using the clip as a tool for harassment is a line she’s no longer willing to cross.

New Delhi: To prevent paper leaks in NEET-UG, the Center is actively exploring the use of IAF aircraft to transport question papers for the June 21 re-examination, as part of a comprehensive “whole of government” security strategy involving the Home Ministry, central agencies and state police networks, reports Manas Gohain.The proposal was discussed at a high-level meeting on Thursday led by Defense Minister Rajnath Singh and attended by Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan, Communications Minister Jyotiraditya Scindia, senior PMO officials, NTA DG Abhishek Singh and top bureaucrats from several ministries. According to Education Ministry sources, the government is considering deploying the Indian Air Force only for transport logistics “due to time constraints and does not want to take any risks this time”.Sources stressed that no final decision has been taken yet and the proposal will be placed before PM Narendra Modi before any formal approval.However, the move acknowledges the ever-evolving tactics used by those determined to leak entrance exam papers for prestigious seats in medical colleges and the importance of the government to ensure the integrity of the upcoming NEET. “The approach this time is that each vulnerable point in the examination chain should be secured with maximum redundancies and supervision. The government is leaving no stone unturned,” a source said.Sources said that if the Indian Air Force’s plan is implemented, its aircraft will deliver exam papers for the upcoming NEET to select locations in the state, such as Lucknow, Agra and Gorakhpur and Varanasi in UP; Patna and Darbhanga in Bihar; Kolkata and Bagdogra in Bengal. From then on, state agencies will handle the work of delivering the papers to the districts and keeping them in safe custody and transporting them to the examination centres. At present, the delivery of papers is done by the Department of Posts.Officials said the meeting took a detailed review of the entire examination cycle – from the panel of paper setters and printing protocols to the transport routes, storage facilities, distribution network and last-mile security arrangements at the examination centres.Apart from exploring the use of the Indian Air Force, deeper coordination with the Home Ministry and state home departments for safe movement and monitoring of question papers was also discussed. Sources said the district administration and police units are likely to be more closely integrated into the transportation and custody chain.The Prime Minister is understood to be personally monitoring preparations for the June 21 re-examination and is being regularly briefed on operational and security measures related to the examination process, officials said. NEET-UG 2026 was canceled on May 12 following allegations of question paper leak. CBI has arrested 13 people from different cities.

Immediately after a brutal cricket match, coaches usually look for answers in spreadsheets, data metrics or video footage. They look for the precise moment when the strategic plan falls apart at the edges. But when a 15-year-old kid from Bihar systematically demolished Lucknow Super Giants at the start of the Indian Premier League season, Justin Langer did something he has only done twice in his entire life.

He walked across the field, put thirty-five years of elite cricket pride aside, and asked an opposing athlete, in this case a 15-year-old teenager, for a selfie.

Langer first felt that specific, unattainable desire to be starstruck at Optus Stadium, standing in front of his childhood Australian rules football hero, Stephen Michael. The second time was in the presence of Vaibhav Suryavanshi, a boy born in 2011, who had spent the evening hitting Langer’s bowlers into parts of the stadium he was not aware of.

The least understood word in sports: talent

Later writing in his column for The Nightly, Langer admitted that he was completely charmed. In a single IPL season, Suryavanshi has hit 65 sixes so far – An awesome metric of destructive consistency that is second to none in IPL history. The closest to glory comes Chris Gayle’s legendary 2012 campaign, where he hit 59 shots across the boundary.

And as the tournament reached its conclusion, the teenage talent did it again. In Wednesday’s high-stakes eliminator against Sunrisers Hyderabad, Suryavanshi turned a high-pressure playoff into his personal playground by scoring 97 runs off just 29 balls. When a modern great like Pat Cummins tried to regain control by rocketing a 140 kmph delivery over the top of the off-stump, Vaibhav did not defend. he just turned it around The entire arc of his bat and was deposited over the Australian captain’s head.

It’s the kind of raw, uneducated dominance that forces you to rethink everything you understand about a specific sport. It bypasses the traditional paths of development. It doesn’t feel like it’s a skill acquired over thousands of hours; It feels like a birthright.

And that got Langer thinking about the most overused and least understood word in sports terminology: talent.

While Vaibhav was rewriting the rules of what was possible for a 15-year-old in India, an entirely different sporting monument was being built on the other side of the planet. In Melbourne, a 38-year-old veteran player named Scott Pendlebury was preparing to run out for his 433rd game in the AFL, breaking the all-time VFL/AFL appearance record.

Pendlebury was never considered a football immortal. At the age of 16, he was a basketball guard with an Australian Institute of Sport scholarship – a position he eventually left for a young kid named Patty Mills. When Pendlebury chose football, no one saw a lanky kid selected at pick five and predicted a generational legacy. He was not a product of pure, explosive destiny like Donald Bradman or Sachin Tendulkar.

Instead, Pendlebury built his talent in obscurity. He took his basketball DNA – spatial awareness, soft hands, an uncanny ability to slow down time while chaos unfolded around him – and infused it into 21 seasons of brutal, weekly contact play. If Vaibhav Suryavanshi is talent in its most raw, God-given expression, then Scott Pendlebury is talent as a verb. It is a craft that has been refined, maintained and steadfastly preserved over decades of unseen dawns.

How do we see greatness?

Langer’s observation goes to the heart of how we view greatness. As sports fans, we are always fascinated by this advent. We love the flash of lightning, the teenage genius who appears out of nowhere, bowling at 150 kilometers per hour, before the world is even ready to remember his name.

But as former Australian coach John Buchanan used to remind Langer, longevity is the ultimate mark of a true champion. This left Tendulkar and Ponting aside from the flashes in the pan. That’s what makes LeBron James or the Williams sisters great. Looking and surviving at your absolute peak for twenty requires an entirely different kind of talent than hitting six at fifteen.

The beautiful truth of the game is hidden somewhere between the boy from Bihar and the Superman of Collingwood.

there is one layer of greatness That which cannot be trained and brought into existence – Bradman’s eye, Tendulkar’s timing, Suryavanshi’s innate power. But that gift means nothing if it is not ultimately connected to the painstaking, patient architecture of a craft. The best people in business accept gifts, but they refuse to trust them.

At the moment, the global game is seeing both ends of that intriguing spectrum. In Melbourne, a 38-year-old man has overcome an entire generation through his work ethic and willpower. And in India, a 15-year-old kid is playing cricket like he was sent from another planet.

Both are undeniably talented. But as Justin Langer watched a teenager tear the cricket world apart on Wednesday night, it left us with a final question to ponder:

Which version of talent inspires you more – the gift, or the craft?

ipl 2026 | ipl schedule | ipl points table | ipl player stats | purple cap | orange cap | ipl video | cricket news | live score

– ends

Naomi Osaka is not changing her approach French OpenDespite criticism that more attention was being paid to his on-court presence than to his tennis. The Japanese star once again made a spectacular entry ahead of her second round match against Donna Vekic at Roland Garros. This time, she walked into court wearing an ivory-colored flowing train at the back of her dress. She also wore a matching warm-up jacket before removing extra layers before the game.The appearance came just days after Osaka’s first-round match, when her opponent, Germany’s Laura Siegemund, questioned how much time Osaka was allowed to spend taking off her outfit before the start of the match. Siegmund made it clear that his issue was not with the design but with how the tournament rules were implemented.Osaka is known for turning Grand Slam arrivals into fashion moments. At this year’s French Open, she first appeared in a black corset and skirt made from recycled Nike garments and later revealed a glittering gold dress, which she said reminded her of the Eiffel Tower at night. Despite the controversy surrounding her outfits, Osaka continues to attract attention and says she enjoys keeping fans guessing what she will wear next.

Naomi Osaka responds to criticism as Laura Siegmund questions French Open rules over organization change

After the first round loss, Laura Siegemond spoke to TNT Sports and explained why she was disappointed.“I’m here to play tennis, not do a fashion show,” Sigmund said. “And if other people want to do a fashion show, they should go ahead and do that. That’s perfectly fine with me.”He continued to focus on unequal treatment under tournament rules.“I find something else problematic. In our sport, in every tournament they count every second, right up until you open your water bottle. But he may get one and a half minutes to change it. I have a problem with that, because these rules just exist and that’s the way they are.”“And I also think that with a performance like this, every second has to count. That’s the only thing in terms of the rules that I don’t think is right and where, once again, the big names are treated differently.”Meanwhile, Osaka appeared relaxed about the conversation surrounding her outfit. Speaking about her gold dress she said that it reminded her of the famous Paris landmark.“When I saw the dress for the first time in real life, I felt like I looked like the Eiffel Tower at night when it was glowing,” Osaka said.“And then I actually got a little worried, because when the sun hits the dress, it reflects a lot. I was a little scared that the umpire was going to throw me off the court.”Osaka also explained why fashion remains an important part of her tournament performance.“Sometimes people say athletes or entertainers or something in show business. I feel like, for me, Grand Slam walk-ons are the only time I possibly think I’m an entertainer.”When asked if she planned a different outfit for every match, Osaka replied with a smile: “You know, I like to keep people excited. I think it’s really fun.”The former world No. 1 has built a reputation for bold fashion statements at major events, and based on her latest appearance in Paris, she’s not interested in slowing down any time soon.

New Delhi: Despite a steep decline over the past decade, Indians are still spending more out of pocket on health care than people in many neighboring and developing countries, according to the National Health Accounts (NHA) Estimates 2022-23 released by the Health Ministry.The report’s international comparison of out-of-pocket expenditure (OOPE) showed that India’s per capita expenditure out of personal pocket in 2022 was $121 international dollars (PPP), ranking the country 64th globally. Data show that despite the expansion of public health care schemes and insurance coverage, families in India continue to bear a large portion of the treatment costs themselves. In neighboring countries, the OOPE burden was 85 international dollars in Pakistan, 180 in Nepal, 130 in Bangladesh and 246 international dollars in Sri Lanka.

However, the report points to a major long-term improvement within India. Out-of-pocket expenditure as a share of total health expenditure declined sharply from 64.2% in 2013-14 to 43.4% in 2022-23. Government officials attributed the decline to rising public health expenditure, expansion of Ayushman Bharat PM-JAY, free medicine schemes, wider access to primary health services through Jan Aushadhi shops and Ayushman Arogya Mandirs.Government health expenditure has almost tripled in the last decade, from Rs 1.3 lakh crore in 2013-14 to Rs 3.8 lakh crore in 2022-23, the report showed. Health economists say that despite recent reforms, India’s health care financing system remains largely dependent on domestic spending.According to the report, drugs and pharmaceutical purchases remain the largest driver of personal health care spending in India. International comparisons also showed huge contradictions at the global level. Switzerland reported the highest per capita out-of-pocket spending in the world at 2,302 international dollars, followed by Malta at 1,729 and Singapore at 1,647.Among major developed economies, the US reported an OOPE of 1,380 international dollars, while the UK stood at 857 and Canada at 1,038.At the low end of the global ranking, Kiribati recorded the world’s lowest OOPE at just 2 international dollars, followed by Tuvalu and Solomon Islands at 4 international dollars each.Public health experts say low out-of-pocket spending is considered a leading indicator of strong public health care systems because it reduces the risk of families falling into poverty due to medical expenses.

Helen Mirren is in the news over alleged drama on the ‘Mobland’ set involving co-star Tom Hardy. However, on Thursday night, a video of the veteran actress went viral on social media when a pro-Palestine protestor called her an ‘evil Zionist b****’.

Helen Mirren’s video goes viral

The actress was filmed crossing the street at night with her husband, filmmaker Taylor Hackford. A man filming the couple confronted them over their Israel-Palestine views. The clip, which has been widely broadcast on X, shows the unidentified man approaching the Oscar-winner and shouting from behind the camera, “There’s Helen Mirren, the avowed Zionist. You said Israel should last forever because of the Holocaust. And she was very happy that the Palestinians went home.”The video shows Mirren’s husband, Hackford, telling the man to “f*** off”.

A man called Helen Mirren an ‘evil Zionist scumbag’

“You posted. You are an evil Zionist,” he said before leaving.

About Video Video

Although the exact date of the recording is unclear, The Times reported that the footage is believed to be old and was originally shared in November.According to the latest reports, the incident is now being investigated as an alleged hate crime.

What did Helen Mirren say on Israel?

As far as the allegations against Mirren are concerned, the actress made some comments during the promotion of her film ‘Golda’, in which she plays former Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meir. According to The Telegraph, Mirren previously said, “I believe in Israel, in the existence of Israel, and I believe that Israel has to go forward into the future, into eternity. I believe in Israel because of the Holocaust.“